| Literature DB >> 26992396 |
Ana Luiza Vilela Borges1, Christiane Borges do Nascimento Chofakian2, Ana Paula Sayuri Sato3, Elizabeth Fujimori2, Luciane Simões Duarte2, Murilo Novaes Gomes4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We assessed whether the reported decrease in fertility rates among 15 to 19 years old Brazilian adolescents has met with a parallel decrease in very young adolescent (10 to 14 years old) fertility rates. So we explored temporal trends for fertility rates among very young adolescents between 2000 and 2012 for Brazil as a whole, its regions and states; and also analyzed the spatial distribution of fertility rates among Brazilian municipalities in the years 2000 and 2012.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Adolescent pregnancy; Age-specific fertility rate; Birth rate; Sexual and reproductive health; Very young adolescent
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26992396 PMCID: PMC4797224 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0843-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1Brazilian geographical features: a Brazil and South America; b Brazilian states and federal district; c Brazilian regions
Fig. 2Fertility rates among adolescents between 10 and 14 years of age in Brazil and its geographic regions, 2000-2012
Fertility rates (years 2000 and 2012) and fertility rate trends (2000 to 2012) among adolescents between 10 and 14 years of age in Brazilian regions and states
| Fertility rate per 1,000 | Fertility rate trend 2000 to 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2012 | APCa | APC CI 95 % | r2 | Trend | ||
| BRAZIL | 3.38 | 3.29 | 0.15 | −1.48 | 1.80 | 0.88 | - |
| Distrito Federalb | 2.86 | 2.05 | −2.82 | −4.38 | −1.24 | 0.83 | Decrease |
| NORTH | 5.46 | 5.85 | 1.05 | −0.15 | 2.27 | 0.88 | - |
| Acre | 7.42 | 7.11 | 0.84 | −0.19 | 1.88 | 0.58 | - |
| Amapá | 6.70 | 5.63 | −0.48 | −2.16 | 1.18 | 0.04 | - |
| Amazonasb | 5.57 | 7.05 | 2.49 | 1.33 | 3.67 | 0.73 | Increase |
| Pará | 4.89 | 5.56 | 1.34 | −0.36 | 3.08 | 0.89 | - |
| Rondônia | 4.72 | 3.50 | −1.54 | −3.14 | 0.10 | 0.40 | - |
| Roraima | 10.86 | 8.77 | −1.93 | −3.92 | 0.11 | 0.06 | - |
| Tocantins | 6.20 | 5.00 | 1.26 | −3.32 | 0.87 | 0.88 | - |
| NORTHEAST | 3.72 | 4.07 | 1.21 | −0.42 | 2.86 | 0.83 | - |
| Alagoas | 4.80 | 5.63 | 1.86 | −0.85 | 4.64 | 0.72 | - |
| Bahiab | 3.39 | 3.84 | 1.65 | 0.07 | 3.25 | 0.74 | Increase |
| Ceará | 3.54 | 3.56 | 0.57 | −1.70 | 2.90 | 0.77 | - |
| Maranhão | 3.94 | 4.98 | 2.42 | −0.04 | 4.94 | 0.55 | - |
| Paraíba | 3.22 | 3.51 | 1.01 | −0.32 | 2.35 | 0.42 | - |
| Pernambuco | 3.83 | 4.07 | 0.68 | −1.21 | 2.60 | 0.79 | - |
| Piauí | 3.83 | 3.55 | 0.18 | −1.56 | 1.94 | 0.52 | - |
| Rio Grande do Norte | 4.30 | 3.83 | −0.60 | −3.91 | 2.83 | 0.76 | - |
| Sergipe | 3.87 | 3.86 | 1.03 | −2.10 | 4.25 | 0.65 | - |
| MIDWESTb | 4.26 | 3.41 | −1.59 | −2.92 | −0.24 | 0.95 | Decrease |
| Goiás | 3.69 | 3.07 | −1.25 | −3.09 | 0.63 | 0.87 | - |
| Mato Grossob | 5.27 | 3.99 | −1.70 | −2.75 | −0.63 | 0.88 | Decrease |
| Mato Grosso do Sul | 5.54 | 4.86 | −0.50 | −1.91 | 0.92 | 0.78 | - |
| SOUTHEAST | 2.54 | 2.24 | −0.64 | −2.83 | 1.60 | 0.74 | - |
| Espírito Santo | 2.96 | 2.73 | −0.35 | −3.47 | 2.86 | 0.64 | - |
| Minas Gerais | 1.99 | 1.94 | 0.08 | −1.66 | 1.85 | 0.64 | - |
| Rio de Janeirob | 3.60 | 2.81 | −1.90 | −3.37 | −0.42 | 0.89 | Decrease |
| São Paulo | 2.41 | 2.13 | −0.38 | −3.02 | 2.34 | 0.61 | - |
| SOUTHb | 3.15 | 2.45 | −1.59 | −3.04 | −0.12 | 0.88 | Decrease |
| Paraná | 3.32 | 2.93 | −0.77 | −2.22 | 0.70 | 0.85 | - |
| Rio Grande do Sulb | 3.39 | 2.14 | −2.76 | −3.84 | −1.68 | 0.72 | Decrease |
| Santa Catarina | 2.41 | 2.13 | −0.71 | −2.87 | 1.51 | 0.80 | - |
aAPC = annual percent change
bSignificant at level 0.05
Fig. 3LISA (panels a and b) and Bayesian thematic maps (panels c and d) showing the distribution of fertility rates among adolescents between 10 to 14 years old across Brazilian municipalities, in the years 2000 and 2012