| Literature DB >> 26992390 |
Wouter W Jansen Klomp1,2, Arno P Nierich3, Linda M Peelen4, George J Brandon Bravo Bruinsma5, Jan-Henk E Dambrink6, Karel G M Moons4, Arnoud W J Van't Hof6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, advanced age is often a reason for a transcatheter rather than surgical aortic valve replacement. In this pre-transcatheter cohort we had the unique opportunity to study outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in patients who might currently be triaged to a percutaneous approach.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic Valve Replacement; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cardiac Surgery; Elderly; Octogenarian; Quality of Life
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26992390 PMCID: PMC4799630 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-016-0432-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1749-8090 Impact factor: 1.637
Fig. 1Study flowchart and follow-up. Legend: Patients were included between November 1st 2007 and August 1st 2011*One hundred patients were excluded in total; five patients met two exclusion criteria, i.e. active endocarditis and non-elective surgery. AVR = aortic valve replacement, CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting, FU = follow-up
Baseline characteristics and operative characteristics
| Age < 80 | Age ≥ 80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Male sex | 363 (60.8) | 85 (52.1) | 0.057 | |
| Age, years | 71 (66–75) | 82 (81–83) | <0.001 | |
| History of: | ||||
| DM | 145 (24.4) | 37 (22.7) | 0.727 | |
| Hypertension | 325 (54.4) | 98 (60.1) | 0.228 | |
| COPD | 116 (19.4) | 30 (18.4) | 0.855 | |
| Peripheral VD | 70 (11.7) | 17 (10.4) | 0.748 | |
| Stroke | 66 (11.1) | 20 (12.3) | 0.768 | |
| MI | 74 (12.4) | 21 (12.9) | 0.979 | |
| PCI | 65 (10.9) | 18 (11.0) | 1.000 | |
| Cardiac surgery | 42 (7.0) | 8 (4.9) | 0.428 | |
| Creatinine (mmol/L) | 88 (75–104) | 92 (77–110) | 0.001 | |
| EuroSCORE | 6 (5–7) | 8 (8–10) | <0.001 | |
| Log EuroSCORE | 4.9 (3.1–7.6) | 10.7 (8.4–15.7) | <0.001 | |
| LVEF | >50 % | 468 (78.7) | 113 (69.3) | 0.044 |
| 30–50 % | 103 (17.3) | 40 (24.5) | ||
| <30 % | 24 (4.0) | 10 (6.1) | ||
| NYHA | Class 1 | 145 (24.3) | 45 (27.6) | 0.149 |
| Class 2 | 342 (57.4) | 80 (49.1) | ||
| Class 3 | 109 (18.3) | 38 (23.3) | ||
| Peak gradient AV (mmHg) | 73 (60–90) | 71 (58–88) | 0.55 | |
| Operative characteristics | ||||
| Bioprosthesis | 541 (90.6) | 159 (97.6) | <0.001 | |
| CABG | 298 (49.9) | 75 (46.0) | 0.426 | |
| X-clamp time (min) | 91 (75–111) | 82 (68–107) | 0.004 | |
Baseline chararcteristics and operative characteristics in octogenarians and patients aged less than 80 years. Values are number (%), continuous variables are presented as median (25th–75th percentile)
DM diabetes mellitus, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, VD vascular disease, MI myocardial infarction, PCI percutanaeous coronary intervention, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA New York Heart Association, AV aortic valve, peak gradient = maximum gradient over the aortic valve, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting
Patient outcomes
| Age < 80 | Age ≥ 80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| In-hospital Outcomes | ||||
| Delirium | 37 (6.2) | 18 (11.0) | 0.034 | |
| Stroke | 21 (3.5) | 5 (3.1) | 0.97 | |
| MI | 17 (3.0) | 4 (2.6) | 1.00a | |
| AKIN | No injury | 537 (92.4) | 148 (90.8) | 0.22 |
| Stage 1 | 36 (6.2) | 12 (7.4) | ||
| Stage 2 | 5 (0.9) | 0 (0) | ||
| Stage 3 | 3 (0.5) | 3 (1.8) | ||
| Hospital stay (days) | 7 (5–9) | 7 (5–12) | 0.031 | |
| Mortality | ||||
| In-hospital | 13 (2.2) | 2 (1.2) | 0.75a | |
| Operative | 17 (2.9) | 3 (1.9) | 0.59a | |
| 1-Year | 33 (6.3) | 9 (6.5) | 1.00 | |
Comparison of operative chararcteristics and patient outcomes. Operative mortality is either 30-day or in-hospital mortality
MI myocardial infarction, AKIN acute kidney injury network
a Fisher’s Exact test
Fig. 2Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. Legend: Kaplan-Meier estimated survival in octogenarians (red line and 95 % confidence interval [CI]) compared to patients aged <80 years (green line and 95 % CI); as a reference the dotted black lines depict the predicted survival for Dutch inhabitants with a similar distribution of age and sex as the two study groups
Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing surgical AVR
| Baseline | 30 days | 1 year | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Score | Change from baselinea | P for change | Cohen’s effect sizeb | % reaching MCID | Score | Change from baselinea | P for change | Cohen’s effect size2 | % reaching MCID | |
| PCS | |||||||||||
| Age < 80 | 44.27 | 44.11 | −0.16 | 0.73 | −0.02 | 39.0 | 51.34 | 6.95 | <0.001 | 0.78 | 66.8 |
| Age > 80 | 44.86 | 45.01 | 0.09† | 0.93 | 0.01 | 40.1 | 49.92 | 4.84† | <0.001 | 0.54 | 60.7 |
| MCS | |||||||||||
| Age < 80 | 49.12 | 48.33 | −0.81 | 0.073 | −0.52 | 36.2 | 50.83 | 1.67 | 0.006 | 0.22 | 44.2 |
| Age > 80 | 51.17 | 48.21 | −2.96† | 0.002 | −0.64 | 32.5 | 52.55 | 1.31† | 0.126 | 0.14 | 39.6 |
aThe “change from baseline” in octogenarians was compared to patients aged <80 years using an independent samples t test and corrected for the baseline component score, where † indicates p > 0.05
bAn effect size of <0.20 can be considered as clinically irrelevant, 0.20–0.49 as small, 0.50–0.79 as moderate and > 0.80 as large. PCS = physical component score, MCS = mental component score, MCID = minimal clinically important difference
Association between age and the PCS and MCS scores at 30 days and 1 year follow-up
| PCS – 30 days | PCS – 1 year | |||||
| β | (95 % CI) |
| β | (95 % CI) |
| |
| Age | 0.20 | (0.14–0.27) | <0.001 | −0.00 | (−0.11–0.10) | 0.90 |
| Age (+ baseline PCS) | 0.16 | (0.10–0.22) | <0.001 | −0.07 | (−0.17–0.04) | 0.19 |
| Age (full model) | 0.30 | (0.08–0.15) | <0.001 | 0.08 | (−0.11–0.16) | 0.34 |
| MCS – 30 days | MCS – 1 year | |||||
| β | (95 % CI) |
| β | (95 % CI) |
| |
| Age | −0.05 | (−0.14–0.03) | 0.22 | 0.07 | (−0.02–0.15) | 0.11 |
| Age (+ baseline) | −0.08 | (−0.16–0.00) | 0.05 | 0.05 | (−0.03–0.14) | 0.20 |
| Age (full model) | −0.07 | (−0.22–0.83) | 0.37 | 0.08 | (−0.08–0.25) | 0.32 |
Table shows the univariable and multivariably adjusted asociation between age and the component scores; the full model also included: sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, extracardiac atherosclerosis, history of stroke, history of myocardial infarction, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, previous cardic surgery, NYHA class, CCS class, left ventricular function, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic peak gradient, logistic EuroSCORE and baseline physical component score for the PCS model, or baseline mental component score for the MCS model. PCS = physical component score, MCS = mental component score