Literature DB >> 26992381

A Practice Quality Improvement Project: Reducing Dose of Routine Chest CT Imaging in a Busy Clinical Practice.

Edwin A Takahashi1, Marc D Kohli2, Shawn D Teague3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to describe our experience with the implementation of a practice quality improvement (PQI) project in thoracic imaging as part of the American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification process. The goal of this PQI project was to reduce the effective radiation dose of routine chest CT imaging in a busy clinical practice by employing the iDose(4) (Philips Healthcare) iterative reconstruction technique. The dose reduction strategy was implemented in a stepwise process on a single 64-slice CT scanner with a volume of 1141 chest CT scans during the year. In the first annual quarter, a baseline effective dose was established using the standard filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm protocol and standard parameters such as kVp and mAs. The iDose(4) technique was then applied in the second and third annual quarters while keeping all other parameters unchanged. In the fourth quarter, a reduction in kVp was also implemented. Throughout the process, the images were continually evaluated to assure that the image quality was comparable to the standard protocol from multiple other scanners. Utilizing a stepwise approach, the effective radiation dose was reduced by 23.62 and 43.63 % in quarters two and four, respectively, compared to our initial standard protocol with no perceived difference in diagnostic quality. This practice quality improvement project demonstrated a significant reduction in the effective radiation dose of thoracic CT scans in a busy clinical practice.

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Dose reduction; Iterative reconstruction; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992381      PMCID: PMC5023523          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9877-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  28 in total

1.  MOC for dollars.

Authors:  Ezequiel Silva
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Is computed tomography safe?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.

Authors:  Mitsuru Matsuki; Takamichi Murakami; Hiroshi Juri; Shushi Yoshikawa; Yoshifumi Narumi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Practice policy and quality initiatives quality improvement and confirmation projects: facilitating rapid, measurable performance improvement.

Authors:  C Matthew Hawkins; Christopher N Alsip; Rebecca M Pryor; Alan D Leach; David B Larson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Automated extraction of radiation dose information for CT examinations.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Stefan Zimmerman; Andrew D A Maidment; Woojin Kim; William W Boonn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Maintenance of certification: update on attitudes of members of the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D M Yousem; A Nidecker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Maintenance of certification: part 2--continuous certification.

Authors:  Joshua A Hirsch; Gary J Becker; Colin P Derdeyn; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Vincent C Traynelis; Philip M Meyers
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience.

Authors:  Priyanka Prakash; Mannudeep K Kalra; Subba R Digumarthy; Jiang Hsieh; Homer Pien; Sarabjeet Singh; Matthew D Gilman; Jo-Anne O Shepard
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Using "iDose4" iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults' chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure.

Authors:  I Arapakis; E Efstathopoulos; V Tsitsia; S Kordolaimi; N Economopoulos; S Argentos; A Ploussi; E Alexopoulou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.