Literature DB >> 26992039

A Biodesigned Nanocomposite Biomaterial for Auricular Cartilage Reconstruction.

Leila Nayyer1, Gavin Jell1, Ali Esmaeili1,2, Martin Birchall3, Alexander M Seifalian1,2.   

Abstract

Current biomaterials for auricular replacement are associated with high rates of infection and extrusion. The development of new auricular biomaterials that mimic the mechanical properties of native tissue and promote desirable cellular interactions may prevent implant failure. A porous 3D nanocomposite scaffold (NS) based on POSS-PCU (polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocage into polycarbonate based urea-urethane) is developed with an elastic modulus similar to native ear. In vitro biological interactions on this NS reveal greater protein adsorption, increased fibroblast adhesion, proliferation, and collagen production compared with Medpor (the current synthetic auricular implant). In vivo, the POSS-PCU with larger pores (NS2; 150-250 μm) have greater tissue ingrowth (≈5.8× and ≈1.4 × increase) than the POSS-PCU with smaller pores (NS1; 100-50 μm) and when compared to Medpor (>100 μm). The NS2 with the larger pores demonstrates a reduced fibrotic encapsulation compared with NS1 and Medpor (≈4.1× and ≈1.6×, respectively; P < 0.05). Porosity also influences the amount of neovascularization within the implants, with no blood vessel observed in NS1 (12 weeks postimplantation). The lack of chronic inflammatory response for all materials may indicate that the elastic modulus and pore size of the implant scaffold could be important design considerations for influencing fibrotic responses to auricular and other soft tissue implants.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medpor; POSS-PCU; auricular cartilage; biomaterial; nanocomposite scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26992039     DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201500968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  8 in total

1.  Extended lateral thoracic fasciocutaneous biosynthetic flap for reconstruction of full-thickness partial external ear defects: an experimental study.

Authors:  Samet Vasfi Kuvat; Ümit Taşkın; Kadir Yücebaş; Hasan Deniz Tansuker; Mehmet Faruk Oktay; Erol Kozanoğlu; Salih Aydın
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Auricular reconstruction via 3D bioprinting strategies: An update.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Pradeep Kumar Yadav; Rahul Pandey; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 3.  Graphene Oxide: Opportunities and Challenges in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Pariya Zare; Mina Aleemardani; Amelia Seifalian; Zohreh Bagher; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Polyurethane/POSS Hybrids for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Jan Ozimek; Krzysztof Pielichowski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Osmotic core-shell polymeric implant for sustained BDNF AntagoNAT delivery in CNS using minimally invasive nasal depot (MIND) approach.

Authors:  Smrithi Padmakumar; Gregory Jones; Olga Khorkova; Jane Hsiao; Jonghan Kim; Benjamin S Bleier; Mansoor M Amiji
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Argon plasma improves the tissue integration and angiogenesis of subcutaneous implants by modifying surface chemistry and topography.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Robert Palgrave; Víctor G Baldovino-Medrano; Peter E Butler; Deepak M Kalaskar
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-10-08

7.  Silsesquioxane polymer as a potential scaffold for laryngeal reconstruction.

Authors:  Nazia Mehrban; James Bowen; Angela Tait; Arnold Darbyshire; Alex K Virasami; Mark W Lowdell; Martin A Birchall
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Design and fabrication of a hybrid alginate hydrogel/poly(ε-caprolactone) mold for auricular cartilage reconstruction.

Authors:  D O Visscher; A Gleadall; J K Buskermolen; F Burla; J Segal; G H Koenderink; M N Helder; P P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.368

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.