Literature DB >> 26991606

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Angelica A C Grasso1, Francesco A Mistretta1, Marco Sandri2, Gabriele Cozzi1, Elisa De Lorenzis1, Marco Rosso1, Giancarlo Albo1, Franco Palmisano1, Alex Mottrie3, Alexander Haese4, Markus Graefen4, Rafael Coelho5, Vipul R Patel5, Bernardo Rocco1,5.   

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction (PR) on early return of continence after radical prostatectomy (RP); an updated systematic review of the literature. A systematic review of the literature was performed in June 2015, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and searching Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases. We searched the terms posterior reconstruction prostatectomy, double layer anastomosis prostatectomy across the 'Title' and 'Abstract' fields of the records, with the following limits: humans, gender (male), and language (English). The authors reviewed the records to identify studies comparing cohorts of patients who underwent RP with or without restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. A meta-analysis of the risk ratios estimated using data from the selected studies was performed. In all, 21 studies were identified, including three randomised controlled trials. The overall analysis of comparative studies showed that PR improved early continence recovery at 3-7, 30, and 90 days after catheter removal, while the continence rate at 180 days was statistically but not clinically affected. Statistically significantly lower anastomotic leakage rates were described after PR. There were no significant differences for positive surgical margins rates or for complications such as acute urinary retention and bladder neck stricture. The analysis confirms the benefits at 30 days after catheter removal already discussed in the review published in 2012, but also shows a significant advantage in terms of urinary continence recovery in the first 90 days. A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial is currently being conducted in several institutions around the world to better assess the effectiveness of PR in facilitating an earlier recovery of postoperative urinary continence.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early continence; posterior musculofascial reconstruction; posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction; radical prostatectomy; urinary continence; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26991606     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  19 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: "Improvement in early continence after introduction of periurethral suspension stitch in robotic prostatectomy".

Authors:  Fabrizio Di Maida; Antonio Andrea Grosso; Luca Lambertini; Andrea Mari; Marco Carini; Andrea Minervini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-03-09

2.  Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qingyu Ge; Hewei Xu; Dezhou Yue; Zongyao Fan; Zhengsen Chen; Jie Xu; Yiduo Zhou; Sicong Zhang; Jun Xue; Baixin Shen; Zhongqing Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Nonhuman primate model of persistent erectile and urinary dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: Feasibility of minimally invasive therapy.

Authors:  Joao P Zambon; Manish Patel; Ashok Hemal; Gopal Badlani; Karl-Erik Andersson; Renata S Magalhaes; Shannon Lankford; Ashley Dean; James Koudy Williams
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Interrupted versus continuous suturing for vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karl Friedrich Kowalewski; Christian Tapking; Svetlana Hetjens; Felix Nickel; Philipp Mandel; Manuel Ritter; Maximilian Christian Kriegmair
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Surgical Techniques to Optimize Early Urinary Continence Recovery Post Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Mohammed Abozaid; Prabhakar Rajan; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Greg Shaw; Senthil Nathan; John D Kelly; Tim P Briggs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Effects of Progressive Resistance Training on Post-Surgery Incontinence in Men with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Juhyun Park; Dong Hyun Yoon; Sangjun Yoo; Sung Yong Cho; Min Chul Cho; Ga-Young Han; Wook Song; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Preservation of continence in radical prostatectomy patients: a laparoscopic surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Piotr Kania; Piotr Wośkowiak; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-01-17

8.  Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lan Cao; Zhenyu Yang; Lin Qi; Minfeng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Transvesical Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Hao Jiang; Xiaoqiang Liu; Luyao Chen; Weipeng Liu; Cheng Zhang; Xiaochen Zhou; Bin Fu; Gongxian Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Pelvic Floor Reconstruction After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Jianfeng Cui; Hu Guo; Yan Li; Shouzhen Chen; Yaofeng Zhu; Shiyu Wang; Yong Wang; Xigao Liu; Wenbo Wang; Jie Han; Pengxiang Chen; Shuping Nie; Gang Yin; Benkang Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.