OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly required as metrics for determining the efficacy of depression interventions. However, the scores obtained from self-reports over the course of treatment may be biased because respondents restructured the factors of the depression symptoms (reconceptualization), changed their values of the symptoms in reflecting depression (reprioritization), or adjusted their standards of assessing the levels of symptoms (recalibration). The aim of present study is to assess response shifts on the depression measure. METHOD: This study uses the procedures for assessing longitudinal measurement invariance to evaluate response shift effects on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) with 320 early adolescents suffering from depression (43.8% boys and 56.2% girls) over the course of their treatment in the school settings. RESULTS: The findings reveal clear signs of response shifts (recalibration) in the BDI-II for depressed students. Compared with the factor scores before treatment, the factor scores after treatment were underestimated, especially on the negative attitude and performance difficulty factors. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of treatment efficacy based on observed test scores appear to be confounded by response shifts.
OBJECTIVE:Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly required as metrics for determining the efficacy of depression interventions. However, the scores obtained from self-reports over the course of treatment may be biased because respondents restructured the factors of the depression symptoms (reconceptualization), changed their values of the symptoms in reflecting depression (reprioritization), or adjusted their standards of assessing the levels of symptoms (recalibration). The aim of present study is to assess response shifts on the depression measure. METHOD: This study uses the procedures for assessing longitudinal measurement invariance to evaluate response shift effects on the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) with 320 early adolescents suffering from depression (43.8% boys and 56.2% girls) over the course of their treatment in the school settings. RESULTS: The findings reveal clear signs of response shifts (recalibration) in the BDI-II for depressed students. Compared with the factor scores before treatment, the factor scores after treatment were underestimated, especially on the negative attitude and performance difficulty factors. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of treatment efficacy based on observed test scores appear to be confounded by response shifts.
Authors: Ingrid V E Carlier; Wessel A van Eeden; Kim de Jong; Erik J Giltay; Martijn S van Noorden; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Frans G Zitman; Henk Kelderman; Albert M van Hemert Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: M G E Verdam; W van Ballegooijen; C J M Holtmaat; H Knoop; J Lancee; F J Oort; H Riper; A van Straten; I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; M de Wit; T van der Zweerde; M A G Sprangers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240