Literature DB >> 26991076

A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.

Haitao Pan1,2, Ying Yuan1.   

Abstract

The Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method (CRM) is a Bayesian dose-finding design. It improves the robustness and overall performance of the continual reassessment method (CRM) by specifying multiple skeletons (or models) and then using Bayesian model averaging to automatically favor the best-fitting model for better decision making. Specifying multiple skeletons, however, can be challenging for practitioners. In this paper, we propose a default way to specify skeletons for the Bayesian model averaging CRM. We show that skeletons that appear rather different may actually lead to equivalent models. Motivated by this, we define a nonequivalence measure to index the difference among skeletons. Using this measure, we extend the model calibration method of Lee and Cheung (2009) to choose the optimal skeletons that maximize the average percentage of correct selection of the maximum tolerated dose and ensure sufficient nonequivalence among the skeletons. Our simulation study shows that the proposed method has desirable operating characteristics. We provide software to implement the proposed method.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMA-CRM; Bayesian adaptive design; continual reassessment method; maximum tolerated dose; skeleton specification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26991076      PMCID: PMC5026535          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression.

Authors:  Mario Stylianou; Nancy Flournoy
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  T Daimon; S Zohar; J O'Quigley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Isotonic designs for phase I trials.

Authors:  D H Leung; Y Wang
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-04

6.  Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for bivariate binary efficacy and toxicity outcomes in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Takashi Asakawa; Akihiro Hirakawa; Chikuma Hamada
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments.

Authors:  J Whitehead; H Brunier
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Shing M Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.486

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  A placebo-controlled Bayesian dose finding design based on continuous reassessment method with application to stroke research.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Mohammad H Rahbar; Md Monir Hossain; Ying Yuan; Nicole R Gonzales
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-05-06

2.  A web tool for designing and conducting phase I trials using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.

Authors:  G D James; S Symeonides; J Marshall; J Young; G Clack
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.