Literature DB >> 26990666

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence.

Mary T Paterno, Jessica E Draughon.   

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious concern for women that is associated with significant adverse health effects. Routine screening for IPV is recommended, but there are many barriers to screening that have been identified by providers, including discomfort, lack of training, and not knowing how to respond to a positive screen. This article reviews IPV screening and appropriate techniques for responding to a positive screen. IPV screening best practices include using a systematic protocol, developing a screening script, using a validated screening tool, and considerations for privacy and mandatory reporting. Responding to a positive screen should include acknowledging the experience, asking if the woman desires help, offering support and referrals, encouraging safety planning, and completing additional assessments to determine level of danger and to identify any comorbidities. Using these techniques along with therapeutic communication may increase IPV identification and create an environment in which women feel empowered to get help.
© 2016 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intimate partner violence; safety; women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26990666      PMCID: PMC6067906          DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  15 in total

1.  STaT: a three-question screen for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Anuradha Paranjape; Jane Liebschutz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Christina Bougatsos; Ian Blazina
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Intimate partner violence victimization prior to and during pregnancy among women residing in 26 U.S. states: associations with maternal and neonatal health.

Authors:  Jay G Silverman; Michele R Decker; Elizabeth Reed; Anita Raj
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Universal screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeff Todahl; Elaine Walters
Journal:  J Marital Fam Ther       Date:  2009-12-10

Review 5.  Screening and intervention for domestic violence during pregnancy care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca O'Reilly; Barbara Beale; Donna Gillies
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2010-08-05

6.  Women veterans' preferences for intimate partner violence screening and response procedures within the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Katherine M Iverson; Kristin Huang; Stephanie Y Wells; Jason D Wright; Megan R Gerber; Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  ACOG Committee opinion no. 554: reproductive and sexual coercion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Kim Madden; Nicole Simunovic; Katelyn Godin; Ngan K Pham; Mohit Bhandari; J C Goslings
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2012

9.  "They told me to leave": how health care providers address intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Diane S Morse; Ross Lafleur; Colleen T Fogarty; Mona Mittal; Catherine Cerulli
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy study in general practice.

Authors:  Hardip Sohal; Sandra Eldridge; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Two Patient-Centered Interventions for Women with Unmet Social Needs: Personalized Support for Progress and Enhanced Screening and Referral.

Authors:  Ellen Poleshuck; Marsha Wittink; Hugh F Crean; Iwona Juskiewicz; Elaine Bell; Amy Harrington; Catherine Cerulli
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Alcohol use, intimate partner violence, and HIV sexual risk behavior among young people in fishing communities of Lake Victoria, Uganda.

Authors:  Stephen Ojiambo Wandera; Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye; Eddy J Walakira; Peter Kisaakye; Jennifer Wagman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  How to Facilitate Disclosure of Violence while Delivering Perinatal Care: The Experience of Survivors and Healthcare Providers.

Authors:  Ann Pederson; Jila Mirlashari; Janet Lyons; Lori A Brotto
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  The Experiences of Women and Healthcare Providers in Assessing the History of Gender-Based Violence During Perinatal Care.

Authors:  Jila Mirlashari; Lori A Brotto; Janet Lyons; Ann Pederson
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Preconception Substance Use and Risk of Unintended Pregnancy: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016-17.

Authors:  Saima Shafique; Amna Umer; Kim E Innes; Toni Marie Rudisill; Wei Fang; Lesley Cottrell
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2022 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 4.647

6.  Background and Clinical Knowledge of Intimate Partner Violence: A Study of Primary Care Residents and Medical Students at a United States Medical School.

Authors:  Margaret Carlson; Akiko Kamimura; Sarah Al-Obaydi; Ha Ngoc Trinh; Kathy Franchek-Roa
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Gender-Based Violence in Adolescent Dating from a Medical Perspective: A Qualitative Study of the Needs Felt in Primary Healthcare Centres.

Authors:  Isabel Cuadrado-Gordillo; Guadalupe Martín-Mora Parra
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.