Cecile M Yelnik1, T Flint Porter2, D Ware Branch2, Carl A Laskin3, Joan T Merrill4, Marta M Guerra5, Michael D Lockshin5, Jill P Buyon6, Michelle Petri7, Lisa R Sammaritano5, Mary D Stephenson8, Mimi Y Kim9, Jane E Salmon5. 1. University of Lille, Lille, France. 2. University of Utah and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Carl A. Laskin, MD, University of Toronto and LifeQuest Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City. 5. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York. 6. New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 7. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 8. University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago. 9. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure variance in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) levels during pregnancy and to determine if variation affects pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We used data from the PROMISSE (Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) study, a multicenter prospective study of pregnant women with aPL and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Antiphospholipid antibodies were considered present if any of the following were positive: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2 -glycoprotein I (anti-β2 GPI) titers ≥40 IgG phospholipid (GPL) or IgM phospholipid (MPL) units, and/or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Antiphospholipid antibodies were measured every trimester and postpartum. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as fetal/neonatal death, preterm delivery (<36 weeks) due to preeclampsia or placental insufficiency, or growth restriction. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two aPL-positive patients were studied. Fifty-seven percent had clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 36% had SLE. IgG aPL levels were significantly lower during the second and third trimesters compared to initial screening, but IgG aCL and anti-β2 GPI remained high-positive through pregnancy in 93% of patients during the second trimester, and in 85% of patients during the third trimester. IgM aPL titers were negative in the majority of patients and decreased modestly during pregnancy among patients who were positive. LAC frequency also decreased, but 75% of patients remained positive through the second trimester. Only 4% of patients with aPL at baseline did not have aPL in either the second or third trimesters. Changes in aPL levels or aPL status were not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. LAC was the only aPL associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: The aPL in the cohort decreased marginally during pregnancy, and changes were not associated with pregnancy outcomes. Our results suggest that, among women with aPL and/or SLE, measuring aPL early in pregnancy is sufficient to assess risk. Repeat aPL testing through pregnancy is unnecessary.
OBJECTIVE: To measure variance in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) levels during pregnancy and to determine if variation affects pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We used data from the PROMISSE (Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) study, a multicenter prospective study of pregnant women with aPL and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Antiphospholipid antibodies were considered present if any of the following were positive: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2 -glycoprotein I (anti-β2 GPI) titers ≥40 IgG phospholipid (GPL) or IgM phospholipid (MPL) units, and/or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Antiphospholipid antibodies were measured every trimester and postpartum. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as fetal/neonatal death, preterm delivery (<36 weeks) due to preeclampsia or placental insufficiency, or growth restriction. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two aPL-positive patients were studied. Fifty-seven percent had clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 36% had SLE. IgG aPL levels were significantly lower during the second and third trimesters compared to initial screening, but IgG aCL and anti-β2 GPI remained high-positive through pregnancy in 93% of patients during the second trimester, and in 85% of patients during the third trimester. IgM aPL titers were negative in the majority of patients and decreased modestly during pregnancy among patients who were positive. LAC frequency also decreased, but 75% of patients remained positive through the second trimester. Only 4% of patients with aPL at baseline did not have aPL in either the second or third trimesters. Changes in aPL levels or aPL status were not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. LAC was the only aPL associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: The aPL in the cohort decreased marginally during pregnancy, and changes were not associated with pregnancy outcomes. Our results suggest that, among women with aPL and/or SLE, measuring aPL early in pregnancy is sufficient to assess risk. Repeat aPL testing through pregnancy is unnecessary.
Authors: S Miyakis; M D Lockshin; T Atsumi; D W Branch; R L Brey; R Cervera; R H W M Derksen; P G DE Groot; T Koike; P L Meroni; G Reber; Y Shoenfeld; A Tincani; P G Vlachoyiannopoulos; S A Krilis Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Jill P Buyon; Mimi Y Kim; Marta M Guerra; Carl A Laskin; Michelle Petri; Michael D Lockshin; Lisa Sammaritano; D Ware Branch; T Flint Porter; Allen Sawitzke; Joan T Merrill; Mary D Stephenson; Elisabeth Cohn; Lamya Garabet; Jane E Salmon Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: V Michael Holers; Guillermina Girardi; Lian Mo; Joel M Guthridge; Hector Molina; Silvia S Pierangeli; Ricardo Espinola; Liu E Xiaowei; Dailing Mao; Christopher G Vialpando; Jane E Salmon Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2002-01-21 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Jose Omar Latino; Sebastián Udry; Silvia Perés Wingeyer; Diego Fernández Romero; Paula Micone; Gabriela de Larrañaga Journal: Immunol Res Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.829
Authors: S Elbagir; N A Mohammed; H Kaihola; E Svenungsson; I Gunnarsson; V A Manivel; E Pertsinidou; E M Elagib; M A M Nur; E A Elussein; A Elshafie; H Åkerud; J Rönnelid Journal: Lupus Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.911