Literature DB >> 26990506

Endometrial Samples From Postmenopausal Women: A Proposal for Adequacy Criteria.

Ali Sakhdari1, Parnian A Moghaddam, Yuxin Liu.   

Abstract

Approximately 75% of endometrial cancer occurs in women older than 55 yr of age. Postmenopausal bleeding is often considered endometrial cancer until proven otherwise. One diagnostic challenge is that endometrial biopsy or curettage generally yields limited samples from elderly patients. There are no well-defined and unified diagnostic criteria for adequacy of endometrial samples. Pathologists who consider any sample including those lacking endometrial tissue as "adequate" run the risk of rendering false-negative reports; on the contrary, pathologists requiring ample endometrial glands along with stroma tend to designate a greater number of samples as "inadequate," leading to unnecessary follow-up. We undertook a quantitative study of 1768 endometrial samples from women aged 60 yr and older aiming to propose validated adequacy criteria for diagnosing or excluding malignancy. Using repeat-procedure outcomes as reference, we found that samples exceeding 10 endometrial strips demonstrated high negative predictive value close to 100%. Such samples can be scant, yet appear to be sufficient in excluding malignant conditions. When tissue diminished to <10 strips, negative predictive value dropped significantly to 81%. The risk of undersampled malignancy rose to 19%. Among 274 malignant cases, only 4 cases yielded limited tissue yet >10 strips. In conclusion, we propose 10 endometrial strips as the minimum for adequate samples from postmenopausal women. Applying such validated adequacy criteria will greatly reduce false-negative errors and avoid unnecessary procedures while ultimately improving diagnostic accuracy. Our criteria may serve as a reference point in unifying the pathology community on this important and challenging topic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26990506     DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  5 in total

1.  Endometrial sampling at an academic hospital in South Africa: Histological findings, lessons learnt and interesting surprises.

Authors:  Reena D Mohanlal
Journal:  Afr J Lab Med       Date:  2020-09-29

2.  A Clinical Comparative Study of Two Different Endometrial Cell Samplers for Evaluation of Endometrial Lesions by Cytopathological Diagnosis.

Authors:  Shulan Lv; Qing Wang; Yan Li; Lanbo Zhao; Yiran Wang; Xue Feng; Lu Han; Kailu Zhang; Panyue Yin; Huilian Hou; Guizhi Shi; Qiling Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Endometrial Cytology as a Method to Improve the Accuracy of Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: Case Report and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Qi Wang; Lanbo Zhao; Lu Han; Chao Sun; Sijia Ma; Huilian Hou; Qing Song; Qiling Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Agreement of histopathological findings of uterine curettage and hysterectomy specimens in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Sanam Moradan; Raheb Ghorbani; Azita Lotfi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Impact of endometrial sampling technique and biopsy volume on the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Federico Ferrari; Sara Forte; Giulia Arrigoni; Laura Ardighieri; Maria Consuelo Coppola; Federica Salinaro; Fabio Barra; Enrico Sartori; Franco Odicino
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.