| Literature DB >> 26990198 |
E Paterson1, P M Sanderson2, N A B Paterson3, D Liu4, R G Loeb5.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Our study examined the effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with acoustic tremolo and brightness to help listeners differentiate clinically relevant oxygen saturation ranges. In a series of trials lasting 30 s each, 76 undergraduate participants identified final oxygen saturation range ( TARGET: 100% to 97%; Low: 96% to 90%; Critical: 89% and below), and detected threshold transitions into and out of the target range using conventional sonification (n = 38) or enhanced sonification (n = 38). Median (IQR [range]) accuracy for range identification with the conventional sonification was 80 (70-85 [45-95])%, whereas with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (99-100 [80-100])%; p < 0.001. Accuracy for detecting threshold transitions with the conventional sonification was 60 (50-75 [30-95])%, but with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (95-100 [75-100]%; p < 0.001. Participants can identify clinically meaningful oxygen saturation ranges and detect threshold transitions more accurately with enhanced sonification than with conventional sonification.Entities:
Keywords: auditory alarms; auditory displays; patient monitoring; pulse oximetry; sonification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26990198 DOI: 10.1111/anae.13424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anaesthesia ISSN: 0003-2409 Impact factor: 6.955