Literature DB >> 26990178

Food availability and predation risk, rather than intrinsic attributes, are the main factors shaping the reproductive decisions of a long-lived predator.

Sarah R Hoy1, Alexandre Millon2, Steve J Petty1, D Philip Whitfield3, Xavier Lambin1.   

Abstract

Deciphering the causes of variation in reproductive success is a fundamental issue in ecology, as the number of offspring produced is an important driver of individual fitness and population dynamics. Little is known, however, about how different factors interact to drive variation in reproduction, such as whether an individual's response to extrinsic conditions (e.g. food availability or predation) varies according to its intrinsic attributes (e.g. age, previous allocation of resources towards reproduction). We used 29 years of reproductive data from marked female tawny owls and natural variation in food availability (field vole) and predator abundance (northern goshawk) to quantify the extent to which extrinsic and intrinsic factors interact to influence owl reproductive traits (breeding propensity, clutch size and nest abandonment). Extrinsic and intrinsic factors appeared to interact to affect breeding propensity (which accounted for 83% of the variation in owl reproductive success). Breeding propensity increased with vole density, although increasing goshawk abundance reduced the strength of this relationship. Owls became slightly more likely to breed as they aged, although this was only apparent for individuals who had fledged chicks the year before. Owls laid larger clutches when food was more abundant. When owls were breeding in territories less exposed to goshawk predation, 99·5% of all breeding attempts reached the fledging stage. In contrast, the probability of breeding attempts reaching the fledging stage in territories more exposed to goshawk predation depended on the amount of resources an owl had already allocated towards reproduction (averaging 87·7% for owls with clutches of 1-2 eggs compared to 97·5% for owls with clutches of 4-6 eggs). Overall, our results suggested that changes in extrinsic conditions (predominantly food availability, but also predator abundance) had the greatest influence on owl reproduction. In response to deteriorating extrinsic conditions (fewer voles and more goshawks), owls appeared to breed more frequently, but allocated fewer resources per breeding attempt. However, intrinsic attributes also appeared to have a relatively small influence on how an individual responded to variation in extrinsic conditions, which indicates that owl reproductive decisions were shaped by a complex series of extrinsic and intrinsic trade-offs.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accipiter gentilis; Strix aluco; breeding decisions; breeding propensity; clutch size; juvenile survival; life-history trade-offs; northern goshawk; reproductive strategies; tawny owl

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26990178     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  6 in total

1.  Senescence and carryover effects of reproductive performance influence migration, condition, and breeding propensity in a small shorebird.

Authors:  Chelsea Weithman; Daniel Gibson; Kelsi Hunt; Meryl Friedrich; James Fraser; Sarah Karpanty; Daniel Catlin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Bottom-up processes drive reproductive success in an apex predator.

Authors:  Joshua H Schmidt; Carol L McIntyre; Carl A Roland; Margaret C MacCluskie; Melanie J Flamme
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Food restriction affects maternal investment but not neonate phenotypes in a viviparous lizard.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Zhi-Gao Zeng; Liang Ma; Shu-Ran Li; Wei-Guo Du
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2017-03-18

4.  High quality diet improves lipid metabolic profile and breeding performance in the blue-footed booby, a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  Erick González-Medina; José Alfredo Castillo-Guerrero; Sharon Zinah Herzka; Guillermo Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatio-temporal variation in oxidative status regulation in a small mammal.

Authors:  Vincent Lemieux; Dany Garant; Denis Reale; Patrick Bergeron
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Can attraction to and competition for high-quality habitats shape breeding propensity?

Authors:  Paul Acker; Michael Schaub; Aurélien Besnard; Jean-Yves Monnat; Emmanuelle Cam
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.