Literature DB >> 26989978

Hospital charges associated with "never events": comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty.

Alan H Daniels1, Satoshi Kawaguchi2, Alec G Contag2, Farbod Rastegar2, Garrett Waagmeester2, Paul A Anderson3, Melanie Arthur4, Robert A Hart2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Beginning in 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) determined that certain hospital-acquired adverse events such as surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery should never occur. The following year, they expanded the ruling to include deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) following total joint arthroplasty. Due to their ruling that "never events" are not the payers' responsibility, CMS insists that the costs of managing these complications be borne by hospitals and health care providers, rather than billings to health care payers for additional care required in their management. Data comparing the expected costs of such adverse events in patients undergoing spine and orthopedic surgery have not previously been reported. METHODS The California State Inpatient Database (CA-SID) from 2008 to 2009 was used for the analysis. All patients with primary procedure codes indicating anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), lumbar laminectomy (LL), total knee replacement (TKR), and total hip replacement (THR) were analyzed. Patients with diagnostic and/or treatment codes for DVT, PE, and SSI were separated from patients without these complication codes. Patients with more than 1 primary procedure code or more than 1 complication code were excluded. Median charges for treatment from primary surgery through 3 months postoperatively were calculated. RESULTS The incidence of the examined adverse events was lowest for ACDF (0.6% DVT, 0.1% PE, and 0.03% SSI) and highest for TKA (1.3% DVT, 0.3% PE, 0.6% SSI). Median inpatient charges for uncomplicated LL was $51,817, compared with $73,432 for ACDF, $143,601 for PLIF, $74,459 for THR, and $70,116 for TKR. Charges for patients with DVT ranged from $108,387 for TKR (1.5 times greater than index) to $313,536 for ACDF (4.3 times greater than index). Charges for patients with PE ranged from $127,958 for TKR (1.8 times greater than index) to $246,637 for PLIF (1.7 times greater than index). Charges for patients with SSI ranged from $168,964 for TKR (2.4 times greater than index) to $385,753 for PLIF (2.7 times greater than index). CONCLUSIONS Although incidence rates are low, adverse events of spinal procedures substantially increase the cost of care. Charges for patients experiencing DVT, PE, and SSI increased in this study by factors ranging from 1.8 to 4.3 times those for patients without such complications across 5 common spinal and orthopedic procedures. Cost projections by health care providers will need to incorporate expected costs of added care for patients experiencing such complications, assuming that the cost burden of such events continues to shift from payers to providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; CA-SID = California State Inpatient Database; CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; HCUP = Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; ICD-9-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; LL = lumbar laminectomy; PE = pulmonary embolism; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; SSI = surgical site infection; THR = total hip replacement; TKR = total knee replacement; adverse event; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; complication; cost; deep vein thrombosis; hospital charge; infection; lumbar; never event

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26989978     DOI: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?

Authors:  Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications after 1-2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Brittany E Haws; Benjamin Khechen; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 3.  Implantable Device-Related Infection.

Authors:  J Scott VanEpps; John G Younger
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Thromboprophylaxis across orthopaedic surgery: Bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles.

Authors:  Anil Sedani; Ramakanth Yakkanti; Paul Allegra; Lavi Mattingly; Amiethab Aiyer
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-23

5.  Risk factors of cervical surgery related complications in patients older than 80 years.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura; Masaomi Yamashita; Yawara Eguchi; Shiro Imagama; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Morio Matsumoto; Ken Ishii; Tomohiro Hikata; Shoji Seki; Masaaki Aramomi; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Atsushi Kimura; Hirokazu Inoue; Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Wataru Saito; Kei Yamada; Michio Hongo; Kenji Endo; Hidekazu Suzuki; Atsushi Nakano; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Junichi Ohya; Hirotaka Chikuda; Yasuchika Aoki; Masayuki Shimizu; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Masaichi Hasegawa; Katsuhito Kiyasu; Haku Iizuka; Kotaro Nishida; Kenichiro Kakutani; Hideaki Nakajima; Hideki Murakami; Satoru Demura; Satoshi Kato; Katsuhito Yoshioka; Takashi Namikawa; Kei Watanabe; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Norihiro Nishida; Masataka Sakane; Masashi Yamazaki; Takashi Kaito; Takeo Furuya; Sumihisa Orita; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.