Literature DB >> 26989856

When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours.

Simon T Powers1,2, Laurent Lehmann1.   

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of sociality in humans and other species requires understanding how selection on social behaviour varies with group size. However, the effects of group size are frequently obscured in the theoretical literature, which often makes assumptions that are at odds with empirical findings. In particular, mechanisms are suggested as supporting large-scale cooperation when they would in fact rapidly become ineffective with increasing group size. Here we review the literature on the evolution of helping behaviours (cooperation and altruism), and frame it using a simple synthetic model that allows us to delineate how the three main components of the selection pressure on helping must vary with increasing group size. The first component is the marginal benefit of helping to group members, which determines both direct fitness benefits to the actor and indirect fitness benefits to recipients. While this is often assumed to be independent of group size, marginal benefits are in practice likely to be maximal at intermediate group sizes for many types of collective action problems, and will eventually become very small in large groups due to the law of decreasing marginal returns. The second component is the response of social partners on the past play of an actor, which underlies conditional behaviour under repeated social interactions. We argue that under realistic conditions on the transmission of information in a population, this response on past play decreases rapidly with increasing group size so that reciprocity alone (whether direct, indirect, or generalised) cannot sustain cooperation in very large groups. The final component is the relatedness between actor and recipient, which, according to the rules of inheritance, again decreases rapidly with increasing group size. These results explain why helping behaviours in very large social groups are limited to cases where the number of reproducing individuals is small, as in social insects, or where there are social institutions that can promote (possibly through sanctioning) large-scale cooperation, as in human societies. Finally, we discuss how individually devised institutions can foster the transition from small-scale to large-scale cooperative groups in human evolution.
© 2016 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  altruism; cooperation; cultural evolution; diminishing returns; group size; institutions; punishment; reciprocity; relatedness; sociality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26989856     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  10 in total

1.  Social learning and the demise of costly cooperation in humans.

Authors:  Maxwell N Burton-Chellew; Claire El Mouden; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  From disorganized equality to efficient hierarchy: how group size drives the evolution of hierarchy in human societies.

Authors:  Cedric Perret; Emma Hart; Simon T Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  How evolutionary behavioural sciences can help us understand behaviour in a pandemic.

Authors:  Megan Arnot; Eva Brandl; O L K Campbell; Yuan Chen; Juan Du; Mark Dyble; Emily H Emmott; Erhao Ge; Luke D W Kretschmer; Ruth Mace; Alberto J C Micheletti; Sarah Nila; Sarah Peacey; Gul Deniz Salali; Hanzhi Zhang
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2020-10-24

4.  Evolution of warfare by resource raiding favours polymorphism in belligerence and bravery.

Authors:  Charles Mullon; Laurent Lehmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Optimal strategies and cost-benefit analysis of the [Formula: see text]-player weightlifting game.

Authors:  Diane Carmeliza N Cuaresma; Erika Chiba; Jerrold M Tubay; Jomar F Rabajante; Maica Krizna A Gavina; Jin Yoshimura; Hiromu Ito; Takuya Okabe; Satoru Morita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Five decades of misunderstanding in the social Hymenoptera: a review and meta-analysis of Michener's paradox.

Authors:  Robert L Jeanne; Kevin J Loope; Andrew M Bouwma; Erik V Nordheim; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-25

7.  The evolution of mechanisms to produce phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms.

Authors:  Guy Alexander Cooper; Ming Liu; Jorge Peña; Stuart Andrew West
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Multilevel selection favors fragmentation modes that maintain cooperative interactions in multispecies communities.

Authors:  Gil J B Henriques; Simon van Vliet; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Experimental evidence that group size generates divergent benefits of cooperative breeding for male and female ostriches.

Authors:  Julian Melgar; Mads F Schou; Maud Bonato; Zanell Brand; Anel Engelbrecht; Schalk W P Cloete; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 8.713

10.  Social influences on survival and reproduction: Insights from a long-term study of wild baboons.

Authors:  Susan C Alberts
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.091

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.