| Literature DB >> 26989782 |
Cong Chen1, Zhensheng Tao1, Carlos Hernández-García2, Piotr Matyba1, Adra Carr1, Ronny Knut1, Ofer Kfir3, Dimitry Zusin1, Christian Gentry1, Patrik Grychtol1, Oren Cohen3, Luis Plaja4, Andreas Becker1, Agnieszka Jaron-Becker1, Henry Kapteyn1, Margaret Murnane1.
Abstract
Bright, circularly polarized, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and soft x-ray high-harmonic beams can now be produced using counter-rotating circularly polarized driving laser fields. Although the resulting circularly polarized harmonics consist of relatively simple pairs of peaks in the spectral domain, in the time domain, the field is predicted to emerge as a complex series of rotating linearly polarized bursts, varying rapidly in amplitude, frequency, and polarization. We extend attosecond metrology techniques to circularly polarized light by simultaneously irradiating a copper surface with circularly polarized high-harmonic and linearly polarized infrared laser fields. The resulting temporal modulation of the photoelectron spectra carries essential phase information about the EUV field. Utilizing the polarization selectivity of the solid surface and by rotating the circularly polarized EUV field in space, we fully retrieve the amplitude and phase of the circularly polarized harmonics, allowing us to reconstruct one of the most complex coherent light fields produced to date.Entities:
Keywords: High-harmonic generation, frequency conversion; attosecond metrology; circular harmonic generation.; time-resolved photoemission
Year: 2016 PMID: 26989782 PMCID: PMC4788484 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Characterizing circularly polarized HHG fields using a laser-dressed angle-resolved photoelectron spectrometer.
(A) Counter-rotating ω [780 nm, right circularly polarized (RCP)] and 2ω [390 nm, left circularly polarized (LCP)] beams from a Ti/Sapphire laser are focused into an Ar-filled hollow waveguide. The generated circular HHG and a time-delayed linearly polarized 780-nm dressing field are focused onto a clean Cu(111) surface. Here, a specific geometry is plotted for illustration, where the ŷ-pol component of circular HHG field is aligned with the normal direction of sample (). In experiments, the orientation of the circular HHG field can be rotated by adjusting the temporal delay between the ω and 2ω driving fields τRB. (B) Circularly polarized HHG spectrum recorded by an EUV spectrometer. The 13th and 16th harmonic orders are RCP, and the 14th and 17th orders are LCP. a.u., arbitrary unit. (C) Angle-resolved photoelectron spectrometer (ARPES) spectrum of Cu(111) excited by the circularly polarized HHG. The spectrum with momentum span is recorded by a hemispherical electron analyzer. The analyzer work function is 4.2 eV and correlates the photoelectron energy with photon energy. The direct photoemission pathways from Cu d band excited by the corresponding harmonic orders are labeled in the lower panel. k, momentum; E, Fermi level.
Fig. 2Photoelectron interferogram as a function of time delay between the circular HHG and linear IR field.
(A) Two-dimensional map of photoelectron yields as a function of photoelectron energy and pump-probe time delay. The selected lineouts on the right panel represent the photoelectron-intensity modulation at the photoelectron energies corresponding to direct photoemission from the Cu(111) d band excited by labeled HHG orders. (B) Schematic of the quantum paths that give rise to photoelectron interferences. (C) Fourier analysis of the photoelectron yield oscillations at energies corresponding to direct photoemission by 14ω and 15ω. The green area marks the frequency mask used to extract the phases of the ωL oscillations in (A).
Phases of circular harmonics along - and ŷ-pol (see Fig. 1A), obtained using a phase retrieval algorithm.
The uncertainty is determined as the SD of phase values retrieved from multiple trials (see the Supplementary Materials).
| 13th | 14th | 15th | 16th | 17th | 18th | |
| 0.0 | 0.57 ± 0.29 | 0.23 ± 0.58 | 0.97 ± 0.30 | −0.19 ± 0.30 | −1.87 ± 0.65 | |
| −1.65 ± 0.58 | 1.88 ± 0.44 | −2.32 ± 0.91 | −0.37 ± 0.56 | 2.31 ± 0.50 | 0.42 ± 0.48 | |
Fig. 3Experimental reconstruction of the circular HHG pulse train.
Three-dimensional field plot of the experimentally reconstructed pulse train of circular HHG, in direct comparison with our numerical simulation. The pulse train from theory is offset by −3 units along the E axis for illustration. Different colors (red, blue, and green) highlight the three linear bursts with different field orientations within each fundamental IR optical cycle (2.6 fs). The structure of three bursts and an IR optical cycle are also labeled on the ŷ projection of the electric field. The carrier field of the experimental pulse train is reconstructed by assuming the phase of the component of the 13th harmonic to be zero.
Fig. 4Field orientation and ellipticity of circular HHG from Ar.
(A) Field orientation and intensity profile of the experimentally reconstructed circular HHG pulse train. The orientation of each EUV burst, Φ, is defined as the angle of the electric field relative to the axis, as shown in the inset of (A). Φ is extracted by averaging the field orientation throughout each burst (see the Supplementary Materials). (B) Overall field intensity profile of the pulse train between −15 and 15 fs. The three-burst structure per IR optical cycle (2.6 fs) can be distinguished throughout the entire pulse train. The red curve represents the envelope of the pulse train with a full width at half maximum of ~8 fs. A zoom-in view between −3 and 3 fs is presented in (A). (C) Experimentally measured and theoretically calculated ellipticity of circular HHG from Ar (see the Supplementary Materials for the formula). The open blue diamonds are the simulation results with ε1 = 1.0 and ε2 = 0.92, where ε1 and ε2 are the ellipticities of 780- and 390-nm driving fields, respectively. The green dashed lines represent the results considering spin angular momentum conservation under a perturbative model by Fleischer et al. () and Pisanty et al. () (see the Supplementary Materials). The HHG spectrum obtained from the experiment is plotted in the lower panel.