| Literature DB >> 26989078 |
Xue Yang1, Minglei Zhuo1, Xin Ye2, Hua Bai1, Zhijie Wang1, Yun Sun2, Jun Zhao1, Tongtong An1, Jianchun Duan1, Meina Wu1, Jie Wang1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the feasibility of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the quantitative and dynamic detection of EGFR mutations and next generation sequencing (NGS) for screening EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance-relevant mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from advanced lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients.Entities:
Keywords: circulating tumor DNA; droplet digital PCR; epidermal growth factor receptor; next-generation sequencing; non-small-cell lung cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26989078 PMCID: PMC4991494 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Patients’ clinical characteristics (n = 73)
| Characteristics | No of Patients | % of patients |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | ||
| Median | 58 | |
| Range | 34–89 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 29 | 40 |
| Female | 44 | 60 |
| Smoking status | ||
| Never smoker | 53 | 73 |
| Former/current smoker | 20 | 27 |
| EGFR-TKIs treatment line | ||
| First line | 37 | 51 |
| Second or beyond | 36 | 49 |
| EGFR-TKIs failure modes | ||
| Dramatic PD | 23 | 34 |
| Slow PD | 44 | 66 |
EGFR: epithelial growth factor receptor; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor; PD: progression of disease.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) PFS and (B) OS according to qualitative analysis of sensitive EGFR mutation (19del or L858R) in TKI-naive plasma samples identified by ddPCR (n = 73)
MT: mutant type; WT: wild type.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) PFS and (B) OS according to quantitative analysis of sensitive EGFR mutation (19DEL or L858R) in TKI-naive plasma samples identified by ddPCR (n = 73)
Selected characteristics of patients with different abundances of EGFR mutations (n = 54)
| Variables | EGFR abundance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low abundance ( | High abundance ( | ||||
| % | % | ||||
| Age | |||||
| < 65 y | 21 | 77.8 | 21 | 77.8 | |
| ≥ 65 y | 6 | 22.2 | 6 | 22.2 | |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 10 | 37.0 | 13 | 48.1 | |
| Female | 17 | 63.0 | 14 | 51.9 | |
| Smoking History | |||||
| Former smoker | 6 | 22.2 | 9 | 33.3 | |
| Never smoker | 21 | 77.8 | 18 | 66.7 | |
| EGFR-TKIs treatment line | |||||
| First line | 15 | 55.6 | 9 | 33.3 | |
| Second or beyond | 12 | 44.4 | 18 | 66.6 | |
| DCR | |||||
| PR | 13 | 48.1 | 11 | 40.7 | |
| SD | 14 | 51.9 | 16 | 59.3 | |
Notes: factors were tested by χ2 test.
Abbreviations: EGFR, epithelial growth factor receptor; TKIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; DCR, disease control rate; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) PFS and (B) OS according to dynamic changes of EGFR abundance in plasma samples by identified ddPCR (n = 67)
Association between clinical features and PFS using multivariate analysis
| P | HR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous treatment | EGFR-TKI first line | 0.016 | 0.514 | 0.298–0.885 |
| Number of metastatic sites | 1 | 0.009 | ||
| 2 | 0.359 | 1.351 | 0.710–2.572 | |
| 3+ | 0.002 | 2.634 | 1.420–4.884 | |
| EGFR mutation status | Negative | 0.000 | ||
| Low abundance | 0.000 | 0.122 | 0.057–0.258 | |
| High abundance | 0.000 | 0.066 | 0.030–0.149 |
HR: hazard ration; CI: confidence interval.
Patient characteristics and NGS monitoring results in 12 cases
| Patient ID | Gender | Age | Histology | Smoking status | Tumor stage | Best response | PFS (months) | N. of Somatic SNV | N. of Somatic InDel | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | C3 | C4 | PD | PD6 | baseline | C3 | C4 | PD | PD6 | ||||||||
| 1 | F | 46 | Adeno | N | IV | PR | 19.4 | 8 | - | - | 10 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 4 | M | 80 | Adeno | N | IV | PR | 17.3 | 5 | - | - | 6 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 8 | M | 59 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 18.2 | 4 | - | - | 5 | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | - |
| 10 | F | 53 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 8.6 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
| 14 | M | 87 | Adeno | Y | IV | SD | 17.7 | 7 | - | - | 11 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 16 | M | 54 | Adeno | Y | IV | SD | 12.4 | 1 | - | - | 10 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 17 | F | 34 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 3.3 | 4 | - | - | 6 | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | - |
| 23 | M | 73 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 9.6 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 24 | F | 73 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 8.5 | 4 | - | - | 5 | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | - |
| 25 | F | 65 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 6.7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | - |
| 27 | F | 65 | Adeno | N | IV | SD | 9.8 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 29 | F | 65 | Adeno | N | IV | PR | 5.7 | 8 | - | - | 9 | 9 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 0 |
Dashes indicate that plasma was not available.
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; Adeno, adenocarcinoma; Y, Yes; N, No;
PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease;
C3,taking during the third months in TKI treatment;
C4, taking during the fourth months in TKI treatment; PD, progression of disease;
PD6, six months after disease progression.
Figure 4Heat map of meaningful mutant genes in ctDNA from 12 patients using next generation sequencing
Figure 5Dynamic changes of total mutational copies and frequencies in ctDNA detected by NGS
Abbreviation: Baseline, plasma sampling before TKI treatment; C3, plasma sampling during the third months in TKI treatment; C4, plasma sampling during the fourth months in TKI treatment; PD, plasma sampling at the time of disease progression.
Figure 6Signaling pathways detected by NGS
Mutations involved in DNA damage checkpoint were shown in red, and mutations involved with TGF-β pathway were shown in blue.
Figure 7Comparison between NGS and ddPCR in measuring relative abundance of EGFR mutation in ctDNA
(A–J) Allele frequency (AF) of EGFR mutations in each patient. The dashed line indicates AF measured by ddPCR, and the solid line indicates AF measured by NGS. EGFR mutation was shown in red line, while T790M was shown in blue line. PD, progressive disease; (K) Concordance between NGS and ddPCR in measuring relative abundance of EGFR mutation in ctDNA (R2 = 0.953).