Literature DB >> 26988291

Evaluating structured assessment of anaesthesiologists' non-technical skills.

R M H G Jepsen1, P Dieckmann1, L Spanager1, H T Lyk-Jensen1, L Konge2, C Ringsted3, D Østergaard1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-technical skills (NTS) are essential for safe and efficient anaesthesia. Assessment instruments with appropriate validity evidence can be used to ensure that anaesthesiologists possess the NTS necessary to deliver high-standard patient care. The aims were to collect validity evidence using a contemporary validity framework for the assessment instrument Anaesthesiologists' Non-Technical Skills in Denmark (ANTSdk) regarding response process and internal structure (including reliability), and to investigate the effect of rater training on these properties.
METHODS: An explorative study was undertaken at the Danish Institute for Medical Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark. In a 1-day session, using ANTSdk, a convenience sample of 19 anaesthesiologists rated trainee anaesthesiologists' NTS in nine video-recorded simulation scenarios before and after a 3-h training session.
RESULTS: Response process evidence: participants considered ANTSdk useful and feasible for NTS assessment. Internal structure evidence: inter-rater reliability (single measures) largely expressed substantial agreement (ICC ≥ 0.55 and ICC ≥ 0.60 for pre- and post-training ratings respectively). Strong internal consistency of ratings was found (Spearman's correlation coefficient ≥ 0.82). Accuracy of participants' ratings compared with reference ratings (± 1 scale point) was notable (76% and 78% for pre- and post-training ratings, respectively). The results indicate that the elements 'Demonstrating self-awareness', 'Reassessing decisions', 'Assessing competencies', and 'Supporting others' need more attention in future rater training.
CONCLUSION: The validity evidence collected on content, response process, and internal structure, suggests that ANTSdk is easy to use on video-recorded simulation scenarios, indicating that ANTSdk is a feasible instrument for NTS assessment during anaesthesia training.
© 2016 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26988291     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  2 in total

1.  Measuring non-technical skills of anaesthesiologists in the operating room: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties.

Authors:  S Boet; S Larrigan; L Martin; H Liu; K J Sullivan; Cole Etherington
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 11.719

2.  Development and Evaluation of the Taxonomy of Trauma Leadership Skills-Shortened for Observation and Reflection in Training: A Practical Tool for Observing and Reflecting on Trauma Leadership Performance.

Authors:  Nico F Leenstra; Oliver C Jung; Fokie Cnossen; A Debbie C Jaarsma; Jaap E Tulleken
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.690

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.