Literature DB >> 26988228

Preferences for the organization of long-term follow-up in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

Salome Christen1, Janine Vetsch1, Luzius Mader1, Silvia Dehler2, Dimitri Korol2, Claudia Kuehni3, Corina S Rueegg1, Gisela Michel4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As survival rates of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients increase, a growing number of AYA cancer survivors need follow-up care. However, there is little research on their preferences for follow-up care. We aimed to (1) describe AYA cancer survivors' preferences for the organization and content of follow-up care, (2) describe their preferences for different models of follow-up, and (3) investigate clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with preferences for the different models.
METHODS: AYA cancer survivors (diagnosed with cancer at age 16-25 years; ≥5 years after diagnosis) were identified through the Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug. Survivors completed a questionnaire on follow-up attendance, preferences for organizational aspects of follow-up care (what is important during follow-up, what should be included during appointments, what specialists should be involved, location), models of follow-up (telephone/questionnaire, general practitioner (GP), pediatric oncologist, medical oncologist, multidisciplinary team), and sociodemographic characteristics. Information on tumor and treatment was available through the Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug.
RESULTS: Of 389 contacted survivors, 160 (41.1 %) participated and 92 (57.5 %) reported still attending follow-up. Medical aspects of follow-up care were more important than general aspects (p < 0.001). Among different organizational models, follow-up by a medical oncologist was rated higher than all other models (p = 0.002). Non-attenders of follow-up rated GP-led follow-up significantly higher than attenders (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Swiss AYA cancer survivors valued medical content of follow-up and showed a preference for medical oncologist-led follow-up. Implementation of different models of follow-up care might improve accessibility and attendance among AYA cancer survivors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AYA; Adolescent and young adult cancer survivors; Long-term follow-up; Models of care; Preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26988228     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3157-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  20 in total

1.  Cohort profile: the Swiss childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Claudia E Kuehni; Corina S Rueegg; Gisela Michel; Cornelia E Rebholz; Marie-Pierre F Strippoli; Felix K Niggli; Matthias Egger; Nicolas X von der Weid
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Late effects in survivors of teenage and young adult cancer: does age matter?

Authors:  E Woodward; M Jessop; A Glaser; D Stark
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Models of care for survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Debra L Friedman; David R Freyer; Gill A Levitt
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Predictors of clinic satisfaction among adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kate Absolom; Diana Greenfield; Richard Ross; Beverly Horne; Helena Davies; Adam Glaser; Adrian Simpson; Heather Waite; Christine Eiser
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Follow-up care after childhood cancer: survivors' expectations and preferences for care.

Authors:  G Michel; D M Greenfield; K Absolom; R J Ross; H Davies; C Eiser
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Childhood cancer survivor care: development of the Passport for Care.

Authors:  David G Poplack; Michael Fordis; Wendy Landier; Smita Bhatia; Melissa M Hudson; Marc E Horowitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995-2002.

Authors:  Gemma Gatta; Giulia Zigon; Riccardo Capocaccia; Jan Willem Coebergh; Emmanuel Desandes; Peter Kaatsch; Guido Pastore; Rafael Peris-Bonet; Charles A Stiller
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Ann C Mertens; Charles A Sklar; Toana Kawashima; Melissa M Hudson; Anna T Meadows; Debra L Friedman; Neyssa Marina; Wendy Hobbie; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Cindy L Schwartz; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 176.079

9.  Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the AYA HOPE Study.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Charles F Lynch; Theresa H M Keegan; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Ikuko Kato; Michele M West; Rosemary D Cress; Stephen M Schwartz; Ashley W Smith; Dennis Deapen; Sonja M Stringer; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Can intensity of long-term follow-up for survivors of childhood and teenage cancer be determined by therapy-based risk stratification?

Authors:  A B Edgar; K Duffin; S Borthwick; P Marciniak-Stepak; W H Wallace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based recommendations for the organization of long-term follow-up care for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a report from the PanCareSurFup Guidelines Working Group.

Authors:  Gisela Michel; Renée L Mulder; Helena J H van der Pal; Roderick Skinner; Edit Bárdi; Morven C Brown; Janine Vetsch; Eva Frey; Rachael Windsor; Leontien C M Kremer; Gill Levitt
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Age-Specific Patient Navigation Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.

Authors:  Samantha T Pannier; Echo L Warner; Brynn Fowler; Douglas Fair; Sara K Salmon; Anne C Kirchhoff
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Realist Review of Care Models That Include Primary Care for Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Claire Snyder; Youngjee Choi; Katherine C Smith; Renee F Wilson; Christina T Yuan; Paul C Nathan; Allen Zhang; Karen A Robinson
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients' perspective.

Authors:  V Lang; S Walter; J Fessler; M J Koester; D Ruetters; J Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Introducing a time out consultation with the general practitioner between diagnosis and start of colorectal cancer treatment: Patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Thijs Wieldraaijer; Marike de Meij; Sophie Zwaard; Henk van Weert; Jan Wind
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Colorectal cancer patients' preferences for type of caregiver during survivorship care.

Authors:  T Wieldraaijer; L A M Duineveld; S C Donkervoort; W B Busschers; H C P M van Weert; J Wind
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 7.  Recommendations for the surveillance of cancer-related fatigue in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.

Authors:  Salome Christen; Katharina Roser; Renée L Mulder; Anica Ilic; Hanne C Lie; Jacqueline J Loonen; Anneli V Mellblom; Leontien C M Kremer; Melissa M Hudson; Louis S Constine; Roderick Skinner; Katrin Scheinemann; Jordan Gilleland Marchak; Gisela Michel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Impact of the model of long-term follow-up care on adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance among survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers.

Authors:  Dalia Kagramanov; Rinku Sutradhar; Cindy Lau; Zhan Yao; Jason D Pole; Nancy N Baxter; Sumit Gupta; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.