Literature DB >> 26987711

An evaluation of the role of concomitant anomalies on the outcomes of fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Adesola C Akinkuotu1, Stephanie M Cruz1, Darrell L Cass2, Timothy C Lee1, Christopher I Cassady3, Amy R Mehollin-Ray3, Rodrigo Ruano4, Stephen E Welty5, Oluyinka O Olutoye6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of various types of associated anomalies on CDH mortality and morbidity.
METHODS: All CDH patients at a tertiary care center from January 2004 to January 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Isolated CDH was defined as CDH without any associated anomalies. Cardiac anomalies were stratified into minor and major based on the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (RACHS-1) scoring system. Other anatomic anomalies requiring intervention in the perinatal period were classified as major anomalies. The outcomes of interest were 6-month mortality as well as pulmonary and gastrointestinal morbidity.
RESULTS: Of 189 CDH patients, 93 (49%) had isolated CDH. Others had: cardiac anomalies alone (n=47, 25%), genetic anomalies (n=28, 15%), structural anomalies alone (n=18, 10%), and both cardiac and genetic anomalies (n=20, 11%). Fifty (26.5%) patients were dead before six months of age. Mortality rate at 6months was higher in patients with genetic and major cardiac anomalies. A major cardiac anomaly was independently associated with a 102-fold increased risk of mortality at 6months (95%CI: 3.1-3402). Pulmonary morbidity was increased in patients with genetic, major cardiac, and major structural anomalies, while gastrointestinal morbidity was higher in patients with major structural anomalies alone.
CONCLUSION: Major cardiac and genetic anomalies were associated with increased 6-month mortality in CDH patients. However, the association with minor cardiac anomalies and/or structural anomalies did not affect mortality and morbidity of CDH patients. The presence of minor anomalies should not adversely impact their perinatal management or consideration for in-utero therapy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital anomalies; Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Isolated CDH

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987711     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

Review 1.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Amy R Mehollin-Ray
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30

2.  Fetal echocardiography (ECHO) in assessment of structural heart defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients: Is early postnatal ECHO necessary for ECMO candidacy?

Authors:  Candace C Style; Oluyinka O Olutoye; Mariatu A Verla; Keila N Lopez; Adam M Vogel; Patricio E Lau; Stephanie M Cruz; Jimmy Espinoza; Caraciolo J Fernandes; Sundeep G Keswani; Timothy C Lee
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Prenatal intervention for the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Mariatu A Verla; Candace C Style; Oluyinka O Olutoye
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Spontaneous breathing approach in mild congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A resuscitation algorithm.

Authors:  Emily J J Horn-Oudshoorn; Ronny Knol; Suzan C M Cochius-den Otter; Arjan B Te Pas; Stuart B Hooper; Calum T Roberts; Neysan Rafat; Thomas Schaible; Willem P de Boode; Robin van der Lee; Anne Debeer; Florian Kipfmueller; Charles C Roehr; Irwin K M Reiss; Philip L J DeKoninck
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.569

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.