| Literature DB >> 26986200 |
Elias Taylor Durgante Severo1,2, Fred Willians Calonego1, Cláudio Angeli Sansígolo1, Brian Bond2.
Abstract
In this study the effect of thermal treatment on the equilibrium moisture content, chemical composition and biological resistance to decay fungi of juvenile and mature Hevea brasiliensis wood (rubber wood) was evaluated. Samples were taken from a 53-year-old rubber wood plantation located in Tabapuã, Sao Paulo, Brazil. The samples were thermally-modified at 180°C, 200°C and 220°C. Results indicate that the thermal modification caused: (1) a significant increase in the extractive content and proportional increase in the lignin content at 220°C; (2) a significant decrease in the equilibrium moisture content, holocelluloses, arabinose, galactose and xylose content, but no change in glucose content; and (3) a significant increase in wood decay resistance against both Pycnoporus sanguineus (L.) Murrill and Gloeophyllum trabeum (Pers.) Murrill decay fungi. The greatest decay resistance was achieved from treatment at 220°C which resulted in a change in wood decay resistance class from moderately resistant to resistant. Finally, this study also demonstrated that the influence of thermal treatment in mature wood was lower than in juvenile wood.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26986200 PMCID: PMC4795606 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Chemical properties of juvenile and mature woods of Hevea brasiliensis thermally modified at various temperatures.
| Properties | Treatment temperature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 180°C | 200°C | 220°C | |
| Extractives (%) | ||||
| | 13.0 | 32.7 | 20.0 | 18.7 |
| | 5.96 a | 8.51 b | 10.86 b | 11.84 b |
| | 42.8 | 82.2 | 98.7 | |
| | 2.9 | 38.0 | 19.4 | 15.8 |
| | 5.83 a | 8.24 b | 8.06 b | 9.55 b |
| | 41.3 | 38.3 | 63.8 | |
| | -2.2 * | -3.2 * | -25.8 * | -19.3 * |
| Klason L. (%) | ||||
| | 10.0 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 22.1 |
| | 19.25 a | 19.74 a | 19.05 a | 23.45 a |
| | 2.5 | -1.0 | 21.8 | |
| | 7.1 | 14.5 | 13.0 | 24.4 |
| | 18.18 a | 17.81 a | 17.85 a | 21.95 b |
| | -2.0 | -1.8 | 20.7 | |
| | -5.6 NS | -9.8 NS | -6.3 NS | -6.4 NS |
| Holocellul. (%) | ||||
| | 5.8 | 5.3 | 8.4 | 7.3 |
| | 73.55 a | 72.28 a | 68.84 a | 61.57 b |
| | -1.7 | -6.4 | -16.3 | |
| | 6.9 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 6.5 |
| | 73.89 a | 74.34 a | 74.60 a | 68.86 b |
| | 0.6 | 1.0 | -6.8 | |
| | 0.5 | 2.9 | 8.4 | 11.8 |
| Arabinose (%) | ||||
| | 8.7 | 27.8 | 6.2 | 68.2 |
| | 0.23 a | 0.15 b | 0.12 bc | 0.09 c |
| | -34.8 | -47.8 | -60.9 | |
| | 20.7 | 21.1 | 29.0 | 31.5 |
| | 0.19 a | 0.16 b | 0.12 bc | 0.09 c |
| | -15.8 | -36.8 | -52.6 | |
| | -17.4 NS | 6.7 NS | 0.0 NS | 0.0 NS |
| Galactose (%) | ||||
| | 14.2 | 58.3 | 137.8 | |
| | 0.19 a | 0.11 ab | 0.04 bc | 0.00 c |
| | -42.1 | -78.9 | -100.0 | |
| | 34.3 | 97.2 | 145.9 | |
| | 0.19 a | 0.10 ab | 0.06 bc | 0.00 c |
| | -47.4 | -68.4 | -100.0 | |
| | 0.0 NS | -9.1 NS | 50.0 NS | 0.0 NS |
| Xylose (%) | ||||
| | 8.7 | 22.6 | 10.9 | 31.6 |
| | 13.45 a | 12.34 a | 11.55 ab | 8.78 b |
| | -8.3 | -14.1 | -34.7 | |
| | 16.5 | 17.8 | 15.3 | 17.2 |
| | 11.51 a | 11.65 a | 11.13 ab | 9.73 b |
| | 1.2 | -3.3 | -15.5 | |
| | -14.4 NS | -5.6 NS | -3.6 NS | 10.8 NS |
| Mannose (%) | ||||
| | ||||
| | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| | ||||
| | ||||
| Glucose (%) | ||||
| | 8.2 | 9.5 | 11.3 | 5.2 |
| | 59.69 a | 59.68 a | 57.12 a | 52.10 a |
| | 0.0 | -4.3 | -11.7 | |
| | 9.6 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| | 62.00 a | 62.44 a | 63.28 a | 59.04 a |
| | 0.7 | 2.1 | -4.8 | |
| | 3.9 | 4.6 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
Where: JW—juvenile wood; MW—mature wood; C.V.—coefficient of variation; Avg.—average; ND—non-detected; ↑—increase; ↓—reduction; different letters—significant difference by Scheirer-Ray-Hare and Tukey tests at 5% significance between thermal treatment, to galactose and all others variables, respectively
*—significant difference by “F” test at 5% significance between juvenile and mature woods; same letters and NS, non-significant difference.
Effect of thermal modification on the biological durability of juvenile and mature woods from Hevea brasiliensis at fungi Picnoporus sanguineous and Gloeophyllum trabeum.
| Properties | Treatment temperature | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 180°C | 200°C | 220°C | |
| Initial EMC (%) | ||||
| | 4.0 | 5.9 | 8.3 | 11.1 |
| | 8.56 a | 7.93 b | 7.35 b | 6.27 c |
| | -7.4 | -14.1 | -26.8 | |
| | 3.9 | 5.6 | 6.0 | 11.0 |
| | 9.00 a | 7.82 b | 7.75 b | 6.35 c |
| | -13.1 | -13.9 | -29.4 | |
| | 5.1 | -1.4 | 5.4 | 1.3 |
| Weight loss (%) | ||||
| | 20.9 | 23.1 | 26.9 | 24.5 |
| | 37.24 a | 31.15 ab | 27.80 b | 23.70 b |
| | -16.4 | -25.3 | -36.4 | |
| | 14.9 | 12.9 | 17.4 | 21.7 |
| | 40.78 a | 41.43 ab | 39.58 b | 35.84 b |
| | 1.6 | -2.9 | -12.1 | |
| | 9.5 | 33.0 | 42.4 | 51.2 |
| Initial EMC (%) | ||||
| | 4.5 | 6.2 | 6.5 | 16.0 |
| | 8.90 a | 7.60 b | 7.47 b | 6.12 c |
| | -14.6 | -16.1 | -31.2 | |
| | 4.6 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 6.3 |
| | 8.92 a | 8.11 b | 7.80 b | 6.13 c |
| | -9.1 | -12.6 | -31.3 | |
| | 0.2 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 0.2 |
| Weight loss (%) | ||||
| | 32.9 | 60.2 | 50.3 | 53.1 |
| | 29.26 a | 19.79 b | 13.83 bc | 9.21 c |
| | -32.4 | -52.7 | -68.5 | |
| | 34.1 | 69.4 | 29.2 | 60.5 |
| | 27.56 a | 25.65 a | 25.01 a | 11.36 b |
| | -6.9 | -9.3 | -58.8 | |
| | -5.8 NS | 29.6 NS | 80.8 | 23.3 NS |
Where: EMC—equilibrium moisture content; JW—juvenile wood; MW—mature wood; C.V.—coefficient of variation; Avg.—average; ND—non-detected; ↑—increase; ↓—reduction; different letters—significant difference by Tukey test at 5% significance between thermal treatment
*—significant difference by “F” test at 5% significance between juvenile and mature woods; same letters and NS—non-significant difference.