Karissa G Miller1, Aidan G C Wright2, Laurel M Peterson3, Thomas W Kamarck4, Barbara A Anderson5, Clemens Kirschbaum6, Anna L Marsland7, Matthew F Muldoon8, Stephen B Manuck9. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: kgm18@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: aidan@pitt.edu. 3. Department of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010, USA. Electronic address: lmpeterson@brynmawr.edu. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: tkam@pitt.edu. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: baa1@pitt.edu. 6. Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: clemens.kirschbaum@gmx.de. 7. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: marsland@pitt.edu. 8. Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. Electronic address: mfm10@pitt.edu. 9. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: manuck@pitt.edu.
Abstract
Inter-individual variability in metrics of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) activity, such as the slope of the diurnal decline in cortisol, cortisol awakening response (CAR), and total cortisol output, have been found to associate inversely with trait ratings of extraversion and positive affect (E/PA) and positively with neuroticism and negative affect (N/NA) in some, but not all, investigations. These inconsistencies may partly reflect varied intensity of cortisol sampling among studies and reliance on self-rated traits, which are subject to reporting biases and limitations of introspection. Here, we further examined dispositional correlates of HPA activity in 490 healthy, employed midlife volunteers (M age=43 years; 54% Female; 86% white). Trait ratings were requested from participants and 2 participant-elected informants using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and Extraversion and Neuroticism dimensions of NEO personality inventories. CAR was assessed as percent increase in cortisol levels from awakening to 30min after awakening; and the diurnal slope and total output of cortisol [Area Under the Curve (AUC)] were determined from cortisol measurements taken at awakening, +4 and +9h later, and bedtime, across 3 workdays. Structural equation modeling was used to estimate multi-informant E/PA and N/NA factors. We used 3days of measurement as indicators to model each of the three latent cortisol factors (slope, CAR, and AUC). With the two latent emotionality and three latent cortisol indices included there was good fit to the data (χ(2)(200)=278.38, p=0.0002; RMSEA=0.028, 90% CI=0.02-0.04; CFI/TLI=0.97/0.96; SRMR=0.04). After controlling for covariates (age, sex, race), results showed higher latent E/PA associated with a steeper diurnal slope (Standardized β=-0.19, p=0.02) and smaller CAR (Standardized β=-0.26, p=0.004), whereas N/NA did not associate with any cortisol metric (Standardized β's=-0.12 to 0.13, p's=0.10 to 0.53). These findings suggest that positive emotionality may be more closely associated with indices of diurnal cortisol release than negative emotionality.
Inter-individual variability in metrics of pan class="Disease">hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) activity, such as the slope of the diurnal decline in n>n class="Chemical">cortisol, cortisol awakening response (CAR), and total cortisol output, have been found to associate inversely with trait ratings of extraversion and positive affect (E/PA) and positively with neuroticism and negative affect (N/NA) in some, but not all, investigations. These inconsistencies may partly reflect varied intensity of cortisol sampling among studies and reliance on self-rated traits, which are subject to reporting biases and limitations of introspection. Here, we further examined dispositional correlates of HPA activity in 490 healthy, employed midlife volunteers (M age=43 years; 54% Female; 86% white). Trait ratings were requested from participants and 2 participant-elected informants using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and Extraversion and Neuroticism dimensions of NEO personality inventories. CAR was assessed as percent increase in cortisol levels from awakening to 30min after awakening; and the diurnal slope and total output of cortisol [Area Under the Curve (AUC)] were determined from cortisol measurements taken at awakening, +4 and +9h later, and bedtime, across 3 workdays. Structural equation modeling was used to estimate multi-informant E/PA and N/NA factors. We used 3days of measurement as indicators to model each of the three latent cortisol factors (slope, CAR, and AUC). With the two latent emotionality and three latent cortisol indices included there was good fit to the data (χ(2)(200)=278.38, p=0.0002; RMSEA=0.028, 90% CI=0.02-0.04; CFI/TLI=0.97/0.96; SRMR=0.04). After controlling for covariates (age, sex, race), results showed higher latent E/PA associated with a steeper diurnal slope (Standardized β=-0.19, p=0.02) and smaller CAR (Standardized β=-0.26, p=0.004), whereas N/NA did not associate with any cortisol metric (Standardized β's=-0.12 to 0.13, p's=0.10 to 0.53). These findings suggest that positive emotionality may be more closely associated with indices of diurnal cortisol release than negative emotionality.
Authors: Aafke van Santen; Sophie A Vreeburg; A J Willem Van der Does; Philip Spinhoven; Frans G Zitman; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Deborah E Polk; Sheldon Cohen; William J Doyle; David P Skoner; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Lotte Gerritsen; Mirjam I Geerlings; Marijke A Bremmer; Aartjan T F Beekman; Dorly J H Deeg; Brenda W J H Penninx; Hannie C Comijs Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Kristina D Dickman; Mark C Thomas; Barbara Anderson; Stephen B Manuck; Thomas W Kamarck Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Sami Ouanes; Enrique Castelao; Armin von Gunten; Pedro M Vidal; Martin Preisig; Julius Popp Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 5.750