Literature DB >> 26986046

Arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair: functional outcome, repair integrity, and preoperative factors related to postoperative outcome.

Nathan Rimmke1, Tristan Maerz2, Ross Cooper2, Sailaja Yadavalli3, Kyle Anderson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the retear rate, retear size and location, the clinical impact of a retear, and preoperative patient factors related to postoperative outcome after arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair.
METHODS: Fifty six patients with an isolated, full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear who underwent arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair were retrospectively identified. Patients were evaluated and rotator cuff integrity was assessed using ultrasonography. Visual analog score (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, shoulder range of motion and strength were used for clinical evaluation. Retears were assessed for size and location on ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Forty two patients (75%) aged a mean 59.7 ± 8.6 years (range 41-79 years) were available for follow-up at a mean 13.5 months. Postoperative evaluation indicated significant improvements in ASES score (49.76 ± 18.2 to 86.57 ± 13.4, P < 0.001), VAS pain score (4.69 ± 2.17 to 0.63 ± 1.29, P < 0.001), forward elevation range of motion (144.1° ± 29.9 to 159.69° ± 13.9, P = 0.002), and internal rotation ROM (44.13° ± 12.0 to 52.09° ± 12.0, P = 0.003). The retear rate was 14.28% (6/42). Patients with retears were not older (P = 0.526) but had a larger preoperative tear size (3.25 cm ± 0.5 vs. 2.05 cm ± 0.48, P < 0.001). Preoperative tear size was significantly associated with a postoperative retear (P < 0.001). The duration of preoperative symptoms was significantly associated with pain (P = 0.029), pain improvement (P = 0.013), internal rotation ROM (P = 0.002), and internal rotation strength (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic suture bridge repair provides good clinical results with a low retear rate. The duration of preoperative symptoms was associated with postoperative outcome, indicating that delaying surgery may result in inferior outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case Series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; functional outcomes; repair integrity; retear rate; suture bridge

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26986046     DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1168271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Sportsmed        ISSN: 0091-3847            Impact factor:   2.241


  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison of Modified Suture Bridge Using Rip-Stop versus Traditional Suture Bridge for Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  ZiYing Wu; Chong Zhang; Peng Zhang; TianWu Chen; ShiYi Chen; JiWu Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Separate double-layer repair versus en masse repair for delaminated rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Zhen-Yang Zheng; Yi-Ming Ren
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.