Literature DB >> 2698591

Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomized prospective study.

P Bergsjø1, G D Huang, S Q Yu, Z Z Gao, L S Bakketeig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proper management of pregnancy in uncomplicated cases going beyond 42 weeks.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial of induction of labor at or shortly after the 42-week limit, versus close monitoring without induction except when indicated for medical reasons.
SETTING: Hospital's obstetrical department STUDY POPULATION: 188 pregnant women, randomly allocated to two groups with 94 in each.
INTERVENTIONS: Induction of labor by stripping of membranes and i.v. oxytocin infusion, with artificial rupture of membranes when the cervical opening was 3 cm or more in diameter. The control group was followed with clinical, biochemical and electronic tests, intervention being applied according to needs. END POINTS: Frequency and modes of operative delivery, maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. MAIN
RESULTS: The distribution of gestational age (in weeks) at birth was almost identical in the two groups, but there were more operative deliveries in the control group than in the induction group (64 versus 48, p less than 0.05). Maternal complications and perinatal morbidity rates were equally distributed between the groups. There was one perinatal death in the induction group and two deaths among the controls.
CONCLUSION: With due reservation for small numbers, routine induction after term may result in fewer operative deliveries. No other advantage has been demonstrated when compared with close monitoring and intervention when medically indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2698591     DOI: 10.3109/00016348909006139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  11 in total

Review 1.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 2.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  M Boulvain; C Stan; O Irion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

Review 3.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 4.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Mishanina; Ewelina Rogozinska; Tej Thatthi; Rehan Uddin-Khan; Khalid S Khan; Catherine Meads
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Is routine induction of labour at term ever justified?

Authors:  L Cardozo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-27

6.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 7.  Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arwa Abbas Hussain; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Aamer Imdad; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  Elaine M Finucane; Deirdre J Murphy; Linda M Biesty; Gillian Ml Gyte; Amanda M Cotter; Ethel M Ryan; Michel Boulvain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 9.  Postterm pregnancy.

Authors:  M Galal; I Symonds; H Murray; F Petraglia; R Smith
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.