Early changes in body weight and blood pressure are associated with mortality in incident dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: While much research is devoted to identifying novel biomarkers, addressing the prognostic value of routinely measured clinical parameters is of great interest. We studied early blood pressure (BP) and body weight (BW) trajectories in incident haemodialysis patients and their association with all-cause mortality.
METHODS: In a cohort of 357 incident patients, we obtained all records of BP and BW during the first 90 days on dialysis (over 12 800 observations) and analysed trajectories using penalized B-splines and mixed linear regression models. Baseline comorbidities and all-cause mortality (median follow-up: 2.2 years) were obtained from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry, and the association with mortality was assessed by Cox models adjusting for baseline comorbidities.
RESULTS: During the initial 90 days on dialysis, there were non-linear decreases in BP and BW, with milder slopes after 15 days [systolic BP (SBP)] or 30 days [diastolic BP (DBP) and BW]. SBP or DBP levels at dialysis initiation and changes in BW occurring in the first month or during the following 2 months were significantly associated with survival. In multivariate models adjusting for baseline comorbidities and prescriptions, higher SBP value and BW slopes were independently associated with a lower risk of mortality. Hazard ratios of mortality and 95% confidence intervals were 0.92 (0.85-0.99) for a 10 mmHg higher SBP and 0.76 (0.66-0.88) for a 1 kg/month higher BW change on Days 30-90.
CONCLUSIONS: BW loss in the first weeks on dialysis is a strong and independent predictor of mortality. Low BP is also associated with mortality and is probably the consequence of underlying cardiovascular diseases. These early markers appear to be valuable prognostic factors.

Introduction

Patients who are treated chronic dialysis have a very high risk of mortality, reaching 50% after 5 years on dialysis [1, 2]. Cardiovascular diseases are a major concern since they are responsible for up to 40% of deaths in this population [1, 2]. Elevated blood pressure (BP) and being overweight are known cardiovascular risk factors in the general population, but their effect in haemodialysis patients seems to be more ambiguous [3]. An apparent U-shaped association between BP and mortality and a reversed association between body weight (BW) and mortality have been observed in prevalent haemodialysis patients [4, 5]. Despite scarce evidence, these results have been reproduced in patients incident to dialysis [6, 7]. Incident patients face important changes at the moment of dialysis initiation. Removal of excess water, gain in appetite, recovery of heart function and improved haemodynamic status are likely to affect BP or BW as well as survival [5, 8]. In this context, knowing not only the baseline level of a given biomarker but also how it changes over time could be of very great interest [9, 10]. However, the early changes in BW and BP following dialysis initiation and their association with survival have not been clearly described.

In the present study, we described the longitudinal changes in BP and BW occurring within the 3 months following dialysis initiation. We tested their association with survival observed after up to 8 years of follow-up. We found that low BP and declining BW did relate to mortality. With this approach, we showed that early clinical parameters can be of value to assess prognosis in incident dialysis patients.

Materials and methods

Patients

The study cohort consisted of adult patients who were incident to dialysis between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2010, who were followed up until 31 December 2011 (maximum 8 years). To be included, patients had to be dialysed in one of the participating institutions (Néphrologie Dialyse Saint Guilhem, Sète, France; NephroCare, Castelnau-Le-Lez, France) in the first 31 days on dialysis and to survive the first 90 days on dialysis. Additional inclusion criteria were the presence of at least three observations of weight and BP records in the first 90 days on dialysis. From the initial 421 patients, the final cohort consisted of 357 patients of which 322 had been seen in the first 15 days on dialysis (Supplementary data, Figure S1). This historic cohort study was approved by the ‘Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés’ (CNIL no. EGY/FLR/AR129203) and the ‘Comité consultatif sur le traitement de l'information en matière de recherche’ (CCTIRS no. 12.572).

Data collection and description

Before every dialysis session, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were measured in a lying position by automatic sphygmomanometers, and BW was measured using controlled scales. For each session, dialysis data (prescribed blood flow, dialysate flow, infusion rate and dialyser) and clinical data (SBP, DBP and BW) were longitudinally recorded in the electronic medical records Hemadialyse (Hemasystem, Aix En Provence, France), Clinidial (SyComCare, Mauguio, France) or EuCliD (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). SBP, DBP and BW recorded during the first 90 days on dialysis were extracted and apparent outliers were discarded (<2% of observations). Pre-dialysis levels of serum albumin and C reactive protein (CRP) were routinely determined by hospital laboratories and recorded in electronic medical records. Individual mean albumin level and median CRP level for the first 3 months on dialysis were considered as exposure. Electronically recorded drug prescriptions were analysed to identify patients who started antihypertensive therapies before or during the first 3 months on dialysis. The list of antihypertensive drugs was obtained from the Vidal database [11], and is summarized in Supplementary data, Table S1. Comorbidities at baseline were obtained from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry in which all patients surviving 90 days on chronic dialysis are included [12]. The dates of censoring events (renal transplantation, transfer out of the region, peritoneal dialysis and renal recovery) and outcome (death and dialysis refusal) occurring during follow-up were obtained from the REIN registry. When dialysis was stopped due to dialysis refusal, date of death was obtained by other sources or was considered to have occurred 14 days later.

Model fitting and statistical analyses

The change of BP and BW over time was graphically described using penalized B-splines of the third degree allowing 8 knots located every 10 days, from Day 10 to 80. Secondly, mixed-effects linear models were used to describe the effect of time and to model individual changes [13]. Time and intercept were included in the model as both fixed and random effects. The effect of time was allowed to change after some days by adding a delayed time effect, as both a random and a fixed effect. To account for autocorrelation related to the longitudinal design, the error matrix was defined as autoregressive of the first order. The approach is analogous to modelling patient-specific linear regressions with a possible change of slope. BW was normalized by square root transformation and the presented results are back-transformed [14].

The association of BP and BW intercepts and slopes with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, gender and study centre, as well as vascular access, emergency start, diabetes, active malignancy, chronic respiratory disease, coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction and the use of antihypertensive therapies (Model 1), and with the further addition of hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, dysrhythmia and congestive heart failure (Model 2). Proportionality was assessed by analysis of Schoenfeld and deviance residues and by including variable × time products in the model. We estimated the association between SBP, BW and mortality within each subgroup independently and then tested the presence of an interaction across subgroups. In the sensitivity analysis, we reproduced analyses with relative BW change (per cent change from BW intercept or estimate at Day 30) because the extent of BW changes is likely to be associated with initial BW. We also reproduced analyses with body mass index [BMI (kg/m2) = BW/height2] in patients in whom height was recorded.

Data were summarized as mean and standard error of the mean and median and interquartile range (IQR). Comparisons between groups were performed by two-sample t-test, paired t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test according to data distribution. All P-values are two sided and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS v.9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Included population

There were 357 patients who met all the inclusion criteria (Supplementary data, Figure S1). Their baseline characteristics are given in Table 1. Patients were relatively old and were more frequently males (around two-thirds of the study population) than females. The most frequent initial renal disease was glomerulonephritis. Comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes were very frequent. Cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarctions and active malignancies were present in ∼10% of patients. The first dialysis was performed in an emergency in 30% of patients and catheter was the initial vascular access in 37% of patients. Most patients (96%) were treated with haemodialysis and 4% with haemodiafiltration. Over the first 3 months, most patients (92%) received three to four weekly dialysis sessions. Sessions lasted a median of 4 h (IQR: 3.0–4.0 h). Blood flow was set between 180 and 400 mL/min [median and IQR: 300 (250–300) mL/min]. Dialysis was performed with high flux (56%) or low flux dialysers (44%).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients depending on survival

Characteristics	All patients (n = 357)	Patients who survived (n = 193)	Patients who died (n = 164)	P-value
Age (year)	74.9 (65.0–81.7)	72.6 (60.0–79.3)	77.8 (72.0–83.0)	<0.001
Gender (% female)	36.7	38.3	34.8	0.5
Observed pre-dialysis values
SBP (mmHg)	150.8 ± 1.7	155.3 ± 2.2	145.6 ± 2.5	0.004
DBP (mmHg)	71.0 ± 0.9	73.5 ± 1.2	68.1 ± 1.3	0.003
BW (kg)	71.1 (61.8–82.2)	71.1 (61.8–82.1)	71.2 (61.8–82.2)	0.9
BMI (kg/m2)	27.0 ± 0.4	27.4 ± 0.5	26.5 ± 0.6	0.3
Initial renal disease (%)				0.004
Glomerulonephritis	19.1	23.3	14.0
Diabetic nephropathy	13.5	8.3	19.5
Other	67.4	68.4	66.5
Blood laboratory values
Albumin (g/L)	34.8 ± 0.7	34.7 ± 0.9	35.0 ± 1.1	0.8
CRP (mg/L)	7.0 (3.0–18.5)	7.8 (2.7–15.9)	7.0 (3.0–22.7)	0.6
Comorbidities (%)
Hypertension	87.0	90.9	82.6	0.02
Diabetes	39.7	40.6	38.5	0.7
Coronary disease	37.4	31.0	44.7	0.008
Peripheral vascular disease	33.9	26.2	42.9	0.001
Dysrhythmia	26.2	17.7	36.0	<0.001
Congestive heart failure	21.3	16.0	27.3	0.01
Chronic respiratory disease	16.4	11.8	21.7	0.01
Active malignancy	11.8	10.7	13.0	0.5
Myocardial infarction	9.8	8.6	11.2	0.4
Cerebrovascular disease	8.9	9.1	8.7	0.9
Smoking (%)				0.2
Current	6.0	4.3	8.1
Former	24.1	22.5	26.1
Non-smoker	69.8	73.3	65.8
Antihypertensive therapies (%)	25.5	27.1	23.6	0.4
First dialysis in emergency (%)	29.9	25.1	35.6	0.03
Vascular access (%)				<0.001
Catheter	37.3	34.7	40.2
Arteriovenous fistula	40.9	52.9	26.8
Other	21.9	12.4	32.9

Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) or median (IQR). P-values are for the comparison between patients who survived and patients who died.

The first observations available within the first week on dialysis were considered baseline values. The sample size was 294 for SBP, DBP and BW, 90 for albumin and 63 for CRP. Prescription of antihypertensive therapies within the first 3 months was considered.

CRP, C reactive protein.

The median follow-up was 2.2 years (IQR: 1.3–3.8 years), at which time the survival rate was 68%. At the end of the observation period, 164 (46%) patients had presented the outcome (158 deaths and 6 dialysis cessations). For other patients, censoring was due to study ending (n = 158), renal transplantation (n = 25), switch to peritoneal dialysis (n = 1), renal function recovery (n = 6) and loss to follow-up (n = 3). Patients who presented the outcome were more likely to have coronary insufficiency, congestive heart failure and peripheral vascular disease (Table 1). In contrast, they were less frequently diagnosed with hypertension and had lower BP (P < 0.01) and similar BW (Table 1).

Changes in BP and BW

We studied BP and BW levels during the first 90 days on dialysis. For SBP, DBP or BW, the mean number of observations per patient was 36 [median and IQR: 38 (34–40)], leading to a total number of observations exceeding 12 800. Overall, 95% of patients had 22 or more observations of SBP, DBP and BW; only two patients had four or fewer observations. Graphical analysis showed that mean SBP, DBP and BW decreased over the first 3 months, with a steeper initial phase (Figure 1). BW was globally stabilized after the first month. Results from mixed modelling were consistent with observations (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

General trajectory of SBP, DBP and BW over the first 3 months on dialysis. Regression lines and 95% confidence intervals were obtained with penalized B-splines, using data from all patients together.

Table 2.

Parameters describing the trajectories of SBP, DBP and BW over the first 3 months on dialysis

Mixed linear model parameters	Mean ± SEM	Median (IQR)
SBP before dialysis
Intercept (mmHg)	148.5 ± 1.1	147.8 (136.3; 161.6)
Slope 0–15 (mmHg/month)	−12.0 ± 1.3	−10.5 (−22.8; −1.0)
Slope 15–90 (mmHg/month)	−1.2 ± 0.4	−0.7 (−5.5; 3.0)
DBP before dialysis
Intercept (mmHg)	69.4 ± 0.6	68.5 (61.1; 77.3)
Slope 0–30 (mmHg/month)	−1.5 ± 0.3	−1.2 (−4.8; 2.4)
Slope 30–90 (mmHg/month)	−0.7 ± 0.2	−0.6 (−2.5; 1.1)
BW before dialysis
Intercept (kg)	70.5 ± 0.9	70.1 (60.7; 79.6)
Slope 0–30 (kg/month)	−1.4 ± 0.2	−0.8 (−2.8; 0.4)
Slope 30–90 (kg/month)	0.07 ± 0.05	0.1 (−0.3; 0.6)

All means and medians are significantly different from 0 with the exception of mean BW slope 30–90.

The level of BW was influenced by having diabetes (7.1 ± 1.8 kg, P < 0.001), chronic respiratory disease (5.5 ± 2.4 kg, P = 0.02) or hypertension (5.7 ± 2.6 kg, P = 0.03), receiving antihypertensive therapies (−4.3 ± 1.9 kg, P = 0.03) and by albumin levels (0.4 ± 0.2 kg for each 1 g/L, P = 0.02). BP was lower in patients with dysrhythmia (SBP, −7.0 ± 3.3 mmHg, P = 0.03; DBP, −6.1 ± 1.6 mmHg, P < 0.001) or congestive heart failure (SBP, −15.2 ± 3.5 mmHg; DBP, −8.2 ± 1.7 mmHg; both P < 0.001). The level of SBP was higher in diabetic patients (9.1 ± 3.0 mmHg, P = 0.002) and lower in those starting dialysis in an emergency (−9.9 ± 3.2 mmHg, P = 0.002). The level of DBP was lower in patients with coronary disease (−5.4 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.002), chronic respiratory disease (−4.3 ± 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.02) and peripheral vascular disease (−3.6 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.02).

Association of BP and BW with mortality

The Kaplan–Meier survival curves for patients grouped by SBP and BW slope are presented in Figure 2. Patients with higher SBP intercepts had a significantly lower risk of mortality (Figure 2). The risk of mortality was also affected by BW slopes: patients with weight reduction were at higher risk of mortality, while patients with increasing BW were at lower risk (Figure 2). Having both a high SBP value and a BW increase was associated with the best survival rate (Figure 2). For a comparable amount of change of 1 SD, effect sizes were similar for SBP and DBP intercept on the one hand, and for the two BW slopes on the other (Supplementary data, Table S2). Compared with BP intercepts, the effects of BW slopes on survival were of greater magnitude.

Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves by subgroups. Survival rates were estimated for subgroups of estimated baseline SBP (SBP intercept) and BW change on Days 30–90 (BW slope 30–90) with no adjustment for comorbidities. P-value for the log-rank test is displayed.

Survival analyses accounting for the effect of age, gender and other baseline characteristics showed that having a 10 mmHg higher SBP reduced the risk of mortality by 8% (P = 0.04, Table 3, Model 1) and having a 1 kg/month higher BW slope (less negative or more positive) reduced the risk of mortality by 24% (P < 0.001, Table 3, Model 1). Active malignancy, chronic respiratory disease and the use of catheter as vascular access were associated with an increased risk of mortality, respectively, of 1.75-, 1.9- and 2.6-fold (P ≤ 0.02, Table 3, Model 1).

Table 3.

Hazard ratios of mortality from multivariate Cox models

Covariates	Model 1		Model 2
	HR (95% CI)	P-value	HR (95% CI)	P-value
SBP intercept (for each 10 mmHg increase)	0.92 (0.85; 0.99)	0.04	0.95 (0.88; 1.03)	0.2
BW slope 30–90 (for each 1 kg/month increase)	0.76 (0.66; 0.88)	<0.001	0.78 (0.67; 0.91)	<0.001
Antihypertensive therapies (yes)	0.96 (0.45; 2.07)	0.9	0.87 (0.40; 1.89)	0.7
Emergency start (yes)	1.01 (0.68; 1.49)	0.9	0.86 (0.58; 1.29)	0.5
Fistula (versus catheter)	0.38 (0.24; 0.59)	<0.001	0.35 (0.22; 0.55)	<0.001
Diabetes (yes)	0.93 (0.65; 1.33)	0.7	0.90 (0.62; 1.30)	0.6
Active malignancy (yes)	1.75 (1.08; 2.85)	0.02	1.88 (1.16; 3.06)	0.01
Chronic respiratory disease (yes)	1.92 (1.27; 2.90)	0.002	1.77 (1.16; 2.71)	0.01
Coronary disease (yes)	1.32 (0.93; 1.89)	0.1	1.12 (0.77; 1.63)	0.6
Cerebrovascular disease (yes)	1.23 (0.69; 2.18)	0.5	1.02 (0.57; 1.82)	0.9
Myocardial infarction (yes)	0.83 (0.48; 1.43)	0.5	0.78 (0.44; 1.38)	0.4
Peripheral vascular disease (yes)	–	–	1.76 (1.23; 2.51)	0.002
Dysrhythmia (yes)	–	–	1.95 (1.34; 2.84)	<0.001
Hypertension (yes)	–	–	0.70 (0.45; 1.09)	0.1
Congestive heart failure (yes)	–	–	1.00 (0.65; 1.53)	0.9

Models 1 and 2 adjusting for age, gender and study centre. Sample size n = 339. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Using the same adjustment model, the association of SBP value and BW change with mortality was estimated by Cox proportional hazard models in different subgroups and the presence of interactions was tested (Figure 3). The only significant interaction was that of SBP intercept with gender with regards to mortality: high SBP is significantly associated with survival in males, but not in females.

Fig. 3.

Effect on mortality of SBP and BW slope stratified by subgroup. Hazard ratio (HR) of mortality for a 10 mmHg higher SBP (left panel) and a 1 kg/month higher BW slope (right panel) estimated within each subgroup using the adjustment Model 1 (age, gender, venous access, emergency start, diabetes, active malignancy, chronic respiratory disease, coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease and myocardial infarction). Arrows represent confidence intervals (CI) larger than depicted on the graph. P-values for interactions are displayed.

With the inclusion of additional cardiovascular comorbidities as covariates (Table 3, Model 2), BW changes remained significantly associated with survival (22% risk reduction for 1 kg/month higher BW slopes) while the effect of baseline SBP was no longer significant. In this model, peripheral vascular disease and dysrhythmia were both found to be significantly associated with increased risk of mortality, which almost doubled. These results suggest that decreasing BW is predictive of adverse outcome, the risk of which is further increased in the case of low BP, heart failure or arteritis.

Sensitivity analyses

The addition of blood albumin and CRP levels in the adjustment models drastically limited the population size (89 patients, Supplementary data,Table S3). The effects of SBP intercept and BW change were no longer significant, while chronic respiratory disease and dysrhythmia were confirmed as important risk factors. Survival analyses were reproduced when including any pairing of BP intercept and BW slope in the two multivariate models (Supplementary data, Table S4.A). In all cases, initial BP was significantly associated with outcome in the first adjustment model, while BW slopes were strongly associated with better survival in all models (P < 0.001). The results were very similar when BW was analysed as per cent change from baseline (Supplementary data, Table S4.B). We analysed the trajectory of BMI in a subcohort of 241 patients with recorded height. In most models, both higher baseline BP and BMI change were associated with survival, even with the fully adjusted model (Supplementary data, Table S4.C). Finally, we tested the association between mortality and the level of SBP, DBP and BW estimated on Days 15, 30 and 90 and found that as time passes, the link between BP level and mortality weakens (Supplementary data, Table S5).

Discussion

BP and BW are clinical parameters of primary importance in renal patients. As chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses and glomerular filtration rate decreases, sodium balance becomes positive and extracellular volume overload generally appears. This process induces weight gain and almost necessarily a rise in BP. The initiation of dialysis rapidly corrects this situation: BW and BP are significantly reduced in only a few weeks, as shown using penalized B-splines (Figure 1), which estimate BP and BW levels at each time point based on all observations, with no assertion on the global shape of trajectories [15]. Following the initial decrease, BP continues to decrease over the first 3 months on dialysis, while BW starts to slightly increase. The BW trajectory is likely due to removal of excess water, which in turn has a BP lowering action. The persistence of BP decrease could be attributed to other dialysis effects such as removal of uraemic toxins. Observations lasting up to 1 year after dialysis initiation confirmed that BW slightly increased, which could be related to improved nutrition, while reported BP changes were inconsistent [16-19].

Dialysis helps to restore the altered cardiovascular state of CKD patients, notably by removing extracellular volume excess. However, not all patients display a beneficial haemodynamic response to the treatment. We hypothesized that individual responses to therapy were associated with long-term prognosis and found that higher BP level and change in BW (less BW reduction or higher BW increase) were associated with survival, adjusting for other comorbidities. The protective effect of lower BP was consistent in patients without concomitant diseases and less clear in those with other diseases. Interestingly, the effect seemed reversed, although non-significant, in those with SBP exceeding 157 mmHg, supporting a U-shaped association between BP and mortality. This association has been described previously [4, 20, 21], and it was criticized as being biased towards early deaths [22]. We found similar results when avoiding survival bias and early deaths by selecting incident patients surviving the first 3 months of dialysis. Interestingly, the link between BP level and mortality was clear in the first weeks on dialysis only, which suggests that once elevated BP has been corrected by dialysis, it may not be as powerful for predicting survival. We did not find a link between BP changes and mortality, although larger studies have reported that increasing or stable BP was associated with better survival [7, 16, 23].

Our study showed that a decrease in BW occurring in the first months on dialysis was associated with mortality. We report that the association was consistent across subgroups, including patients starting dialysis in an emergency, therefore expanding previous knowledge [17]. Reproducing analyses with relative BW change and change in BMI, we observed the same protective effects of increasing BW. Different studies in prevalent patients have shown that declining BMI was associated with increased mortality [5, 24, 25]. In patients incident to dialysis, a marked BW loss in the weeks before dialysis initiation or during the first year on dialysis was also associated with mortality [17, 26]. In general, BW loss is the result of decreased food intake (anorexia, malnutrition and depression) and/or increased energetic expenditure (protein-energy wasting, inflammation and catabolic stress). In dialysis patients, additional factors exist, most importantly removal of excess water and catabolic stress induced by dialysis procedures. Interestingly, a study on muscle and fat mass indicators showed that lower values of either compartment were associated with increased mortality [27]. However, a recent study showed that the protective effect of BMI on survival almost exclusively occurred in patients with inflammation [28]. These two results together suggest that patients at high risk of wasting are those who would benefit the most from dietary interventions. Further studies should be performed to address specifically this question.

We found that different comorbid diseases significantly influenced mortality, which shows that the cohort was well adapted to the aims of the study. In particular, the risk of death was almost doubled in patients starting dialysis with dysrhythmia, active malignancy or peripheral vascular disease. In a study based on the REIN registry, these pathologies, as well as diabetes and low BMI, have been reported to predict 6-month mortality in elderly patients starting on dialysis [29]. In our study, chronic respiratory disease was also found to be associated with outcome. We further studied the influence of emergency dialysis start and of dialysis access, assessed generally at 3 months, to evaluate the influence of the dialysis initiation context on mortality. We found that patients being dialysed on catheter were at higher risk of all-cause mortality, confirming the importance of preparing for the terminal state with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula [30, 31]. In France, while almost 80% of patients are dialysed on arteriovenous fistula, more than half of patients started dialysis on catheter [1]. Furthermore, there has been an increase in catheter use over the past years that was observed in France as well as in other European countries [1, 32].

We used linear mixed models to estimate individual and population longitudinal changes, since this approach has the advantage of allowing simultaneously modelling of intra- and interindividual change over time [33]. Linear mixed models account for correlations between repeated measures from the same patient and they can handle between-patient differences in time intervals and in number of observations. These models provide summary measures of change (intercepts and slopes) for each patient, which were associated with mortality in a second step, using the appropriate time-to-event approaches, similar to the recently reported analysis of intradialytic BP changes [34]. Although indirect, this approach prevents the loss of information that would occur if we simply modelled different trends of change for patients who presented the outcome or not.

Still, our study has some limitations, the major one being that it is observational, and therefore, we can neither exclude the presence of unmeasured confounding factors, conclude on any causal relationship nor confirm the efficacy of possible interventions. Furthermore, the ‘sample size’ did not allow us to see the link between baseline BMI and mortality, which has been well established in larger studies [6, 25]. We studied BP measured before dialysis and pre-dialysis weight, with no additional information on body composition. Although it would have been very interesting to have precise information the level of muscle mass, fat mass and fluid retention, and to have a more representative measure of the BP burden such as ambulatory BP, the variables that we analysed are available to most clinicians, and our results are applicable to everyday practice. We were interested in the period directly following dialysis initiation and arbitrarily chose to limit our analysis to a 3-month period. This choice is arguable but was made to maintain a balance between sufficient time to observe a change and the number of patients at risk at the end of this observation period.

In conclusion, in a time when much research is devoted to identifying biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis or to precisely evaluating prognosis, the identification of the prognostic value of clinical parameters that are routinely measured and recorded is of great interest. We found that studying the changes of clinical parameters over the first 3 months on dialysis enabled us to identify patients at higher risk of mortality. These are the patients with low BP (SBP or DBP), and those with severe early weight loss or weight loss that is maintained past the first month. Our results suggest that in patients new to dialysis, apparently normal or low levels of BP and weight loss may be associated with higher risk of mortality. We believe that clinicians should pay great attention to BP level in patients reaching the final stage of CKD, perhaps even more if it is in the ‘normal range’. Once dialysis therapy has started, a maintained decrease in BW without a clear haemodynamic improvement (persistent orthopnoea or dyspnoea with low BP) should be seen as an alert; the underlying reasons should be sought and therapy adapted to improve haemodynamic state with measures such as longer dialysis treatments, lower ultrafiltration rates and introducing convective therapies, among others.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available here.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format. Parts of this manuscript have been presented at the European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Congress in London 2015.

Click here for additional data file.