| Literature DB >> 26985344 |
Gholamreza Najafi1, Farah Farokhi2, Ali Shalizar Jalali1, Zahra Akbarizadeh2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effects of cyclosporine (Cs), a fungal cyclic polypeptide with potent immunosuppressive activity, on fertility have assumed greater significance with the increasing numbers of transplantations being performed all over the world. Current study was undertaken to investigate the potential of Satureja khuzestanica Essential Oil (SEO) as an antioxidant to mitigate Cs-induced reprotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Cyclosporine; In Vitro Fertilization; Satureja khuzestanica; Sperm
Year: 2015 PMID: 26985344 PMCID: PMC4793177 DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
Fig.1Photomicrographs of epididymal sperms in cyclosporinetreated rats. Epididymal sperms stained with eosin-Y: dead sperms appear pink and live sperm is not stained (×2000), B. Acridine orange stain to native DNA fluoresces green; whereas denatured DNA fluoresces orange-red (×2000) and C. Epididymal sperms stained with aniline blue: immature sperm head is blue; mature is unstained (×2000).
Effect of Cs and SEO on relative weights of testes and epididymides and epididymal sperm parameters (n=8)
| Control | Cs | SEO | Cs+SEO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testes (weight/BW %) | 0.89 ± 0.005 | 0.82 ± 0.003a | 0.89 ± 0.006b | 0.86 ± 0.003a, b |
| Epididymides (weight/BW %) | 0.52 ± 0.005 | 0.45 ± 0.008a | 0.53 ± 0.003b | 0.49 ± 0.003a, b |
| Sperm count (106/ml) | 50.50 ± 1.44 | 19.50 ± 0.86a | 49.33 ± 1.45b | 46.00 ± 1.15b |
| Sperm viability (%) | 87.00 ± 1.73 | 68.00 ± 1.73a | 86.33 ± 1.20b | 79.50 ± 0.86a, b |
| Sperm motility (%) | 79.33 ± 0.88 | 56.66 ± 0.88a | 80.00 ± 1.73b | 64.50 ± 0.86a, b |
| AO-positive sperms (%) | 6.50 ± 0.86 | 28.00 ± 1.73a | 5.83 ± 0.60b | 10.50 ± 1.44b |
| AB-positive sperms (%) | 8.00 ± 0.57 | 19.50 ± 0.86a | 9.16 ± 0.44b | 11.00 ± 2.30b |
BW; Body weight, Cs; Cyclosporine, SEO; Satureja khuzestanica essential oil, AO; Acridine orange, AB; Aniline blue, a; Statistically significant as compared with the control group at P<0.05 and b; Statistically significant as compared with the Cs group at P<0.05. The values are expressed as mean ± SEM.