Literature DB >> 26985215

Other Probable Explanations for Acute Neurological Deficits after the Removal of a Central Venous Catheter.

Ali Hosseinsabet1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26985215      PMCID: PMC4791655     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent        ISSN: 1735-5370


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear editor, I read the article written by Ahmadi et al.[1] published in the previous issue of your journal. In this invaluable article, the authors meticulously explained their observations on patients with acute neurological deficits after the removal of central venous catheters. However, there are some obscure points that should be pondered. Firstly, brain magnetic resonance imaging or repeated computed tomography scan for a better delineation of these neurological events was not done for most patients. Secondly, the patients should have undergone transesophageal study with contrast for the assessment of the possibility of the existence of the patent foramen ovale. Thirdly, the authors failed to consider the possibility of the entrance of the venous catheter into the left atrium.[2]-[4] Central venous catheters may enter the left atrium accidentally in these patients, causing thrombosis. Also, the removal of catheters may result in embolization. Nonetheless, these two possibilities were ignored in this study. Another possibility discounted by the authors is the occurrence of paradoxical embolization through the pulmonary vasculature in the presence of a pulmonary arteriovenous fistula.[5] The authors did not mention the time period during which these observations were collected, but it seems that these events were rare given the high number of surgical procedures performed in that center. Finally — in the explanation of their observations — the authors say, “Although only 4 patients in this study had evidence of intracardiac defects….”; however, elsewhere in the text the authors mention that bubble passage from the interatrial septum occurred only in 2 patients and that in 4 patients this study was not done or was negative. What should be taken into account in the explanation of these observations is the probability of pulmonary arteriovenous fistulae and accidental entrance of the central venous catheter into the left atrium.
  5 in total

1.  Paradoxical brain embolism in a young man with isolated pulmonary arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomelleri; Paolo Bovi; Monica Carletti; Sara Mazzucco; Elena Bazzoli; Francesco Casilli; Eustaquio Onorato; Giuseppe Moretto
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Trans-septal left atrial catheterisation.

Authors:  T Fukutome; M Kohjiro; A Sese; Y Ueno
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Benefit of using a triple-lumen catheter to monitor left atrial pressure.

Authors:  H Ceyran; Y Akçalý; F Asgun; T Tezcaner; K Tasdemir; O N Emirogullarý; M Ersepciler
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Percutaneous trans-jugular technique for continuous perioperative monitoring of intra-cardiac and pulmonary artery pressures during cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Syed Aqeel Hussain; Shahab Naqvi; Iftikhar Ahmed; Umair Younis; Kamal Saleem; Syed Muzaffar Hasan
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.781

5.  Central venous line and acute neurological deficit: a case series.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Ahmadi; Mahmood Shirzad; Sam Zeraatian; Abbas Salehiomran; Seyed Hesameddin Abbasi; Atefeh Ghiasi
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2014-07-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.