Literature DB >> 26984989

Multicentre analysis of current strategies and outcomes in open aortic arch surgery: heterogeneity is still an issue.

Paul P Urbanski1, Maximilian Luehr2, Roberto Di Bartolomeo3, Anno Diegeler4, Ruggero De Paulis5, Giampiero Esposito6, Robert S Bonser7, Christian D Etz8, Klaus Kallenbach9, Bartosz Rylski10, Malakh Lal Shrestha11, Konstantinos Tsagakis12, Michael Zacher4, Andreas Zierer13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to evaluate, on the basis of a multicentre analysis, current results of elective open aortic arch surgery performed during the last decade.
METHODS: Data of 1232 consecutive patients who underwent aortic arch repair with reimplantation of at least one supra-aortic artery between 2004 and 2013 were collected from 11 European cardiovascular centres, and retrospective statistical examination was performed using uni- and multi-variable analyses to identify predictors for 30-day mortality. Acute aortic dissections and arch surgeries not involving the supra-aortic arteries were not included.
RESULTS: Arch repair involving all 3 arch arteries (total), 2 arch arteries (subtotal) or 1 arch artery (partial) was performed in 956 (77.6%), 155 (12.6%) and 121 (9.8%) patients, respectively. The patients' characteristics as well as the surgical techniques, including the method of cannulation, perfusion and protection, varied considerably between the clinics participating in the study. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 11.4 and 8.8% for the entire cohort, respectively, ranging between 1.7 and 19.0% in the surgical centres. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified surgical centre, patient's age, number of previous surgeries with sternotomy and concomitant surgeries as independent risk factors of 30-day mortality. The follow-up of the study group was 96.5% complete with an overall follow-up duration of 3.3 ± 2.9 years, resulting in 4020 patient-years. After hospital discharge, 176 (14.3%) patients died, yielding an overall mortality rate of 25.6%. The actuarial survival after 5 and 8 years was 72.0 ± 1.5% and 64.0 ± 2.0, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical risk in elective aortic arch surgery has remained high during the last decade despite the advance in surgical techniques. However, the patients' characteristics, numbers of surgeries, the techniques and the results varied considerably among the centres. The incompleteness of data gathered retrospectively was not effective enough to determine advantages of particular cannulation, perfusion, protection or surgical techniques; and therefore, we strongly recommend further prospective multicentre studies, preferably registries, in which all relevant data have to be clearly defined and collected.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic arch; Aortic surgery; Cerebral protection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984989     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  Con-debate: short circulatory arrest times in arch reconstructive surgery: is simple retrograde cerebral perfusion or hypothermic circulatory arrest as good or better than complex antegrade cerebral perfusion for open distal involvement or hemi-arch?

Authors:  Luca Di Marco; Giacomo Murana; Alessandro Leone; Davide Pacini
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-08

2.  Results of frozen elephant trunk from the international E-vita Open registry.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsagakis; Davide Pacini; Martin Grabenwöger; Michael A Borger; Nora Goebel; Wolfgang Hemmer; Alvaro Laranjeira Santos; Thanos Sioris; Kazimierz Widenka; Petar Risteski; Jorge Mascaro; Igor Rudez; Andreas Zierer; Carlos A Mestres; Arjang Ruhparwar; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Heinz Jakob
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05

3.  A new tool in the surgeon's hand-initial experience with a new stent for type A dissection involving the aortic arch.

Authors:  Thorsten Wahlers; Maximilian Luehr
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

4.  Endovascular treatment of the dissected proximal aortic arch: a systematic review.

Authors:  Changtian Wang; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Denis Berdajs; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-29

5.  Outcomes of different aortic arch replacement techniques.

Authors:  Djamila Abjigitova; Mostafa M Mokhles; Grigorios Papageorgiou; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.620

6.  Efficacy of cardiovascular surgery for Marfan syndrome patients: a single-center 15-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Boyao Zhang; Qing Xue; Yangfeng Tang; Shangyi Yu; Xingli Fan; Zhiyun Xu; Lin Han
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  A single-center experience in the use of hybrid techniques for thoracic aortic pathology.

Authors:  Igor Oleksandrovych Ditkivskyy; Vitaly Ivanovich Kravchenko; Oleksandra Oleksandrivna Lohvinenko; Michael Ivanovich Sheremet
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-02

8.  Endovascular surgery for thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch.

Authors:  Heng Lu; Ling-Chen Huang; Liang-Wan Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-14

9.  Cerebral protection in aortic arch surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Djamila Abjigitova; Kevin M Veen; Gabriëlle van Tussenbroek; Mostafa M Mokhles; Jos A Bekkers; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.