BACKGROUND: Psychological resilience is associated with an improved capacity to cope with chronic health challenges such as cardiovascular disease. AIMS: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the relationship between psychological resilience and symptoms of depression in a non-acute cardiac outpatient population. METHODS: A total of 419 adult cardiac outpatients (288 men; mean±SD age 66.26±14.04 years) attending cardiovascular clinics completed the Sense of Coherence (SOC13) scale as a measure of psychological resilience and the Cardiac Depression Scale (CDS26) prior to their consultation. RESULTS: The total SOC13 score (mean±SD 64.02±14.24, range 19-91) was within the moderate range. Older patients (⩾65 years) were significantly more resilient than those aged <65 ( p<0.01). Psychological resilience (SOC13) was negatively correlated with depression (CDS26) ( r=-0.79; p<0.001) and inversely associated with affective, cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. Psychological resilience, particularly meaningfulness, accounted for more of the variance in affective features of depression than for somatic features. CONCLUSION: These findings show that low psychological resilience was related to depression in this cohort of cardiac outpatients, particularly affective symptoms such as anhedonia and hopelessness. The SOC13 scale offers a complementary measure of psychological status that could be used to monitor, and possibly predict, patient coping and response to treatment throughout the cardiovascular disease trajectory.
BACKGROUND: Psychological resilience is associated with an improved capacity to cope with chronic health challenges such as cardiovascular disease. AIMS: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the relationship between psychological resilience and symptoms of depression in a non-acute cardiac outpatient population. METHODS: A total of 419 adult cardiac outpatients (288 men; mean±SD age 66.26±14.04 years) attending cardiovascular clinics completed the Sense of Coherence (SOC13) scale as a measure of psychological resilience and the Cardiac Depression Scale (CDS26) prior to their consultation. RESULTS: The total SOC13 score (mean±SD 64.02±14.24, range 19-91) was within the moderate range. Older patients (⩾65 years) were significantly more resilient than those aged <65 ( p<0.01). Psychological resilience (SOC13) was negatively correlated with depression (CDS26) ( r=-0.79; p<0.001) and inversely associated with affective, cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. Psychological resilience, particularly meaningfulness, accounted for more of the variance in affective features of depression than for somatic features. CONCLUSION: These findings show that low psychological resilience was related to depression in this cohort of cardiac outpatients, particularly affective symptoms such as anhedonia and hopelessness. The SOC13 scale offers a complementary measure of psychological status that could be used to monitor, and possibly predict, patient coping and response to treatment throughout the cardiovascular disease trajectory.
Authors: Dalton Bertolim Précoma; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Antonio Felipe Simão; Oscar Pereira Dutra; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; Rui Manuel Dos Santos Póvoa; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar Filho; Carlos Alberto Machado; Carlos Scherr; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Raul Dias Dos Santos Filho; Tales de Carvalho; Álvaro Avezum; Roberto Esporcatte; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; David de Pádua Brasil; Gabriel Porto Soares; Paolo Blanco Villela; Roberto Muniz Ferreira; Wolney de Andrade Martins; Andrei C Sposito; Bruno Halpern; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Luiz Sergio Fernandes Carvalho; Marcos Antônio Tambascia; Otávio Rizzi Coelho-Filho; Adriana Bertolami; Harry Correa Filho; Hermes Toros Xavier; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Andrea Araújo Brandão; Audes Diógenes de Magalhães Feitosa; Celso Amodeo; Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza; Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa; Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias; Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza; Fernando Augusto Alves da Costa; Ivan Romero Rivera; Lucia Campos Pellanda; Maria Alayde Mendonça da Silva; Aloyzio Cechella Achutti; André Ribeiro Langowiski; Carla Janice Baister Lantieri; Jaqueline Ribeiro Scholz; Silvia Maria Cury Ismael; José Carlos Aidar Ayoub; Luiz César Nazário Scala; Mario Fritsch Neves; Paulo Cesar Brandão Veiga Jardim; Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa Fuchs; Thiago de Souza Veiga Jardim; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Jamil Cherem Schneider; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Sergio Emanuel Kaiser; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Carlos Daniel Magnoni; Marcio Hiroshi Miname; Roberta Soares Lara; Artur Haddad Herdy; Cláudio Gil Soares de Araújo; Mauricio Milani; Miguel Morita Fernandes da Silva; Ricardo Stein; Fernando Antonio Lucchese; Fernando Nobre; Hermilo Borba Griz; Lucélia Batista Neves Cunha Magalhães; Mario Henrique Elesbão de Borba; Mauro Ricardo Nunes Pontes; Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: M Bonaccio; A Di Castelnuovo; S Costanzo; G Pounis; M Persichillo; C Cerletti; M B Donati; G de Gaetano; L Iacoviello Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Ruth-Alma N Turkson-Ocran; Sarah L Szanton; Lisa A Cooper; Sherita H Golden; Rexford S Ahima; Nancy Perrin; Yvonne Commodore-Mensah Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 1.847