Literature DB >> 26984909

Responsiveness-informed multiple imputation and inverse probability-weighting in cohort studies with missing data that are non-monotone or not missing at random.

James C Doidge1.   

Abstract

Population-based cohort studies are invaluable to health research because of the breadth of data collection over time, and the representativeness of their samples. However, they are especially prone to missing data, which can compromise the validity of analyses when data are not missing at random. Having many waves of data collection presents opportunity for participants' responsiveness to be observed over time, which may be informative about missing data mechanisms and thus useful as an auxiliary variable. Modern approaches to handling missing data such as multiple imputation and maximum likelihood can be difficult to implement with the large numbers of auxiliary variables and large amounts of non-monotone missing data that occur in cohort studies. Inverse probability-weighting can be easier to implement but conventional wisdom has stated that it cannot be applied to non-monotone missing data. This paper describes two methods of applying inverse probability-weighting to non-monotone missing data, and explores the potential value of including measures of responsiveness in either inverse probability-weighting or multiple imputation. Simulation studies are used to compare methods and demonstrate that responsiveness in longitudinal studies can be used to mitigate bias induced by missing data, even when data are not missing at random.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Missing data; cohort attrition; cohort studies; inverse probability-weighting; longitudinal studies; loss to follow-up; missing at random; multiple imputation; non-monotone missing data; not missing at random

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984909     DOI: 10.1177/0962280216628902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  6 in total

1.  Measurement error and misclassification in electronic medical records: methods to mitigate bias.

Authors:  Jessica C Young; Mitchell M Conover; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-10

2.  Predictors of Change in Physical Function in Older Adults in Response to Long-Term, Structured Physical Activity: The LIFE Study.

Authors:  Andrew S Layne; Fang-Chi Hsu; Steven N Blair; Shyh-Huei Chen; Jennifer Dungan; Roger A Fielding; Nancy W Glynn; Alexandra M Hajduk; Abby C King; Todd M Manini; Anthony P Marsh; Marco Pahor; Christine A Pellegrini; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Sexual Minority Women in Longitudinal Survey Research: Is Attrition a Problem?

Authors:  Alice Campbell; Francisco Perales; Janeen Baxter
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-04-08

4.  Risks for Mental Illness in Indigenous Australian Children: A Descriptive Study Demonstrating High Levels of Vulnerability.

Authors:  Asterie Twizeyemariya; Sophie Guy; Gareth Furber; Leonie Segal
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer.

Authors:  Rachael A Hughes; Jon Heron; Jonathan A C Sterne; Kate Tilling
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Comparison of statistical approaches for analyzing incomplete longitudinal patient-reported outcome data in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ines Rombach; Crispin Jenkinson; Alastair M Gray; David W Murray; Oliver Rivero-Arias
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2018-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.