Literature DB >> 26984898

Is heart transplantation after circulatory death compatible with the dead donor rule?

Michael Nair-Collins1, Franklin G Miller2.   

Abstract

Dalle Ave et al (2016) provide a valuable overview of several protocols for heart transplantation after circulatory death. However, their analysis of the compatibility of heart donation after circulatory death (DCD) with the dead donor rule (DDR) is flawed. Their permanence-based criteria for death, which depart substantially from established law and bioethics, are ad hoc and unfounded. Furthermore, their analysis is self-defeating, because it undercuts the central motivation for DDR as both a legal and a moral constraint, rendering the DDR vacuous and trivial. Rather than devise new and ad hoc criteria for death for the purpose of rendering DCD nominally consistent with DDR, we contend that the best approach is to explicitly abandon DDR. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dead donor rule; Definition/Determination of Death; Vital organ donation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984898     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  How (not) to think of the 'dead-donor' rule.

Authors:  Adam Omelianchuk
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2018-02

2.  Heart transplantation after the circulatory death; the ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas; Salman Assad
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.