Literature DB >> 26984626

Cuttlefish see shape from shading, fine-tuning coloration in response to pictorial depth cues and directional illumination.

Sarah Zylinski1, D Osorio2, Sonke Johnsen3.   

Abstract

Humans use shading as a cue to three-dimensional form by combining low-level information about light intensity with high-level knowledge about objects and the environment. Here, we examine how cuttlefish Sepia officinalis respond to light and shadow to shade the white square (WS) feature in their body pattern. Cuttlefish display the WS in the presence of pebble-like objects, and they can shade it to render the appearance of surface curvature to a human observer, which might benefit camouflage. Here we test how they colour the WS on visual backgrounds containing two-dimensional circular stimuli, some of which were shaded to suggest surface curvature, whereas others were uniformly coloured or divided into dark and light semicircles. WS shading, measured by lateral asymmetry, was greatest when the animal rested on a background of shaded circles and three-dimensional hemispheres, and less on plain white circles or black/white semicircles. In addition, shading was enhanced when light fell from the lighter side of the shaded stimulus, as expected for real convex surfaces. Thus, the cuttlefish acts as if it perceives surface curvature from shading, and takes account of the direction of illumination. However, the direction of WS shading is insensitive to the directions of background shading and illumination; instead the cuttlefish tend to turn to face the light source.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal vision; cephalopod; visual cognition; visual depth; visual ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984626      PMCID: PMC4810872          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  Disruptive body patterning of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) requires visual information regarding edges and contrast of objects in natural substrate backgrounds.

Authors:  Chuan-Chin Chiao; Emma J Kelman; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.818

2.  3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrew E Welchman; Arne Deubelius; Verena Conrad; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons.

Authors:  Brian R Cavoto; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07

4.  Symmetrical crypsis and asymmetrical signalling in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  Keri V Langridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Shape from shading in pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Art Kieres; Nicholas Commons-Miller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-06-29

6.  Depth perception: cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) respond to visual texture density gradients.

Authors:  Noam Josef; Ofri Mann; António V Sykes; Graziano Fiorito; João Reis; Steven Maccusker; Nadav Shashar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  J B Messenger
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1968 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Edge detection and texture classification by cuttlefish.

Authors:  Sarah Zylinski; Daniel Osorio; Adam J Shohet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The W-shaped pupil in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis): functions for improving horizontal vision.

Authors:  Lydia M Mäthger; Roger T Hanlon; Jonas Håkansson; Dan-Eric Nilsson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  A review of cuttlefish camouflage and object recognition and evidence for depth perception.

Authors:  Emma J Kelman; Daniel Osorio; Roland J Baddeley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  4 in total

1.  Countershading enhances camouflage by reducing prey contrast.

Authors:  Callum G Donohue; Jan M Hemmi; Jennifer L Kelley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  3D Camouflage in an Ornithischian Dinosaur.

Authors:  Jakob Vinther; Robert Nicholls; Stephan Lautenschlager; Michael Pittman; Thomas G Kaye; Emily Rayfield; Gerald Mayr; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Is countershading camouflage robust to lighting change due to weather?

Authors:  Olivier Penacchio; P George Lovell; Julie M Harris
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Cuttlefish use stereopsis to strike at prey.

Authors:  R C Feord; M E Sumner; S Pusdekar; L Kalra; P T Gonzalez-Bellido; Trevor J Wardill
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 14.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.