Anthony J Olszanski1, David C Smith2, Luis H Camacho3, John Thompson4, Suresh S Ramalingam5, R Donald Harvey5, Luis Campos6, David Ferry7, Shande Tang7, Ling Gao7, Howard Safran8. 1. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA anthony.olszanski@fccc.edu. 2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Center for Oncology and Blood Disorders, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington, USA. 5. Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 6. Oncology Consultants, Houston, Texas, USA. 7. Eli Lilly and Company, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA. 8. Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
QTcF correction change from baseline was the primary endpoint for this study. Fifty-one
patients received at least 9 weeks of ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) plus diphenhydramine
treatment (the complete corrected QT [QTc] evaluation period). Using the time-matched
QTcF values from day −1 as the baseline, repeated-measures analysis of covariance
showed that the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence intervals of the least
square means of change from baseline for QTcF values was less than 10 milliseconds at
all study time points in cycle 3 (Fig. 1). The
first 16 patients received treatment with moxifloxacin (400 mg orally), an antibiotic
associated with mild QTc prolongation, which demonstrated assay sensitivity.
Figure 1.
Graph showing 90% confidence interval of change from baseline at cycle 3 for QTcF
after ramucirumab plus diphenhydramine treatment. Red dotted line and blue dotted
line indicate 10- and 5-millisecond time points, respectively. The scale of the
x-axis (time) is non-uniform.
Abbreviation: QTcF, QT corrected by Fridericia’s formula.
Graph showing 90% confidence interval of change from baseline at cycle 3 for QTcF
after ramucirumab plus diphenhydramine treatment. Red dotted line and blue dotted
line indicate 10- and 5-millisecond time points, respectively. The scale of the
x-axis (time) is non-uniform.Abbreviation: QTcF, QT corrected by Fridericia’s formula.The relationship between ramucirumab concentrations and change in QTcF was assessed
using data from time points at which both the electrocardiogram data and the
concentration data were available; the time-matched mean change from baseline QTcF was
analyzed for correlation with the serum concentration of ramucirumab, using linear mixed
models (Fig. 2). The slope of the model in this
analysis was not statistically significantly different from zero. The estimated value of
the slope was −0.00207, showing a small negative association between
concentration of ramucirumab and the change from baseline in QTcF. Mean ramucirumab
concentration-time profiles at cycles 1 and 3 were very similar, with slightly higher
mean concentrations for cycle 3, reflecting a small amount of accumulation following 3
doses of ramucirumab.
Figure 2.
QTcF changes from baseline versus total drug concentrations at cycle 3 for the
evaluable population. Mean Cmax = 571 µg/mL. Mean change in
QTcF at mean Cmax = 2.8 milliseconds (90% CI: −3.8 to
9.5).
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; QTcF, QT corrected by Fridericia’s
formula.
QTcF changes from baseline versus total drug concentrations at cycle 3 for the
evaluable population. Mean Cmax = 571 µg/mL. Mean change in
QTcF at mean Cmax = 2.8 milliseconds (90% CI: −3.8 to
9.5).Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; QTcF, QT corrected by Fridericia’s
formula.Safety analyses included all treated patients (n = 66). Most
treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients receiving ramucirumab were
consistent with the known adverse event (AE) profile. Sixty-five patients experienced at
least one TEAE, regardless of causality. Forty-two patients (63.6%) experienced at least
one TEAE considered related to ramucirumab; the most common were headache (16.7%; 1.5%
grade 3), nausea (15.2%), hypertension (10.6%; 4.5% grade 3), and vomiting (10.6%).This phase II study demonstrated that ramucirumab did not produce a prolongation of
QTcF. The 90% two-sided (95% one-sided) upper confidence limit did not exceed 10
milliseconds. This conclusion is also supported by concentration-QTcF modeling, which
showed a visible but not significant negative association between concentration of
ramucirumab and change from baseline in QTcF.
Authors: Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Allen Lee Cohn; Radka Obermannova; Gyorgy Bodoky; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; David C Portnoy; Eric Van Cutsem; Axel Grothey; Jana Prausová; Pilar Garcia-Alfonso; Kentaro Yamazaki; Philip R Clingan; Sara Lonardi; Tae Won Kim; Lorinda Simms; Shao-Chun Chang; Federico Nasroulah Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-04-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Charles S Fuchs; Jiri Tomasek; Cho Jae Yong; Filip Dumitru; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Chanchal Goswami; Howard Safran; Lucas Vieira Dos Santos; Giuseppe Aprile; David R Ferry; Bohuslav Melichar; Mustapha Tehfe; Eldar Topuzov; John Raymond Zalcberg; Ian Chau; William Campbell; Choondal Sivanandan; Joanna Pikiel; Minori Koshiji; Yanzhi Hsu; Astra M Liepa; Ling Gao; Jonathan D Schwartz; Josep Tabernero Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carlo L Bello; Marilyn Mulay; Xin Huang; Shem Patyna; Melissa Dinolfo; Steven Levine; Andrew Van Vugt; Melvin Toh; Charles Baum; Lee Rosen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Edward B Garon; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Oscar Arrieta; Kumar Prabhash; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Tuncay Goksel; Keunchil Park; Vera Gorbunova; Ruben Dario Kowalyszyn; Joanna Pikiel; Grzegorz Czyzewicz; Sergey V Orlov; Conrad R Lewanski; Michael Thomas; Paolo Bidoli; Shaker Dakhil; Steven Gans; Joo-Hang Kim; Alexandru Grigorescu; Nina Karaseva; Martin Reck; Federico Cappuzzo; Ekaterine Alexandris; Andreas Sashegyi; Sergey Yurasov; Maurice Pérol Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer L Spratlin; Roger B Cohen; Matthew Eadens; Lia Gore; D Ross Camidge; Sami Diab; Stephen Leong; Cindy O'Bryant; Laura Q M Chow; Natalie J Serkova; Neal J Meropol; Nancy L Lewis; E Gabriela Chiorean; Floyd Fox; Hagop Youssoufian; Eric K Rowinsky; S Gail Eckhardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E G Chiorean; H I Hurwitz; R B Cohen; J D Schwartz; R P Dalal; F E Fox; L Gao; C J Sweeney Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 32.976