Literature DB >> 26984301

Empirical analysis of BMD metrics in genetic toxicology part II: in vivo potency comparisons to promote reductions in the use of experimental animals for genetic toxicity assessment.

John W Wills1, Alexandra S Long2, George E Johnson3, Jeffrey C Bemis4, Stephen D Dertinger4, Wout Slob5, Paul A White1.   

Abstract

Genotoxicity tests have traditionally been used only for hazard identification, with qualitative dichotomous groupings being used to identify compounds that have the capacity to induce mutations and/or cytogenetic alterations. However, there is an increasing interest in employing quantitative analysis of in vivo dose-response data to derive point of departure (PoD) metrics that can be used to establish human exposure limits or margins of exposure (MOEs), thereby supporting human health risk assessments and regulatory decisions. This work is an extension of our companion article on in vitro dose-response analyses and outlines how the combined benchmark dose (BMD) approach across included covariates can be used to improve the analyses and interpretation of in vivo genetic toxicity dose-response data. Using the BMD-covariate approach, we show that empirical comparisons of micronucleus frequency dose-response data across multiple studies justifies dataset merging, with subsequent analyses improving the precision of BMD estimates and permitting attendant potency ranking of seven clastogens. Similarly, empirical comparisons of Pig-a mutant phenotype frequency data collected in males and females justified dataset merging across sex. This permitted more effective scrutiny regarding the effect of post-exposure sampling time on the mutagenicity of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea observed in reticulocytes and erythrocytes in the Pig-a assay. The BMD-covariate approach revealed tissue-specific differences in the induction of lacZ transgene mutations in Muta™Mouse specimens exposed to benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), with the results permitting the formulation of mechanistic hypotheses regarding the observed potency ranking. Lastly, we illustrate how historical dose-response data for assessments that examined numerous doses (i.e. induced lacZ mutant frequency (MF) across 10 doses of BaP) can be used to improve the precision of BMDs derived from datasets with far fewer doses (i.e. lacZ MF for 3 doses of dibenz[a,h]anthracene). Collectively, the presented examples illustrate how innovative use of the BMD approach can permit refinement of the use of in vivo data; improving the efficacy of experimental animal use in genetic toxicology without sacrificing PoD precision. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984301     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gew009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  11 in total

1.  Pig-a gene mutation assay study design: critical assessment of 3- versus 28-day repeat-dose treatment schedules.

Authors:  Azeddine Elhajouji; Tamsanqa Tafara Hove; Oliver O'Connell; Hansjoerg Martus; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored protein deficiency serves as a reliable reporter of Pig-a gene Mutation: Support from an in vitro assay based on L5178Y/Tk+/- cells and the CD90.2 antigen.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Carson Labash; Page McKinzie; Javier Revollo; Vasily N Dobrovolsky; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Comparative Genotoxicity of TEMPO and 3 of Its Derivatives in Mouse Lymphoma Cells.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Guo; Ji-Eun Seo; Steven M Bryce; Jenna A Tan; Qiangen Wu; Stacey L Dial; Martha M Moore; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Utility of a next-generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the pharmaceutical drug candidate etoposide.

Authors:  John Nicolette; Mirjam Luijten; Jennifer C Sasaki; Laura Custer; Michelle Embry; Roland Froetschl; George Johnson; Gladys Ouedraogo; Raja Settivari; Veronique Thybaud; Kerry L Dearfield
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.579

5.  Benchmark dose analyses of multiple genetic toxicity endpoints permit robust, cross-tissue comparisons of MutaMouse responses to orally delivered benzo[a]pyrene.

Authors:  Alexandra S Long; John W Wills; Dorothy Krolak; Matthew Guo; Stephen D Dertinger; Volker M Arlt; Paul A White
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Comparing BMD-derived genotoxic potency estimations across variants of the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay.

Authors:  John W Wills; George E Johnson; Hannah L Battaion; Wout Slob; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Utility of a next generation framework for assessment of genomic damage: A case study using the industrial chemical benzene.

Authors:  Mirjam Luijten; Nicholas S Ball; Kerry L Dearfield; B Bhaskar Gollapudi; George E Johnson; Federica Madia; Lauren Peel; Stefan Pfuhler; Raja S Settivari; Wouter Ter Burg; Paul A White; Jan van Benthem
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  A Method for Comparing the Impact on Carcinogenicity of Tobacco Products: A Case Study on Heated Tobacco Versus Cigarettes.

Authors:  Wout Slob; Lya G Soeteman-Hernández; Wieneke Bil; Yvonne C M Staal; W Edryd Stephens; Reinskje Talhout
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  The 28 + 28 day design is an effective sampling time for analyzing mutant frequencies in rapidly proliferating tissues of MutaMouse animals.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Gu Zhou; Danielle LeBlanc; Paul A White; Andrew Williams; Carole L Yauk; George R Douglas
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Evaluation of the automated MicroFlow® and Metafer™ platforms for high-throughput micronucleus scoring and dose response analysis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Jatin R Verma; Benjamin J Rees; Eleanor C Wilde; Catherine A Thornton; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.