Literature DB >> 26983841

Cell-Instructive Graphene-Containing Nanocomposites Induce Multinucleated Myotube Formation.

Akhil Patel1, Yingfei Xue1, Shilpaa Mukundan1, Lisa C Rohan1, Vinayak Sant1, Donna B Stolz2,3, Shilpa Sant4,5,6.   

Abstract

Myoblast differentiation is a key step in myogenesis and has long been considered to be controlled mainly by biochemical cues such as growth factors. However, the tissue engineering approaches based on biochemical cues demonstrate low reproducibility as a precise spatial control over their bioactivity is challenging. Recently, substrate micro/nano-structure and electro-responsive properties are recognized for their important roles in myoblast differentiation. In this study, we hypothesized that engineering biophysical features such as nano/micro-fibrous structure and conductive properties into a single biomaterial scaffold will instruct the myoblasts to differentiate into multinucleated myotubes even in the absence of differentiation media. We fabricated nanocomposite scaffolds composed of conductive graphene nanosheets and polycaprolactone (PCL), a widely used biocompatible material. The resulting graphene-PCL scaffolds possess excellent conductivity due to graphene nanosheets and great processability, biodegradability and elastic mechanical properties conferred by PCL. Additionally, physicochemical and mechanical properties of nanocomposite scaffolds can be tuned by varying graphene concentration. Further, graphene-PCL nanocomposites and their 8-week degradation products exhibited remarkable cytocompatibility and promoted adhesion and proliferation of C2C12 mouse myoblast cells. Importantly, these nanocomposite scaffolds induced graphene concentration-dependent differentiation of C2C12 cells into multinucleated myotubes even in normal growth media suggesting their cell-instructive potential. Thus, graphene-PCL nanocomposite scaffolds can serve as a strategy to promote skeletal muscle regeneration without biochemical cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologic-free; Cell-instructive scaffolds; Electrospinning; Graphene nanosheet; Myoblast differentiation; Polycaprolactone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26983841     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1586-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  5 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of collagen-inspired mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Akhil Patel; Samer H Zaky; Karen Schoedel; Hongshuai Li; Vinayak Sant; Elia Beniash; Charles Sfeir; Donna B Stolz; Shilpa Sant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanofilm and Chicken Embryo Muscle Extract on Muscle Progenitor Cell Differentiation and Contraction.

Authors:  Jaśmina Bałaban; Mateusz Wierzbicki; Marlena Zielińska; Jarosław Szczepaniak; Malwina Sosnowska; Karolina Daniluk; Dominik Cysewski; Piotr Koczoń; André Chwalibog; Ewa Sawosz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  3D Graphene Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Valentina Palmieri; Francesca Sciandra; Manuela Bozzi; Marco De Spirito; Massimiliano Papi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-05

4.  Prechondrogenic ATDC5 Cell Attachment and Differentiation on Graphene Foam; Modulation by Surface Functionalization with Fibronectin.

Authors:  Stephanie M Frahs; Jonathon C Reeck; Katie M Yocham; Anders Frederiksen; Kiyo Fujimoto; Crystal M Scott; Richard S Beard; Raquel J Brown; Trevor J Lujan; Ilia A Solov'yov; David Estrada; Julia Thom Oxford
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 5.  Advancements and Applications in the Composites of Silk Fibroin and Graphene-Based Materials.

Authors:  Zhimin Xu; Yujie Ma; Huanyan Dai; Shuang Tan; Bing Han
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.