Brandon A Kohrt1, Carla B Marienfeld2, Catherine Panter-Brick3, Alexander C Tsai4, Milton L Wainberg5. 1. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. brandon.kohrt@duke.edu. 2. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the field of global mental health, there is a need for identifying core values and competencies to guide training programs in professional practice as well as in academia. This paper presents the results of interdisciplinary discussions fostered during an annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture to develop recommendations for value-driven innovation in global mental health training. METHODS: Participants (n = 48), who registered for a dedicated workshop on global mental health training advertised in conference proceedings, included both established faculty and current students engaged in learning, practice, and research. They proffered recommendations in five areas of training curriculum: values, competencies, training experiences, resources, and evaluation. RESULTS: Priority values included humility, ethical awareness of power differentials, collaborative action, and "deep accountability" when working in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Competencies included flexibility and tolerating ambiguity when working across diverse settings, the ability to systematically evaluate personal biases, historical and linguistic proficiency, and evaluation skills across a range of stakeholders. Training experiences included didactics, language training, self-awareness, and supervision in immersive activities related to professional or academic work. Resources included connections with diverse faculty such as social scientists and mentors in addition to medical practitioners, institutional commitment through protected time and funding, and sustainable collaborations with partners in low resource settings. Finally, evaluation skills built upon community-based participatory methods, 360-degree feedback from partners in low-resource settings, and observed structured clinical evaluations (OSCEs) with people of different cultural backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: Global mental health training, as envisioned in this workshop, exemplifies an ethos of working through power differentials across clinical, professional, and social contexts in order to form longstanding collaborations. If incorporated into the ACGME/ABPN Psychiatry Milestone Project, such recommendations will improve training gained through international experiences as well as the everyday training of mental health professionals, global health practitioners, and social scientists.
OBJECTIVE: In the field of global mental health, there is a need for identifying core values and competencies to guide training programs in professional practice as well as in academia. This paper presents the results of interdisciplinary discussions fostered during an annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture to develop recommendations for value-driven innovation in global mental health training. METHODS:Participants (n = 48), who registered for a dedicated workshop on global mental health training advertised in conference proceedings, included both established faculty and current students engaged in learning, practice, and research. They proffered recommendations in five areas of training curriculum: values, competencies, training experiences, resources, and evaluation. RESULTS: Priority values included humility, ethical awareness of power differentials, collaborative action, and "deep accountability" when working in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Competencies included flexibility and tolerating ambiguity when working across diverse settings, the ability to systematically evaluate personal biases, historical and linguistic proficiency, and evaluation skills across a range of stakeholders. Training experiences included didactics, language training, self-awareness, and supervision in immersive activities related to professional or academic work. Resources included connections with diverse faculty such as social scientists and mentors in addition to medical practitioners, institutional commitment through protected time and funding, and sustainable collaborations with partners in low resource settings. Finally, evaluation skills built upon community-based participatory methods, 360-degree feedback from partners in low-resource settings, and observed structured clinical evaluations (OSCEs) with people of different cultural backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: Global mental health training, as envisioned in this workshop, exemplifies an ethos of working through power differentials across clinical, professional, and social contexts in order to form longstanding collaborations. If incorporated into the ACGME/ABPN Psychiatry Milestone Project, such recommendations will improve training gained through international experiences as well as the everyday training of mental health professionals, global health practitioners, and social scientists.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cross-cultural psychiatry; Curriculum development; Global mental health; Medical education; Training innovation
Authors: Jeffrey P Koplan; T Christopher Bond; Michael H Merson; K Srinath Reddy; Mario Henry Rodriguez; Nelson K Sewankambo; Judith N Wasserheit Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Brandon A Kohrt; Mark J D Jordans; Sauharda Rai; Pragya Shrestha; Nagendra P Luitel; Megan K Ramaiya; Daisy R Singla; Vikram Patel Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2015-03-24
Authors: Brandon A Kohrt; Nawaraj Upadhaya; Nagendra P Luitel; Sujen M Maharjan; Bonnie N Kaiser; Elizabeth K MacFarlane; Noreen Khan Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.462
Authors: Annika C Sweetland; Maria A Oquendo; Mohsin Sidat; Palmira F Santos; Sten H Vermund; Cristiane S Duarte; Melissa Arbuckle; Milton L Wainberg Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2014 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.462
Authors: Alexander C Tsai; Gregory L Fricchione; Rochelle P Walensky; Courtney Ng; David R Bangsberg; Vanessa B Kerry Journal: Acad Psychiatry Date: 2014-03-25
Authors: Kylie Ternes; Vijeth Iyengar; Helen Lavretsky; Walter D Dawson; Laura Booi; Agustin Ibanez; Ipsit Vahia; Charles Reynolds; Steven DeKosky; Jeffrey Cummings; Bruce Miller; Carla Perissinotto; Jeffrey Kaye; Harris A Eyre Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Manish Garg; Gregory L Peck; Bonnie Arquilla; Andrew C Miller; Sari E Soghoian; Harry L Anderson Iii; Christina Bloem; Michael S Firstenberg; Sagar C Galwankar; Weidun Alan Guo; Ricardo Izurieta; Elizabeth Krebs; Bhakti Hansoti; Sudip Nanda; Chinenye O Nwachuku; Benedict Nwomeh; Lorenzo Paladino; Thomas J Papadimos; Richard P Sharpe; Mamta Swaroop; Stanislaw P Stawicki Journal: Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Date: 2017 Oct-Dec
Authors: Colin Buzza; Anna Fiskin; Jorien Campbell; Jennifer Guo; Jacob Izenberg; Barbara Kamholz; Erick Hung; Bibhav Acharya Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 2.462