Literature DB >> 26983098

Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: encoding and suffix interference effects.

Louise A Brown1, Elaine H Niven2, Robert H Logie2, Stephen Rhodes2, Richard J Allen3.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated younger (18-25 yrs) and older (70-88 yrs) adults' temporary memory for colour-shape combinations (binding). We focused upon estimating the magnitude of the binding cost for each age group across encoding time (Experiment 1; 900/1500 ms), presentation format (Experiment 2; simultaneous/sequential), and interference (Experiment 3; control/suffix) conditions. In Experiment 1, encoding time did not differentially influence binding in the two age groups. In Experiment 2, younger adults exhibited poorer binding performance with sequential relative to simultaneous presentation, and serial position analyses highlighted a particular age-related difficulty remembering the middle item of a series (for all memory conditions). Experiments 1-3 demonstrated small to medium binding effect sizes in older adults across all encoding conditions, with binding less accurate than shape memory. However, younger adults also displayed negative effects of binding (small to large) in two of the experiments. Even when older adults exhibited a greater suffix interference effect in Experiment 3, this was for all memory types, not just binding. We therefore conclude that there is no consistent evidence for a visual binding deficit in healthy older adults. This relative preservation contrasts with the specific and substantial deficits in visual feature binding found in several recent studies of Alzheimer's disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Visual working memory; ageing/aging; associative deficits; binding; older adults

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26983098     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1156705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  7 in total

1.  Feature Binding and Working Memory in Children with ADHD: Evidence of Episodic Buffer Impairment.

Authors:  R Matt Alderson; Stephanie J Tarle; Delanie K Roberts; Jessica L Betancourt; Caitlin C Bullard
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2021-10-06

2.  Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Feature Binding of Common Everyday Items Is Not Affected by Age.

Authors:  Serge Hoefeijzers; Alfredis González Hernández; Angela Magnolia Rios; Mario A Parra
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Attention and binding in visual working memory: Two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer storage.

Authors:  Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  False Recognition in Short-Term Memory - Age-Differences in Confidence.

Authors:  Barbara Sikora-Wachowicz; Koryna Lewandowska; Attila Keresztes; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Tadeusz Marek; Magdalena Fafrowicz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-13

6.  Intact high-resolution working memory binding in a patient with developmental amnesia and selective hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Amy L Atkinson; Faraneh Vargha-Khadem; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.753

7.  Investigation of the relationship between visual feature binding in short- and long-term memory in healthy aging.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Zoltán Vidnyánszky; Annamária Manga; Petra Madurka; Pál Vakli
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.