Sandra L Spoelstra1, Alla Sikorskii2, Charles W Given3, Constantinos K Coursaris4, Atreyee Majumder2, Monica Schueller1, Barbara A Given5. 1. 1 Kirkhof College of Nursing, Grand Valley State University , Grand Rapids, Michigan. 2. 2 Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University , East Lansing, Michigan. 3. 3 Department of Family Medicine, Michigan State University , East Lansing, Michigan. 4. 4 Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies, Michigan State University , East Lansing, Michigan. 5. 5 College of Nursing, Michigan State University , East Lansing, Michigan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Text messaging (TMs) on cell phones is emerging as an effective means of delivering behavioral interventions. However, little is known about TM use in adult cancer patients. The present study aimed to extend knowledge on acceptability of a TM intervention in adult cancer patients; examine factors of those screened and enrolled; and compare recruitment at a large national specialty pharmacy versus community-based cancer clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screening, enrollment, and baseline data collected in two randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of TMs on medication adherence or symptom severity in adults prescribed oral anticancer agents were linked. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, t-tests, and generalized linear modeling were used to examine sociodemographics, cancer type and stage, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, social support, and symptoms. RESULTS: The cancer clinics screened 293 patients, 43% were eligible, and 56% consented. The specialty pharmacy screened 169 patients, 72% were eligible, and 74% consented. Mean age was 58 years and did not differ by recruitment setting. Later stage disease (p = 0.01) and higher number of symptoms (p < 0.01), and symptom severity (p = 0.02) and interference (p = 0.01) were observed among patients recruited at the specialty pharmacy. No group differences were found for depression, physical function, cognition, self-efficacy, or social support. DISCUSSION: Adult cancer patients were likely to participate in a TM intervention trial. Recruiting through the specialty pharmacy reached a population with higher cell phone ownership and TM usage; with greater interest in a TM intervention compared to the cancer clinics.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Text messaging (TMs) on cell phones is emerging as an effective means of delivering behavioral interventions. However, little is known about TM use in adult cancerpatients. The present study aimed to extend knowledge on acceptability of a TM intervention in adult cancerpatients; examine factors of those screened and enrolled; and compare recruitment at a large national specialty pharmacy versus community-based cancer clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Screening, enrollment, and baseline data collected in two randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of TMs on medication adherence or symptom severity in adults prescribed oral anticancer agents were linked. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, t-tests, and generalized linear modeling were used to examine sociodemographics, cancer type and stage, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, social support, and symptoms. RESULTS: The cancer clinics screened 293 patients, 43% were eligible, and 56% consented. The specialty pharmacy screened 169 patients, 72% were eligible, and 74% consented. Mean age was 58 years and did not differ by recruitment setting. Later stage disease (p = 0.01) and higher number of symptoms (p < 0.01), and symptom severity (p = 0.02) and interference (p = 0.01) were observed among patients recruited at the specialty pharmacy. No group differences were found for depression, physical function, cognition, self-efficacy, or social support. DISCUSSION: Adult cancerpatients were likely to participate in a TM intervention trial. Recruiting through the specialty pharmacy reached a population with higher cell phone ownership and TM usage; with greater interest in a TM intervention compared to the cancer clinics.
Entities:
Keywords:
cancer; m-health; oncology; randomized controlled trial; recruitment; text messaging
Authors: Sandra L Spoelstra; Charles W Given; Alla Sikorskii; Constantinos K Coursaris; Atreyee Majumder; Tracy DeKoekkoek; Monica Schueller; Barbara A Given Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Keren Lehavot; David Huh; Karina L Walters; Kevin M King; Michele P Andrasik; Jane M Simoni Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: F Bassan; F Peter; B Houbre; M J Brennstuhl; M Costantini; E Speyer; C Tarquinio Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2013-09-15 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Bonnie Spring; Kristin Schneider; H Gene McFadden; Jocelyn Vaughn; Andrea T Kozak; Malaina Smith; Arlen C Moller; Leonard H Epstein; Andrew Demott; Donald Hedeker; Juned Siddique; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-05-28
Authors: Ari J Elliot; Christopher J Mooney; Kathryn Z Douthit; Martin F Lynch Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Ann M Mazzella Ebstein; Margaret Barton-Burke; Venice Anthony; Andrea Smith; Zhigang Zhang; Mark Robson Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 3.187