| Literature DB >> 26982367 |
Bernhard Mlecnik1, Gabriela Bindea1, Helen K Angell2, Pauline Maby3, Mihaela Angelova4, David Tougeron5, Sarah E Church1, Lucie Lafontaine1, Maria Fischer6, Tessa Fredriksen1, Maristella Sasso1, Amélie M Bilocq1, Amos Kirilovsky1, Anna C Obenauf7, Mohamad Hamieh8, Anne Berger9, Patrick Bruneval10, Jean-Jacques Tuech11, Jean-Christophe Sabourin12, Florence Le Pessot12, Jacques Mauillon13, Arash Rafii14, Pierre Laurent-Puig15, Michael R Speicher7, Zlatko Trajanoski6, Pierre Michel16, Richard Sesboüe8, Thierry Frebourg17, Franck Pagès18, Viia Valge-Archer19, Jean-Baptiste Latouche20, Jérôme Galon21.
Abstract
Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer predicts favorable outcomes. However, the mechanistic relationship between microsatellite instability, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, Immunoscore, and their impact on patient survival remains to be elucidated. We found significant differences in mutational patterns, chromosomal instability, and gene expression that correlated with patient microsatellite instability status. A prominent immune gene expression was observed in microsatellite-instable (MSI) tumors, as well as in a subgroup of microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. MSI tumors had increased frameshift mutations, showed genetic evidence of immunoediting, had higher densities of Th1, effector-memory T cells, in situ proliferating T cells, and inhibitory PD1-PDL1 cells, had high Immunoscores, and were infiltrated with mutation-specific cytotoxic T cells. Multivariate analysis revealed that Immunoscore was superior to microsatellite instability in predicting patients' disease-specific recurrence and survival. These findings indicate that assessment of the immune status via Immunoscore provides a potent indicator of tumor recurrence beyond microsatellite-instability staging that could be an important guide for immunotherapy strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26982367 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immunity ISSN: 1074-7613 Impact factor: 31.745