Literature DB >> 26981619

Endoscopic treatment of food intolerance after a banded gastric bypass: inducing band erosion for removal using a plastic stent.

Josemberg Marins Campos1, Rena C Moon2, Galeno E J Magalhães Neto1, Andre F Teixeira2, Muhammad A Jawad2, Lyz Bezerra Silva1, Manoel Galvão Neto3, Álvaro Antônio B Ferraz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Ring complications after a banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are usually managed surgically. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic removal of noneroded rings after banded-RYGB, by inducing intragastric erosion of the ring using a self-expandable plastic stent (SEPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients with banded RYGB who had noneroded rings and food intolerance were prospectively enrolled. Patients were treated with endoscopic SEPS placement and ring removal. Data from time of stenting, resolution of symptoms, need for endoscopic dilation, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Successful ring removal was possible in all patients. In 21 cases, the SEPS induced complete erosion, and in 17 cases the ring was removed a month later because of incomplete erosion at the time of SEPS removal. Nine patients (22.0 %) needed endoscopic dilation after stent removal in order to treat fibrotic strictures. Food tolerance was observed in 32 patients (78.0 %) after the procedure. No patient needed surgery and there were no deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal of the ring using SEPS appeared to be safe and effective after a banded RYGB. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26981619     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-103418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  7 in total

1.  Cardiogastric Fistula as a Rare Complication After Gastric Banding and Hiatal Hernia Surgery.

Authors:  Raquel Alfonso Ballester; Mari Carmen Fernández Moreno; María Lapeña Rodríguez; Rosa Martí Fernández; José Villegas Morera; Norberto Cassinello Fernández; Joaquín Ortega Serrano
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  A Spanish Society joint SECO and SEEDO approach to the Post-operative management of the patients undergoing surgery for obesity.

Authors:  R Vilallonga; J L Pereira-Cunill; S Morales-Conde; I Alarcón; I Breton; E Domínguez-Adame; J V Ferrer; A Garcia Ruiz-de-Gordejuela; A Goday; A Lecube; E Martín García-Almenta; M Á Rubio; F J Tinahones; P P García-Luna
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Innovative solutions in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Tomasz Kozlowski; Krzysztof Kozakiewicz; Jacek Dadan; Piotr Mysliwiec
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-10

4.  Banded RYGB Ring Slippage Endoscopic Removal with Self-expandable Stents: a Comparative Study Between Metallic and Plastic One.

Authors:  Luiz Gustavo de Quadros; Daniela Coca Germany Faria; Manoel Galvão Neto; Vitor Brunaldi; Idiberto José Zotarelli Filho; Mikaell Alexandre Gouvêa Faria; Eduardo Grecco; Mario Flamini Junior; Sâmara Fernandes Santos Martins; André Teixeira; Cinthia Barbosa de Andrade; Alvaro Antonio Bandeira Ferraz; Roberto Luiz Kaiser Junior
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Stent-induced compression necrosis for the endoscopic removal of a partially eroded Lap-Band.

Authors:  Ali Talib; Rogier de Ridder; Jan Willem Straathof; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-13

6.  Endoscopic Approach for Major Complications of Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Moon Kyung Joo
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-12-23

7.  Status of bariatric endoscopy-what does the surgeon need to know? A review.

Authors:  Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Anna Carolina Batista Dantas; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Thomas R McCarty; Flávio Roberto Takeda; Marco Aurelio Santo; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-02-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.