Literature DB >> 26981347

The Escherichia coli transcriptome linked to growth fitness.

Bei-Wen Ying1, Kazuma Yama2, Kazuki Kitahara2, Tetsuya Yomo2.   

Abstract

A series of Escherichia coli strains with varied genomic sequences were subjected to high-density microarray analyses to elucidate the fitness-correlated transcriptomes. Fitness, which is commonly evaluated by the growth rate during the exponential phase, is not only determined by the genome but is also linked to growth conditions, e.g., temperature. We previously reported genetic and environmental contributions to E. coli transcriptomes and evolutionary transcriptome changes in thermal adaptation. Here, we describe experimental details on how to prepare microarray samples that truly represent the growth fitness of the E. coli cells. A step-by-step record of sample preparation procedures that correspond to growing cells and transcriptome data sets that are deposited at the GEO database (GSE33212, GSE52770, GSE61739) are also provided for reference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Escherichia coli; Growth fitness; Microarray; Transcriptome

Year:  2015        PMID: 26981347      PMCID: PMC4778597          DOI: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Data        ISSN: 2213-5960


Direct link to deposited data

The data set is available at the GEO database under: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE33212. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE52770. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61749.

Experimental design, materials and methods

The key purpose of bacterial transcriptome analyses is to strictly correlate a gene expression pattern, i.e., microarray data, and cellular physiology, which is generally represented by the growth fitness [1], [2], [3]. In particular, evolution studies focus on evolutionary changes in gene expression, which must be precisely linked to increased fitness. Our studies critically consider the correlation between cell growth rate and the transcriptome. Thus, the following experimental procedures, which were excluded from the Materials and Methods of the original papers [4], [5], [6], were performed. The details described here can be used to reproduce our deposited transcriptome data sets and the corresponding analytical results.

Strains and cell cultures

The genetic backgrounds of the Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains used for the transcriptome analyses are in previous reports [4], [5], [6]. An overview of these strains is shown in the Specifications table in the Data in Brief. All cell cultures were carried out in 5 mL in glass culture tubes (φ16 mm × 180 mm) with a silicon cap. E. coli cells were commonly grown in the minimal medium M63 (62 mM K2HPO4, 39 mM KH2PO4, 15 mM (NH4)2SO4, 2 μM FeSO4·7H2O, 15 μM thiamine hydrochloride, 203 μM MgSO4·7H2O and 22 mM glucose) for the precise control of the components for cell growth. The culture media (M63 or in the supplemental chemicals if required) and temperatures as well as the incubators and rotational (shaking) speeds are described in the original papers [4], [5], [6] and in the data summaries deposited at the GEO database.

Serial transfer

To determine the constant growth dynamics, the E. coli cells were serially transferred for a few days until they reached a relatively constant growth rate. Cell stocks stored with 10–15% glycerol at − 80 °C were used to inoculate the corresponding media. An overnight culture of the E. coli cells typically reached saturated growth. This overnight culture mixture was subsequently transferred to fresh media through a series of dilutions, i.e., 103-, 104- and 105-fold, and cultured overnight again. The culture with a cell concentration (or OD600 value) in the range of 107–108 cells/mL (roughly equivalent to OD600 = 0.01–0.2) among the diluted cultures was used for the following serial transfer. The dilution rates were changed accordingly; for instance, if the 104 dilution culture was selected, then the following serial transfer featured the dilution factors 104, 105 and 106. The growth rate (μ) was calculated using the following equation (Eq. (1)). Here, C and C represent the initial and final cell concentrations (OD600 values), and t and t indicate the initial and final cell culture time points, respectively. A serial transfer was performed repeatedly until equivalent growth rates were detected in two continuous days (transfers), which often required three to five days. The final cell culture in the early or middle exponential growth phase was stored in 10–20 tubes at a small dose (50–200 μL) per tube for future analyses. The newly prepared glycerol stocks (single tubes) were used once, and the remainder was discarded.

Precise measurement of the growth curve

If a cell population was supposed to be heterogeneous, this property would disappear upon repeated serial transfers. Thus, we carefully measured growth curves of the cell stocks, to determine the timing for the exponential growth phase of the cell populations. After inoculating the fresh media with the glycerol stock, the initial cell concentration was measured using a flow cytometer (FACSCanto™ II, Becton, Dickinson and Company) or a cell counter (Multisizer™ 3 coulter counter, Beckman). Temporal changes in the cell concentration was monitored every 2–3 h until the cell culture approached a high density (approximately 5 × 108 cells/mL) close to the saturated concentration (approximately 2 × 109 cells/mL). Using the growth curve, we determined the exponential growth phase, and, consequently, we estimated the timing of cell collection for the microarray analyses. Based on the estimated culture time, the cells were cultured until the cell density reached the expected magnitude, and the cells were collected for transcriptome analyses. The initial and final cell concentrations as well as the growth rates that correspond to the deposited GEO data sets are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Details on the cell samples used for the transcriptome analyses. The samples are indicated by the names of the E. coli strains used in the transcriptome studies and the number of replicas. The Temp., Initial conc., Final conc., and μ represent the temperatures for cell growth, the initial and final cell concentrations of the cultures, and the growth rate calculated using the initial and final cell concentrations as well as culture times, respectively. The Total cells indicate the number of cells used for the total RNA isolation, and the RNAs represent the quantity of total RNA purified from the cells. The cDNAs indicate the quantity of cDNAs that were reverse transcribed from every 10 μg of the total RNA.

Samples
Temp.
Initial conc.
Final conc.
μ
Total cells
RNAs
cDNAs
(Replica no.)(°C)(Cells/mL)(Cells/mL)(h− 1)(cells)(μg)(μg)
MDS42 (1)371.0e44.8e80.768.0e828.95.5
MDS42 (2)371.0e42.1e80.711.1e932.84.7
MDS42 (3)371.0e44.3e80.747.2e825.85.0
MDS42 (4)371.0e41.3e80.736.5e822.24.4
MDS42 (5)371.0e44.3e80.738.5e839.34.9
MDS42 (6)371.0e42.7e80.761.4e935.34.2
MDS42 (7)371.0e41.4e80.747.0e821.85.8
MG1655 (1)371.0e49.8e70.644.9e820.45.8
MG1655 (2)371.0e41.3e80.651.3e951.35.8
MG1655 (3)371.0e41.2e80.705.9e822.85.1
MG1655 (4)371.0e41.2e80.705.9e824.44.3
MG1655 (5)371.0e41.3e80.706.3e825.75.1
MG1655 (6)371.0e41.4e80.716.9e827.64.9
MG1655 (7)371.0e41.2e80.706.1e824.15.0
Type II (1)36.91.0e41.4e80.466.9e826.35.3
Type II (2)36.91.0e41.0e80.515.1e821.55.2
Type II (3)36.91.0e49.2e70.514.6e818.24.8
Type II (1)44.71.0e71.6e80.397.9e822.66.2
Type II (2)44.79.0e61.1e80.235.4e822.14.9
Type II (3)44.79.0e61.4e80.256.9e820.14.6
Type III (1)36.91.0e41.0e80.525.0e812.74.1
Type III (2)36.91.0e41.0e80.575.2e817.43.7
Type III (3)36.91.0e41.0e80.575.2e816.63.9
Type III (1)44.79.0e69.4e70.294.7e818.55.0
Type III (2)44.79.0e61.1e80.315.6e816.84.8
Type III (3)44.79.0e61.0e80.305.2e813.54.4
Anc (1)36.91.0e45.8e80.482.9e9164.55.9
Anc (2)36.91.0e43.0e80.451.5e9102.86.6
Anc (3)36.91.0e41.1e80.416.0e826.16.4
41B (1)36.91.0e41.1e80.665.3e818.14.5
41B (2)36.91.0e41.5e80.687.3e816.24.5
41B (3)36.91.0e41.9e80.709.3e817.44.6
41B (1)41.21.0e41.5e80.647.7e854.86.4
41B (2)41.21.0e42.1e80.661.0e940.96.7
41B (3)41.21.0e42.0e80.669.8e836.96.3
43B (1)36.91.0e46.7e80.691.5e981.15.6
43B (2)36.91.0e41.4e80.591.5e982.15.3
43B (3)36.91.0e41.3e80.591.4e974.35.2
43B (1)43.21.0e41.2e80.495.8e933.76.1
43B (2)43.21.0e41.6e80.518.2e846.26.0
43B (3)43.21.0e42.9e80.541.4e935.06.1
45 L (1)36.91.0e42.3e80.631.2e9132.85.2
45 L (2)36.91.0e41.3e80.596.3e842.66.6
45 L (3)36.91.0e41.4e80.606.9e837.66.2
45 L (1)44.81.0e43.5e80.481.8e9101.86.1
45 L (2)44.81.0e41.6e80.448.0e827.85.2
45 L (3)44.81.0e41.6e90.447.9e829.94.5

Cell collection and sample preparation

Exponentially growing cells were immediately collected for RNA isolation. A time-consuming cell collection procedure will disturb the RNA abundance because changes in mRNA often occur over a few minutes. The cell cultures in the exponential growth phase were interrupted by placing them directly into a cold phenolethanol solution (1 g of phenol in 10 mL of ethanol) that was prepared in advance. Immediately, the cells were collected using centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the pelleted cells were stored at − 80 °C prior to use. The total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The volume of the final elution buffer was 30 μL, which was used to generate a relatively high concentration of the total RNA (approx. 500–1000 μg/μL). The quantity of the purified total RNA was first determined based on the absorbance at 260 nm using a NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Second, a precise evaluation was performed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with an RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent Technologies) and electrophoresis with an agarose gel under reducing conditions. Every 10 μg of the purified total RNAs that passed quality control were used as templates for reverse transcription to generate the cDNA. The synthesized cDNA was purified using a MinElute kit (Qiagen) with a final elution of 10 μL. The final productivities of the total RNA purification and cDNA preparation are summarized in Table 1. Every 3 μg of cDNA was used for the following microarray gene expression analysis, which was performed using an Affymetrix GeneChip system. Fragmentation, labelling and hybridization of cDNA were carried out in accordance with the Affymetrix GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual. We slightly modified this method by increasing the incubation time to 2 h to improve the labelling efficiency. Three to seven independent experiments (from cell culture to sample preparation) were performed for each condition.
Specifications
Organism/cell line/tissueEscherichia coli K12 strainsMG1655, MDS42, DH1ΔleuB::gfp-Kmr
SexN/A
Sequencer or array typeHigh-density DNA tilling array (EcFs)
Data formatRaw (CEL file)
Experimental factorsGenome: wild type (MG1655) vs reduced (MDS42)Temperature: regular (37 °C) vs high (41–45 °C)Mutation: rpoH (Type II) vs groESLp (Type III)Evolution: thermal adaptive (41B, 43B, 45 L) vs ancestor (Anc)
Experimental featuresMicroarray gene expression profiling of a series of thermal adaptive E. coli cells growing under the regular and high temperatures
ConsentN/A
Sample source locationTsukuba and Osaka, Japan
  6 in total

1.  Functional specialization in regulation and quality control in thermal adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Kazuma Yama; Yuki Matsumoto; Yoshie Murakami; Shigeto Seno; Hideo Matsuda; Kazuyoshi Gotoh; Daisuke Motooka; Shota Nakamura; Bei-Wen Ying; Tetsuya Yomo
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Specific growth rate dependent transcriptome profiling of Escherichia coli K12 MG1655 in accelerostat cultures.

Authors:  Ranno Nahku; Kaspar Valgepea; Petri-Jaan Lahtvee; Sten Erm; Kristo Abner; Kaarel Adamberg; Raivo Vilu
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Physiological studies of Escherichia coli strain MG1655: growth defects and apparent cross-regulation of gene expression.

Authors:  Eric Soupene; Wally C van Heeswijk; Jacqueline Plumbridge; Valley Stewart; Daniel Bertenthal; Haidy Lee; Gyaneshwar Prasad; Oleg Paliy; Parinya Charernnoppakul; Sydney Kustu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Growth rate-coordinated transcriptome reorganization in bacteria.

Authors:  Yuki Matsumoto; Yoshie Murakami; Saburo Tsuru; Bei-Wen Ying; Tetsuya Yomo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Bacterial transcriptome reorganization in thermal adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Bei-Wen Ying; Yuki Matsumoto; Kazuki Kitahara; Shingo Suzuki; Naoaki Ono; Chikara Furusawa; Toshihiko Kishimoto; Tetsuya Yomo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Multilevel comparative analysis of the contributions of genome reduction and heat shock to the Escherichia coli transcriptome.

Authors:  Bei-Wen Ying; Shigeto Seno; Fuyuro Kaneko; Hideo Matsuda; Tetsuya Yomo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Correlation between genome reduction and bacterial growth.

Authors:  Masaomi Kurokawa; Shigeto Seno; Hideo Matsuda; Bei-Wen Ying
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2016-07-03       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Coordinated Changes in Mutation and Growth Rates Induced by Genome Reduction.

Authors:  Issei Nishimura; Masaomi Kurokawa; Liu Liu; Bei-Wen Ying
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Gene Expression Order Attributed to Genome Reduction and the Steady Cellular State in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Bei-Wen Ying; Kazuma Yama
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  The highly conserved chromosomal periodicity of transcriptomes and the correlation of its amplitude with the growth rate in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Motoki Nagai; Masaomi Kurokawa; Bei-Wen Ying
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.458

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.