Literature DB >> 26981180

Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenomas > 20 mm: Risk factors for recurrence.

Alexander Briedigkeit1, Omar Sultanie1, Bernd Sido1, Franz Ludwig Dumoulin1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate risk factors for local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenomas > 20 mm.
METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of 216 endoscopic mucosal resections for colorectal adenomas > 20 mm in 179 patients (40.3% female; median age 68 years; range 35-91 years). All patients had at least 1 follow-up endoscopy with a minimum control interval of 2 mo (mean follow-up 6 mo/2.0-43.4 mo). Possible factors associated with local recurrence were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Median size of the lesions was 30 mm (20-70 mm), 69.0% were localized in the right-sided (cecum, ascending and transverse) colon. Most of the lesions (85.6%) showed a non-pedunculated morphology and the majority of resections was in piecemeal technique (78.7%). Histology showed carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 51/216 (23.6%) lesions including 4 low risk carcinomas (pT1a, L0, V0, R0 - G1/G2). Histologically proven recurrence was observed in 33/216 patients (15.3%). Patient age > 65 years, polyp size > 30 mm, non-pedunculated morphology, localization in the right-sided colon, piecemeal resection and tubular-villous histology were found as associated factors in univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only localization in the right-sided colon (HR = 6.842/95%CI: 1.540-30.394; P = 0.011), tubular-villous histology (HR = 3.713/95%CI: 1.617-8.528; P = 0.002) and polyp size > 30 mm (HR = 2.563/95%CI: 1.179-5.570; P = 0.017) were significantly associated risk factors for adenoma recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Meticulous endoscopic follow-up is warranted after endoscopic mucosal resection of adenomas localized in the right-sided colon larger than > 30 mm, with tubular-villous histology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal adenoma; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Local recurrence rate; Piecemeal resection; Tubular-villous adenoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 26981180      PMCID: PMC4781909          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i5.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  32 in total

Review 1.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Malignant recurrence and distal metastasis after complete local resection of colorectal "high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia": incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Xu Biao Wei; Lei Xin; Jun Hao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  [S3-guideline colorectal cancer version 1.0].

Authors:  C Pox; S Aretz; S C Bischoff; U Graeven; M Hass; P Heußner; W Hohenberger; A Holstege; J Hübner; F Kolligs; M Kreis; P Lux; J Ockenga; R Porschen; S Post; N Rahner; A Reinacher-Schick; J F Riemann; R Sauer; A Sieg; W Scheppach; W Schmitt; H J Schmoll; K Schulmann; A Tannapfel; W Schmiegel
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 5.  Endoscopic resection of sessile colon polyps.

Authors:  B Joseph Elmunzer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Endoscopic piecemeal resection of large colorectal polyps with long-term followup.

Authors:  Lillias H Maguire; Paul C Shellito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is it suitable in western countries?

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner; Carlos Guarner-Argente; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study.

Authors:  Mate Knabe; Jürgen Pohl; Christian Gerges; Christian Ell; Horst Neuhaus; Brigitte Schumacher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Incidence and predictors of "late" recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas.

Authors:  Mouen Khashab; Emely Eid; Michael Rusche; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Quality in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Flaminia Purchiaroni; Guido Costamagna; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 2.  Current Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Gastrointestinal Lesions: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Submucosal Dissection, and Full-Thickness Resection.

Authors:  Arthur Hoffman; Raja Atreya; Timo Rath; Markus Ferdinand Neurath
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-03-31

3.  Polyp Resection - Controversial Practices and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection: propensity score analysis of old and new colonoscopes and Sydney recurrence tool implementation.

Authors:  Daniela Guerrero Vinsard; Pujan Kandel; Lady Katherine Mejia Perez; Russell L Bingham; Ryan J Lennon; Timothy A Woodward; Victoria Gomez; Massimo Raimondo; Ernest P Bouras; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-02-07

5.  Long-term follow-up after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in 182 cases.

Authors:  Christian Suchy; Moritz Berger; Ingo Steinbrück; Tsuneo Oyama; Naohisa Yahagi; Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-02-03

6.  Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Polyps Resected Using Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (UEMR) Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (CEMR).

Authors:  Mohamad Awf Mouchli; Shravani Reddy; Chirstopher Walsh; Adil Mir; Lindsey Bierle; Vikas Chitnavis; Paul Yeaton; Mohammad Shakhatreh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-14

7.  Adenoma Recurrence after Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection of Colorectal Flat Lesions: Applicability of the Sydney EMR Recurrence Tool in a Non-Tertiary Centre.

Authors:  Maria Azevedo Silva; Carina Leal; André Ruge; Alexandra Fernandes; Liliana Eliseu; Helena Vasconcelos
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-09-06

Review 8.  Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments.

Authors:  Franz Ludwig Dumoulin; Ralf Hildenbrand
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Clinical and financial impacts of introducing an endoscopic mucosal resection service for treatment of patients with large colonic polyps into a regional tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Thomas Worland; Oliver Cronin; Benjamin Harrison; Linda Alexander; Nik Ding; Alvin Ting; Stephanie Dimopoulos; Racheal Sykes; Sina Alexander
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-10-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.