| Literature DB >> 26981000 |
Shuling He1, Kentian Zhao2, Lingfa Ma3, Jingjun Yang3, Yuwei Chang3, Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf4.
Abstract
To discuss the cold resistance performance of different Herba Rhodiolae and successfully transplant Herba Rhodiolae to the Gansu plateau area for nursing, domestication and planting, this paper systematically studies six physiological and biochemical features of Rhodiola kirilowii, Rhodiola algida, Rhodiola crenulata and Herba Rhodiolae that are closely associated with cold resistance features and concludes with the cold resistance capability of Rhodiola kirilowii. In the selected six main indexes of the Herba Rhodiolae, the POD, SOD and CAT activity and MDA and Pro content in the leaf are the main physiological and biochemical indexes to indicate the cold resistance performance of four Herba Rhodiolae seedlings and can be regarded as the preliminary indexes to assess the winter performance of Herba Rhodiolae. The research work will provide the theoretical basis for the wild variants of Herba Rhodiolae and GAPJ base construction.Entities:
Keywords: Cold resistance; Comprehensive evaluation; Herba Rhodiolae; Physiological and biochemical index
Year: 2015 PMID: 26981000 PMCID: PMC4778585 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.10.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Trends of relative electric conductivity on cell membrane permeability of Herba Rhodiolae leaves.
Figure 2Influence of low-temperature threat on cell membrane permeability of Herba Rhodiolae leaves.
Figure 3Influence of low-temperature threat on POD activity of Herba Rhodiolae leaves.
Figure 4Influence of low-temperature threat on SOD activity of Herba Rhodiolae leaves.
Figure 5Influence of low-temperature threat on CAT activity t of Herba Rhodiolae leaves.
Figure 6Influence of low-temperature threat on MDA content of Herba Rhodiolae leaves.
PCA analysis of 6 physiological and biochemical indexes affecting cold resistance of Herba Rhodiolae.
| Index | Type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index sorting | |||||
| Electric conductivity (%) | −0.7876 | −0.7969 | −0.8562 | −0.8328 | 6 |
| Proline content /(mg/g) | −0.1361 | −0.1444 | −0.0863 | −0.1358 | 5 |
| POD activity (U/g FW) | 2.0762 | 1.924 | 1.8815 | 1.9986 | 2 |
| SOD activity (U/g FW) | 1.2345 | 1.418 | 1.4493 | 1.3309 | 1 |
| CAT activity (U/g FW) | −0.3745 | −0.4294 | −0.1812 | −0.1347 | 4 |
| MDA content (mmol/g FW) | −0.4488 | −0.4982 | −0.4319 | −0.4025 | 3 |
| Type sorting | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |