Literature DB >> 26980600

Identification of independent risk factors for flap failure: A retrospective analysis of 1530 free flaps for breast, head and neck and extremity reconstruction.

David E Las1, Tim de Jong1, J Michiel Zuidam1, Norbert M Verweij1, Steven E R Hovius1, Marc A M Mureau2.   

Abstract

Reconstructive microsurgery is a powerful method of treating various complex defects. However, flap loss remains a possibility, leading to additional surgery, hospitalisation and costs. Consequently, it is important to know which factors lead to an increased risk of flap failure, so that measures can be undertaken to reduce this risk. Therefore, we analysed our results over a 20-year period to identify risk factors for flap failure after breast, head and neck and extremity reconstruction. The medical files of all patients treated between 1992 and 2012 were reviewed. Patient characteristics, surgical data and post-operative complications were scored, and independent risk factors for flap loss were identified. Reconstruction with a total of 1530 free flaps was performed in 1247 patients. Partial and total flap loss occurred in 5.5% and 4.4% of all free flaps, respectively. In all flaps, signs of compromised flap circulation were a risk factor for flap failure. More specifically, the risk factors for flap failure in breast reconstruction were previous radiotherapy, venous anastomosis revision, gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flap choice and post-operative bleeding. In head and neck reconstruction, pulmonary co-morbidity and anastomosis to the lingual vein or superficial temporal artery were risk factors, whereas a radial forearm flap reduced the risk. In extremity reconstruction, diabetes, prolonged anaesthesia time and post-operative wound infection were risk factors. Independent pre-, intra- and post-operative risk factors for flap failure after microvascular breast, head and neck and extremity reconstruction were identified. These results may be used to improve patient counselling and to adjust treatment algorithms to further reduce the chance of flap failure.
Copyright © 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Extremity; Free flap; Head and neck; Microsurgery; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980600     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  17 in total

1.  Fibula Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Identifying Risk Factors for Flap Failure and Analysis of Postoperative Complications in a Low Volume Setting.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan Verhelst; Flore Dons; Pieter-Jan Van Bever; Joseph Schoenaers; Lloyd Nanhekhan; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-06-05

2.  Quality of life after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck in patients with or without postoperative complications.

Authors:  Sanna Lahtinen; Petri Koivunen; Tero Ala-Kokko; Päivi Laurila; Outi Kaarela; Janne H Liisanantti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Pectus excavatum repair from a plastic surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Anton H Schwabegger
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-09

4.  Peri-operative risk factors for complications of free flaps in traumatic wounds - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi; Renan Lyuji Takemura; Gustavo Bersani Silva; Jairo Andre de Oliveira Alves; Luciano Ruiz Torres; Alvaro Baik Cho; Teng Hsiang Wei; Marcelo Rosa de Rezende; Rames Mattar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Risk Factors of Free Flap Complications in Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiko Suyama; Shunjiro Yagi; Kohei Fukuoka; Maki Morita; Aya Kinjo; Takahiro Fukuhara; Kazunori Fujiwara; Isamu Kodani; Yoneatsu Osaki
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.371

Review 6.  [Plastic reconstruction of radiation injuries].

Authors:  P M Vogt; T R Mett; C Henkenberens; C Radtke; R Ipaktchi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Heme oxygenase‑1 improves the survival of ischemic skin flaps (Review).

Authors:  Yinhua Zheng; Zhenlan Li; Min Yin; Xu Gong
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.952

8.  High-Risk Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of 108,303 Cases From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP).

Authors:  Melissa Wan; Jacques X Zhang; Yichuan Ding; Yiwen Jin; Julie Bedford; Mahesh Nagarajan; Marija Bucevska; Douglas J Courtemanche; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 9.  Perioperative management of open fractures in the lower limb.

Authors:  Bryan Loh; Jiang An Lim; Matthew Seah; Wasim Khan
Journal:  J Perioper Pract       Date:  2021-07-02

10.  NSQIP as a Predictor of Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Free Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles A Riley; Blair M Barton; Claire M Lawlor; David Z Cai; Phoebe E Riley; Edward D McCoul; Christian P Hasney; Brian A Moore
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2017-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.