Literature DB >> 26980549

Improving PEEK bioactivity for craniofacial reconstruction using a 3D printed scaffold embedded with mesenchymal stem cells.

Michael Roskies1, Jack O Jordan2, Dongdong Fang2, Mohamed-Nur Abdallah3, Michael P Hier4, Alex Mlynarek4, Faleh Tamimi3, Simon D Tran5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a bioinert thermoplastic that has been investigated for its potential use in craniofacial reconstruction; however, its use in clinical practice is limited by a poor integration with adjacent bone upon implantation. To improve the bone-implant interface, two strategies have been employed: to modify its surface or to impregnate PEEK with bioactive materials. This study attempts to combine and improve upon the two approaches by modifying the internal structure into a trabecular network and to impregnate PEEK with mesenchymal stem cells. Furthermore, we compare the newly designed PEEK scaffolds' interactions with both bone-derived (BMSC) and adipose (ADSC) stem cells.
DESIGN: Customized PEEK scaffolds were designed to incorporate a trabecular microstructure using a computer-aided design program and then printed via selective laser sintering (SLS), a 3D-printing process with exceptional accuracy. The scaffold structure was evaluated using microCT. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate scaffold morphology with and without mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Adipose and bone marrow mesenchymal cells were isolated from rats and cultured on scaffolds. Cell proliferation and differentiation were assessed using alamarBlue and alkaline phosphatase assays, respectively. Cell morphology after one week of co-culturing cells with PEEK scaffolds was evaluated using SEM.
RESULTS: SLS 3D printing fabricated scaffolds with a porosity of 36.38% ± 6.66 and density of 1.309 g/cm(2). Cell morphology resembled viable fibroblasts attaching to the surface and micropores of the scaffold. PEEK scaffolds maintained the viability of both ADSCs and BMSCs; however, ADSCs demonstrated higher osteodifferentiation than BMSCs (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that SLS 3D printing can be used to fabricate customized porous PEEK scaffolds that maintain the viability of adipose and bone marrow-derived MSCs and induce the osteodifferentiation of the adipose-derived MSCs. The combination of 3D printed PEEK scaffolds with MSCs could overcome some of the limitations using PEEK biopolymers for load-bearing bone regeneration in craniofacial reconstruction.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEEK; Tissue engineering; bone regeneration; craniofacial reconstruction; selective laser sintering; stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980549     DOI: 10.1177/0885328216638636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Appl        ISSN: 0885-3282            Impact factor:   2.646


  20 in total

Review 1.  Rapid prototyping technology and its application in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Bo Yuan; Sheng-Yuan Zhou; Xiong-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Apr.       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices.

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; David L Safranski; J Kenneth Burkus; James L Chappuis; Christopher S D Lee; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall; Kathryn E Smith
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 4.  3D printing in cell culture systems and medical applications.

Authors:  Max J Lerman; Josephine Lembong; Greg Gillen; John P Fisher
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

Review 5.  3D bioprinting and craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-14

Review 6.  Modification of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) physical features to improve osteointegration.

Authors:  Dan Yu; Xiaoyue Lei; Huiyong Zhu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 7.  Laser Sintering Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeremy N DiNoro; Naomi C Paxton; Jacob Skewes; Zhilian Yue; Philip M Lewis; Robert G Thompson; Stephen Beirne; Maria A Woodruff; Gordon G Wallace
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 8.  From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures.

Authors:  Nihal Engin Vrana; Sharda Gupta; Kunal Mitra; Albert A Rizvanov; Valeriya V Solovyeva; Ezgi Antmen; Majid Salehi; Arian Ehterami; Lea Pourchet; Julien Barthes; Christophe A Marquette; Magnus von Unge; Chi-Yun Wang; Po-Liang Lai; Arindam Bit
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 1.752

9.  3D printed hyperelastic "bone" scaffolds and regional gene therapy: A novel approach to bone healing.

Authors:  Ram Alluri; Adam Jakus; Sofia Bougioukli; William Pannell; Osamu Sugiyama; Amy Tang; Ramille Shah; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  A Perioperative Paradigm of Cranioplasty With Polyetheretherketone: Comprehensive Management for Preventing Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Zhenghui He; Yuxiao Ma; Chun Yang; Jiyuan Hui; Qing Mao; Guoyi Gao; Jiyao Jiang; Junfeng Feng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.