Literature DB >> 26980091

Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Massimiliano Bissolati1, Elena Orsenigo2, Carlo Staudacher2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was initially used for the treatment of colorectal benign disease. However, the indications for MIS techniques have progressively been expanded to include cancers. Nowadays, the indications for MIS are almost the same as those for open surgery. The scientific validation of MIS for colorectal cancer has favorably evolved. The advantages awaited for the short-term outcome were confirmed, although at the cost of longer operating time and higher costs. In parallel, tangible evidence of oncologic safety was demonstrated, and long-term results of MIS have been found comparable to those of open surgery. In the current state of MIS short-term superiority and log-term equality, less surgical injury, lower immune function depression and better postoperative outcome make MIS particularly suitable for delicate and difficult patients, such as elderly or obese; on the contrary, the lower costs have led to still consider open surgery as a valid alternative for low-impact resections (such as right colectomy). The continuous development in the field of MIS has recently led to the introduction of the single-port (SILS) and natural-orifice (NOTES) techniques, which allow better esthetic results, even if the their validation has not yet reached scientific evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonic cancer; Colorectal cancer; Evidence-based medicine; Laparoscopic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980091     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0350-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  50 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Lupeng Wu; Xiudong Li; Xiurong Wu; Bin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  M A Shahir; V E P P Lemmens; L V van de Poll-Franse; A C Voogd; H Martijn; M L G Janssen-Heijnen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients.

Authors:  Matteo Frasson; Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Trends in the management and survival of digestive tract cancers among patients aged over 80 years.

Authors:  A M Bouvier; G Launoy; C Lepage; J Faivre
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 6.  Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; C Listorti; D Cavaliere; N Avenia; N Gullà; G Giustozzi; F Sciannameo; G Noya; C Boselli
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Rectal cancer surgery in patients more than 80 years of age.

Authors:  Alain Barrier; Leonardo Ferro; Sidney Houry; François Lacaine; Michel Huguier
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Expert opinion on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer parallels evidence from a cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guillaume Martel; Alyson Crawford; Jeffrey S Barkun; Robin P Boushey; Craig R Ramsay; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rectal cancer treatment and outcome in the elderly: an audit based on the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 1995-2004.

Authors:  Bärbel Jung; Lars Påhlman; Robert Johansson; Erik Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of radiofrequency energy on intraoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in obese patients.

Authors:  Diletta Cassini; Michelangelo Miccini; Matteo Gregori; Farshad Manoochehri; Gianandrea Baldazzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 2.  Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Sciuto; Giovanni Merola; Giovanni D De Palma; Maurizio Sodo; Felice Pirozzi; Umberto M Bracale; Umberto Bracale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Laparoscopic Radical Resection versus Routine Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Dong Xi; Qiutao Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Masakazu Sato; Minako Koizumi; Kei Inaba; Yu Takahashi; Natsuki Nagashima; Hiroshi Ki; Nao Itaoka; Chiharu Ueshima; Maki Nakata; Yoko Hasumi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-12-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.