Patrick Flanigan1, Varun R Kshettry2, Jeffrey P Mullin2, Arman Jahangiri3, Pablo F Recinos4. 1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 2. Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, California Center for Pituitary Disorders, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 4. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Section of Rhinology, Sinus, and Skull Base Surgery, Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: recinop@ccf.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of frontal sinus morphometry is important in bifrontal, pterional, orbitozygomatic, and supraorbital craniotomies. Inadvertent frontal sinus violation can lead to infection, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, and mucocele formation. In particular, knowledge of anatomy in relation to surgically relevant landmarks can help surgeons perform these procedures more precisely and safely. We performed a descriptive radiographic analysis to better understand variations in frontal sinus anatomy. METHODS: Using 3-dimensional reconstructive software, we analyzed 162 normal cranial computerized tomographic angiograms (from 80 men and 82 women). A line between the supraorbital notches (SONs) was used as a horizontal reference line (HRL). We recorded the maximum sinus height and width from the HRL and midline, respectively. In addition, sinus width was measured in relation to the SON at 0, 1, and 2 cm above the HRL. RESULTS: The mean maximal sinus height from the HRL was 1.8 cm. The mean maximum sinus width was 2.6 cm (right and left) from midline and 0.46 cm (right) and 0.49 cm (left) from the SON. Less than 11% of sinuses were lateral to the SON at 2.0 cm above the HRL and <6% of sinuses were >1.5 cm lateral to the SON at 1.0 cm above the HRL. CONCLUSIONS: Planned surgical corridors >1.5 cm lateral to the SON and/or >3.0 cm above the HRL are most likely to avoid the frontal sinus based on our radiographic measurements of normal sinus anatomy. Careful radiographic study and appropriate planning for more medial and/or inferior corridors is suggested.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of frontal sinus morphometry is important in bifrontal, pterional, orbitozygomatic, and supraorbital craniotomies. Inadvertent frontal sinus violation can lead to infection, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, and mucocele formation. In particular, knowledge of anatomy in relation to surgically relevant landmarks can help surgeons perform these procedures more precisely and safely. We performed a descriptive radiographic analysis to better understand variations in frontal sinus anatomy. METHODS: Using 3-dimensional reconstructive software, we analyzed 162 normal cranial computerized tomographic angiograms (from 80 men and 82 women). A line between the supraorbital notches (SONs) was used as a horizontal reference line (HRL). We recorded the maximum sinus height and width from the HRL and midline, respectively. In addition, sinus width was measured in relation to the SON at 0, 1, and 2 cm above the HRL. RESULTS: The mean maximal sinus height from the HRL was 1.8 cm. The mean maximum sinus width was 2.6 cm (right and left) from midline and 0.46 cm (right) and 0.49 cm (left) from the SON. Less than 11% of sinuses were lateral to the SON at 2.0 cm above the HRL and <6% of sinuses were >1.5 cm lateral to the SON at 1.0 cm above the HRL. CONCLUSIONS: Planned surgical corridors >1.5 cm lateral to the SON and/or >3.0 cm above the HRL are most likely to avoid the frontal sinus based on our radiographic measurements of normal sinus anatomy. Careful radiographic study and appropriate planning for more medial and/or inferior corridors is suggested.
Authors: Sergio García-García; José Juan González-Sánchez; Sofia Kakaizada; Michael T Lawton; Arnau Benet Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 2.703