Literature DB >> 26979765

Knee Extensor Strength and Gait Characteristics After Minimally Invasive Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Matthias Braito1, Johannes M Giesinger2, Stefan Fischler1, Arnold Koller3, David Niederseer4, Michael C Liebensteiner1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In light of the existing lack of evidence, it was the aim of this study to compare gait characteristics and knee extensor strength after medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (MUKA) with those after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), given the same standardized minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach in both groups.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for MIS-MUKA or MIS-TKA as part of clinical routine were invited to participate. A posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee design was used for all MIS-TKA. A 3-dimensional gait analysis was performed preoperatively with a VICON system and at 8 weeks postoperative to determine temporospatial parameters, ground reaction forces, joint angles, and joint moments. At the same 2 times, isokinetic tests were performed to obtain peak values of knee extensor torque. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted and included the main effects time (before and after surgery) and surgical group and the group-by-time interaction effect.
RESULTS: Fifteen MIS-MUKA patients and 17 MIS-TKA patients were eligible for the final analysis. The groups showed no differences regarding age, body mass index, sex, side treated, or stage of osteoarthritis. We determined neither intergroup differences nor time × group interactions for peak knee extensor torque or any gait parameters (temporospatial, ground reaction forces, joint angles, and joint moments).
CONCLUSION: It is concluded that MUKA is not superior to TKA with regard to knee extensor strength or 3-dimensional gait characteristics at 8 weeks after operation. As gait characteristics and knee extensor strength are only 2 of the various potential outcome parameters (knee scores, activity scores…) and quadriceps strength might take a longer time to recover, our findings should be interpreted with caution.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gait analysis; minimally invasive surgery; partial knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental; unicondylar

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26979765     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Kohei Nishizawa; Kengo Harato; Yutaro Morishige; Shu Kobayashi; Yasuo Niki; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-09-01

2.  Alterations of kinematics in knees after single versus multiple radius femoral prostheses total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mengyuan Li; Guangtao Fu; Wenhan Huang; Bofu Lin; Ruiying Zhang; Yu Zhang; Yuanchen Ma; Qiujian Zheng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  [Analysis of gait and effectiveness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Peng Hao; Liu Yang; Rui He; Hao Chen; Maolin Sun; Shuainan Liang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15

4.  Gait comparison of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty during level walking.

Authors:  Kyung-Wook Nha; Oog-Jin Shon; Byung-Sic Kong; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Novel Method to Estimate the Full Knee Joint Kinematics Using Low Cost IMU Sensors for Easy to Implement Low Cost Diagnostics.

Authors:  Mark Versteyhe; Henri De Vroey; Frederik Debrouwere; Hans Hallez; Kurt Claeys
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.