| Literature DB >> 26978567 |
Evan John1, Francisco Lopez-Ruiz1, Kasia Rybak1, Carl J Mousley2, Richard P Oliver1, Kar-Chun Tan1.
Abstract
The HOG1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is activated through two-component histidine kinase (HK) signalling. This pathway was first characterized in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a regulator of osmotolerance. The fungus Parastagonospora nodorum is the causal agent of septoria nodorum blotch of wheat. This pathogen uses host-specific effectors in tandem with general pathogenicity mechanisms to carry out its infection process. Genes showing strong sequence homology to S. cerevisiae HOG1 signalling pathway genes have been identified in the genome of P. nodorum. In this study, we examined the role of the pathway in the virulence of P. nodorum on wheat by disrupting putative pathway component genes: HOG1 (SNOG_13296) MAPK and NIK1 (SNOG_11631) hybrid HK. Mutants deleted in NIK1 and HOG1 were insensitive to dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole fungicides, but not a fungicide that targets ergosterol biosynthesis. Furthermore, both Δnik1 and Δhog1 mutants showed increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress. However, HOG1, but not NIK1, is required for tolerance to elevated temperatures. HOG1 deletion conferred increased tolerance to 6-methoxy-2-benzoxazolinone, a cereal phytoalexin. This suggests that the HOG1 signalling pathway is not exclusively associated with NIK1. Both Δnik1 and Δhog1 mutants retained the ability to infect and cause necrotic lesions on wheat. However, we observed that the Δhog1 mutation resulted in reduced production of pycnidia, asexual fruiting bodies that facilitate spore dispersal during late infection. Our study demonstrated the overlapping and distinct roles of a HOG1 MAPK and two-component HK signalling in P. nodorum growth and pathogenicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26978567 PMCID: PMC5042077 DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiology ISSN: 1350-0872 Impact factor: 2.777
Characterised functions of putative HK/Hog1 MAPK pathway components in various fungal phytopathogens
| AaHSK1 | Group III HK | Δaahog1: non-pathogenic (not Δaahsk1) |
| |
| AaHOG1 | Hog1 MAPK | |||
| AbNIK1 | Group III HK | Reduced virulence; increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress |
| |
| AlHK1 | Group III HK | Increased virulence; increased resistance to dimethachlon and phenylpyrrole; |
| |
| SRM1 | Hog1 MAPK | Increased sensitivity to oxidative/UV/hyperosmotic stresses; moderate resistance to dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole; positive regulator of melanin biosynthetic genes |
| |
| BcSak1 | Hog1 MAPK | Δbcsak1: reduced phytotoxin production |
| |
| BcOS4 | Ssk2 MAPKKK | |||
| Bos1 | Group III HK | |||
| Ssk1 | RR | Δssk1: decreased conidiation |
| |
| Skn7 | RR | |||
| Hog1 | Hog1 MAPK | |||
| Dic1 | Group III HK | |||
| OSC1 | Hog1 MAPK | Increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress; increased resistance to phenylpyrrole |
| |
| CpMK1 | Hog1 MAPK | Increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress; |
| |
| FgOS2 | Hog1 MAPK | Δfgos2/Δfghog1/Δfgpbs2/Δfgssk2: increased sensitivity to oxidative and hyperosmotic stresses |
| |
| Fghog1 | Hog1 MAPK | |||
| Fgpbs2 | Pbs2 MAPKK | |||
| Fgssk2 | Ssk2 MAPKKK | |||
| Fhk1 | Group III HK | Increased resistance to dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole; increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic and oxidative stresses; reduced virulence |
| |
| Fphog1 | Hog1 MAPK | Increased resistance to phenylpyrrole; increased sensitivity to oxidative, heat, UV and hyperosmotic stresses |
| |
| Ssk1 | RR | Increased sensitivity to oxidative stress; increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress; decreased conidiation; decreased virulence; hydrophillic; delayed ascospore release |
| |
| Hog1 | Hog1 MAPK | |||
| OSM1 | Hog1 MAPK | Δosm1: reduction in arabitol content |
| |
| HIK1 | Group III HK | |||
| MoSLN1 | Group VI HK | |||
| MoSSK1 | RR | |||
| MgHog1 | Hog1 MAPK | Unable to form filamentous growth/non-pathogenic; impaired pigmentation; increased resistance to dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole; increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic stress |
| |
| Shk1 | Group III HK | Increased resistance to dicarboximide and phenylpyrrole; increased sensitivity to hyperosmotic and oxidative stresses; altered vegetative growth and unable to produce sclerotia |
|
Fungal strains used in this study
| SN15 | Wild-type | |
| Ect | Ectopic transformant (BLE ectopic integration) | This study |
| Δnik1.18 | SN15 deleted in SNOG_11631 (NIK1) | This study |
| Δnik1.36 | SN15 deleted in SNOG_11631 (NIK1) | This study |
| Δhog1.20 | SN15 deleted in SNOG_13296 (HOG1) | This study |
| Δhog1.29 | SN15 deleted in SNOG_13296 (HOG1) | This study |
| Δnik1 :: NIK1 | Δnik1.18 complemented with SNOG_11631 (NIK1) | This study |
| Δhog1 :: HOG1 | Δhog1.20 complemented with SNOG_13296 (HOG1) | This study |
Fig. 2.Growth of all strains at elevated temperatures. (a) Colony morphology and (b) pycnidia development were examined.
Fig. 1.HOG1 and NIK1 are required for osmotolerance. Net optical density was determined following 6 days growth in MM broth supplemented with different NaCl concentrations using a 96-well plate assay as described by Lowe . The experiment was performed in four biological replicates. The error bars show sems. ANOVA using the Tukey–Kramer test set at a significance threshold of P<0.05 was used to compare all measurements at each NaCl treatment. When indicated by the same number of asterisks above the bars, the mean was not found to be significantly different between strains in each treatment.
EC50 (μg ml−1) and RF values of the fungicide tolerance assay
| SN15 | 1.84 | 1.00 | 2.06 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.38 | 1.00 |
| Ect | 1.66 | 0.90 | 2.15 | 1.04 | 0.20 | 1.98 | 1.28 | 0.93 |
| Δhog1.20 | 10* | >5.44 | 10* | >4.86 | 5* | >48.77 | 1.66 | 1.21 |
| Δnik1.18 | 10* | >5.44 | 10* | >4.86 | 5* | >48.77 | 2.07 | 1.50 |
| Δhog1 :: HOG1 | 1.41 | 0.76 | 1.55 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.74 | – | – |
| Δnik1 :: NIK1 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.05 | – | – |
*EC50 is greater than the measurable concentration used; therefore, the highest concentration of fungicide tested was used for RF calculation.
The microtitre growth curves used for calculation.
Fig. 3.Growth of all strains on MBOA. (a) Colony diameter was determined from 9 days growth on MM agar supplemented with different MBOA concentrations. The experiment was performed in biological triplicates. ANOVA using the Tukey–Kramer test set at a stringent significance threshold of P<0.0005 was used to compare the radial growth of all strains. The error bars show sems. When indicated by the same number of asterisks above the bars, the mean was not found to be significantly different between strains in each treatment. (b) Colony morphology of all strains grown on 3.0 mM MBOA.
Fig. 4.In vitro sporulation assay on V8-PDA. ANOVA using the Tukey–Kramer test set at a significance threshold of P<0.05 was used to compare sporulation of all strains. The error bars show sems. When indicated by the same number of asterisks above the bars, the mean was not found to be significantly different between strains.
Fig. 5.The expression profile of NIK1 and HOG1 in planta. The error bars show sems. The experiment was performed in biological triplicates.
Fig. 6.Wheat infection assay at 22 °C. (a) Necrotic lesions caused by SN15, Ect, Δnik1 and Δhog1 mutants. Gelatin was used as a non-infection treatment. (b) Pycnidia were allowed to develop on a detached leaf assay. Arrowheads indicate pycnidia.