Leanne R De Souza1,2, Howard Berger1,3, Ravi Retnakaran4, Paraskevi A Vlachou5, Jonathon L Maguire3, Avery B Nathens6, Philip W Connelly3,7, Joel G Ray1,2,3,7,8. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Medical Imaging, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. Department of Health Policy Management Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is mediated by insulin resistance, as is gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). NAFLD has not been studied in relation to GDM. The objective of this study was to assess the association between first-trimester sonographic findings of NAFLD, and both dysglycemia and GDM in mid-pregnancy. METHODS: We followed a prospective cohort design at a large obstetrics clinic in Toronto, Ontario with 476 women enrolled in early pregnancy. NAFLD was assessed by ultrasound at 11-14 weeks gestation, and standardized images were independently scored by two ultrasonographers for the presence of hepatorenal contrast (one finding) and/or blurring of the intrahepatic vessels (one finding), relative to neither being present. Logistic regression analysis was used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relation between 0, 1, or 2 sonographic findings of NAFLD and the composite outcome of impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or GDM at 24-28 weeks gestation, determined by a fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. ORs were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, ethnicity, first-degree relative with type 2 DM, body mass index (BMI) at 11-14 weeks gestation, and change in BMI from 11-14 to 24-28 weeks gestation. RESULTS: Fifty out of 476 women (10.5%) developed the composite outcome. The presence of 1 (aOR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.1) or 2 (aOR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.0-18.4) sonographic features of NAFLD predicted the composite outcome. Limiting the analysis to ≥1 feature vs. none, the aOR was 2.2 (95% CI: 1.1-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic assessment of NAFLD is a semiquantitative measure, with limited ability to detect small amounts of hepatic steatosis, or to distinguish various stages of NAFLD. First-trimester sonographic evidence of NAFLD predicts dysglycemia in mid-pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is mediated by insulin resistance, as is gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). NAFLD has not been studied in relation to GDM. The objective of this study was to assess the association between first-trimester sonographic findings of NAFLD, and both dysglycemia and GDM in mid-pregnancy. METHODS: We followed a prospective cohort design at a large obstetrics clinic in Toronto, Ontario with 476 women enrolled in early pregnancy. NAFLD was assessed by ultrasound at 11-14 weeks gestation, and standardized images were independently scored by two ultrasonographers for the presence of hepatorenal contrast (one finding) and/or blurring of the intrahepatic vessels (one finding), relative to neither being present. Logistic regression analysis was used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the relation between 0, 1, or 2 sonographic findings of NAFLD and the composite outcome of impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or GDM at 24-28 weeks gestation, determined by a fasting 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. ORs were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, ethnicity, first-degree relative with type 2 DM, body mass index (BMI) at 11-14 weeks gestation, and change in BMI from 11-14 to 24-28 weeks gestation. RESULTS: Fifty out of 476 women (10.5%) developed the composite outcome. The presence of 1 (aOR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.1) or 2 (aOR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.0-18.4) sonographic features of NAFLD predicted the composite outcome. Limiting the analysis to ≥1 feature vs. none, the aOR was 2.2 (95% CI: 1.1-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic assessment of NAFLD is a semiquantitative measure, with limited ability to detect small amounts of hepatic steatosis, or to distinguish various stages of NAFLD. First-trimester sonographic evidence of NAFLD predicts dysglycemia in mid-pregnancy.
Authors: Stefanie N Hinkle; Andrea J Sharma; Shin Y Kim; Sohyun Park; Karen Dalenius; Patricia L Brindley; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2012-10
Authors: Mirja Tiikkainen; Marjo Tamminen; Anna-Maija Häkkinen; Robert Bergholm; Satu Vehkavaara; Juha Halavaara; Kari Teramo; Aila Rissanen; Hannele Yki-Järvinen Journal: Obes Res Date: 2002-09
Authors: Satish C Kalhan; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Arthur J McCullough; Richard W Hanson; David E Kelley Journal: Metabolism Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Neena Modi; Dominika Murgasova; Rikke Ruager-Martin; E Louise Thomas; Matthew J Hyde; Christopher Gale; Shalini Santhakumaran; Caroline J Doré; Afshin Alavi; Jimmy D Bell Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Sneha B Sridhar; Fei Xu; Jeanne Darbinian; Charles P Quesenberry; Assiamira Ferrara; Monique M Hedderson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Seung Mi Lee; Soo Heon Kwak; Ja Nam Koo; Ig Hwan Oh; Jeong Eun Kwon; Byoung Jae Kim; Sun Min Kim; Sang Youn Kim; Gyoung Min Kim; Sae Kyung Joo; Bo Kyung Koo; Sue Shin; Chanthalakeo Vixay; Errol R Norwitz; Chan-Wook Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Won Kim; Joong Shin Park Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Seung Mi Lee; Joong Shin Park; You Jung Han; Won Kim; Seung Hyun Bang; Byoung Jae Kim; Chan Wook Park; Moon Young Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Sadia Mehmood; Myles Margolis; Chang Ye; Louise Maple-Brown; Anthony J Hanley; Philip W Connelly; Mathew Sermer; Bernard Zinman; Ravi Retnakaran Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2018-09-08
Authors: Kenneth Hodson; Chiara Dalla Man; Fiona E Smith; Alison Barnes; Catherine McParlin; Claudio Cobelli; Stephen C Robson; Vera Araújo-Soares; Roy Taylor Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Rasika Pradeep Herath; Shirom R Siriwardana; Chanil D Ekanayake; Vikum Abeysekara; Sajith U A Kodithuwakku; Himali P Herath Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240