Literature DB >> 26977428

Dataset for human sensitivity to chemicals during development of motor function.

Susan Z Ingber1, Hana R Pohl1.   

Abstract

The authors reviewed human data related to motor development following exposure to a subset of chemicals thoroughly reviewed in Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Toxicological Profiles and Addenda. The resulting dataset includes the following variables and confounders: chemical name, exposure route, exposure duration and frequency, study design, cohort name and/or geographic location, sex of cohort subjects, NOAEL, and LOAEL. This data summary can help validate motor development outcomes observed in animal exposure studies; it can also aid in determining whether these outcomes and corresponding exposure windows are relevant to humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental effects; Human exposure effects; Motor function; Windows of sensitivity; in utero exposure effects

Year:  2016        PMID: 26977428      PMCID: PMC4773568          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data The human epidemiological data provide researchers with a condensed reference of chemicals for which motor development effects have been observed and at which doses and exposure durations. They can be compared to animal data to help assess relevance to humans. They provide a list of chemicals for which researchers can design much-needed acute duration studies on motor development effects known to occur in humans.

Data

Table 1 presents motor development outcome and study design data extracted from epidemiological studies of chemicals reviewed in ATSDR’s Toxicological Profiles and Addenda. The data include: No Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAELs) and/or Lowest Observed Adverse Effect levels (LOAELs), exposure routes and durations assessed, cohort name and demographics [geographic location, sex(es)], and study design type. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profiles (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/index.asp), NCBI’s PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed).
Table 1

Summary of human NOAEL & LOAEL data for motor development outcomes.

ChemicalSex of offspringCohort (location)Study designExposure duration/frequencyNOAEL (mg/kg/d)LOAEL (mg/kg/d)Reference

Motor activity
EthanolM & FBirth Cohort (Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia)Prospective cohortGestation (entirety or first two trimesters)Not established12 oz/week×entire gestation period, 14 oz/week×first and second trimesters (reduced motor maturity, increased activity)[13]
DDEM & FBirth Cohort (Flix, Spain)Prospective cohortGestationNot establishedDelay in psychomotor development observed at 13 months age; decreased locomotor performance on the Griffiths Mental Development Scales[34]
ΣPBDEsM & FMenorca birth cohort/INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente [Environment and Childhood]) project (Spain)Prospective cohortGestation (cord blood) and postnatal (4 years age)2.10(16.8) ng/mL (Median(max)) cord blood; 0.12(130.2) ng/mL serum at age 4 (hyperactivity via ADHD criteria of DSM-IV)[23]



Motor function
ArsenicM & FMaternal and Infant Nutritional Intervention at Matlab (MINIMat) study (Matlab, Bangladesh)Community-based randomized trial8 or 30 weeks gestation81 (37–207) μg/L at 8 weeks of gestation; 84 μg/L (42–230 μg/L) at 30 weeks (PDI score)[43]
ArsenicM & FChildren from Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS) (Araihazar, Bangladesh)Cross-sectionalPost-natal (8–11 years age; drinking water levels; blood levels)Not establishedMean 6.3 μg/L in blood (decreased motor function – including motor coordination – via Bruininks–Oseretsky test)[33]
Carbon monoxideM & FBirth Cohort (San Marcos, Guatemala)Prospective cohortGestation, postnatal inhalationExposure during the first 9 postnatal months (fine motor function via Reitan-Indiana Finger tapping test, WRAVMA Pegboard test, and Bender-Gestalt-II connect the dots motor test); mean 3.8 ppm (fine motor function as measured by WRAVMA and Bender Gestalt-II tests)Mean 3.8 ppm, range 0.62–12.52 ppm (decreased fine motor speed via Reitan-Indiana Finger tapping test: −5.7 (−9.7, −1.7)) with increasing maternal third trimester exposure level at age 6–7 years[16]
ChlordeconeM & FTimoun mother– child cohort (Guadaloupe)Prospective cohortGestationMedian (range) <0.24 (0.07–3.91) μg/L F (fine motor function via Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) score converted to IQ score); M & F (gross motor function)0.24 μg/L M (impaired fine motor function via converted ASQ score)[12]
ChlordeconeM & FTimoun mother– child cohort (Guadaloupe)Prospective cohortGestation+lactation (breast milk sample measured when infant reached 3 months age)Median (range) 0.62 (0.2–4.2) μg/L M & F (fine and gross motor function (Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) score converted to IQ score))[12]
Chlorodibenzofurans (CDFs)M & FYu-Cheng rice oil contamination victims (Taiwan)Field survey (retrospective)GestationNot establishedDecreased PDI score[37]
Total CDDs/CDFs+PCBsM & FDuisburg Birth Cohort Study (Germany)Prospective cohortGestationMean (range) 18.8 (4.0–51.2) pg/g blood lipids TEQs (motor development (PDI) assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (at ages 12 and 24 months))[45]
DDEM & FBirth Cohort (Flix, Spain)Prospective cohortGestationNot establishedDelay in psychomotor development observed at 13 months age; decreased locomotor performance on the Griffiths Mental Development Scales[34]
DDT, DDEM & FCenter for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas study (Salinas Valley, California)Prospective cohortGestationNot establishedA decrease of ~2 points in the psychomotor developmental index score (PDI) with each 10-fold increase in maternal p,p′-DDT blood serum levels (geometric mean (95% CI): 22.0 (18.4–26.4) ng/g lipid) when the children reached 6 and 12 months of age (but not at 24 months) and maternal p,p′-DDE levels (geometric mean (95% CI): 1436.9 (1257.4–1642.1) ng/g lipid) at 6 months of age only)[21]
DDT, DDE, DDD (except o,p′-isomers)M & FPerinatal Cohort (Morelos, Mexico)Prospective cohortGestation (exposure at each trimester measured)6.8 (2.8) ng/mL (GM (GSD)) 2nd and 7.8 (2.8) (GM(GSD)) 3rd trimester exposure (PDI score at 3, 6 and 12 months age)6.4 (2.8) ng/mL (GM (GSD)) 1st trimester exposure (PDI score at 3, 6 and 12 months age)[44]
DDT, DDE, DDD (except o,p′-isomers)M & FGroningen infant COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure-Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) studyProspective cohortGestation (35 weeks)Not establishedImproved coordination (via Touwen’s neurologic examination)[41]
EthanolM & FBirth Cohort (Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia)Prospective cohortGestation (entirety or first two trimesters)Not established12 oz/week×entire gestation period, 14 oz/week×first and second trimesters (reduced motor maturity, increased activity)[13]
EthanolM & FPregnant women seeking prenatal care (U.S.)Prospective cohortGestation (exposure measured at 5 months gestation)Not established≥.5 oz per day in early pregnancy (approximately 1 drink per day) decreased fine motor skill performance on the Wisconsin Fine Motor Steadiness Battery at 4 years age;[2]
Decreased gross motor performance (includes motor coordination) on a battery adapted from the Gross Motor Scale developed by Crippled Chidren’s Division of the University of Oregon Medical School
Heptachlor epoxideM & FOahu high school students exposed during gestation (Oahu)RetrospectiveGestationNot establishedImpaired motor planning at high school age[1]
LeadM & FCincinnati Lead Study, Birth Cohort (Cincinnati, Ohio)Prospective cohortGestation (first trimester, gestation+10 days (neonatal), gestation through age 6 (current level))8.4 μg/dL (prenatal) (fine motor function)Mean 4.8 (neonatal) and 10.1 μg/dL (current level)(decreased fine motor function) (Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP));[15]
10.1 μg/dL (current level) (decreased motor coordination as per bilateral coordination subtest of BOTMP at age 6)
LeadM & FBirth Cohort (Cleveland, OH)Prospective cohortGestation (cord blood measured on day of delivery)Not establishedMean 5.8 (range, 2.6–14.7) μg/dL cord blood (neurological soft signs in newborn infants)[17], [19], [18]
LeadM & FBirth Cohort (Cleveland, OH)Prospective cohortGestation (maternal blood level measured on day of delivery)Not establishedMean 6.5 (range, 2.7–11.8) μg/dL pre-natal maternal blood (altered Psychomotor Developmental Index)[18]
LeadM & FMiddle- and upper-class children (Boston, Massachusetts)Prospective cohort10 years (from birth)Mean 7 μg/dL PbB at 24 months (Psychomotor Developmental Index)[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]
ManganeseM & FMexican children (Chiconcoac and Tolago, Mexico)Cross-sectionalGestation+post-natal (lifetime exposure, elementary school aged)Median 12.6 μg/g in hair (Motor function via finger tapping (Halstead-Reitan battery), grooved pegboard, and Santa Ana (motor coordination) tests); Median 9.5 μg/Lin blood (motor function via groove pegboard and Santa Ana tests)Median 9.5 μg/Lin blood (decreased motor function via finger-tapping test (on-dominant hand only))[25]
ManganeseM & Fpublic school children (Province of Brescia, Italy)Cross-sectionalPost-natal (11–14 years age; soil levels)Not established958 ppm in soil (impairment of motor coordination (Luria–Nebraska test), hand dexterity (Pursuit Aiming));[30]
10.99 μg/L in blood (increased tremor intensity);
0.16 ppm in hair (increased tremor intensity)
ManganeseM & FChildren from Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS) (Araihazar, Bangladesh)Cross-sectionalPost-natal (8–11 years age; drinking water levels; blood levels)Motor function – including motor coordination -- via Bruininks–Oseretsky test[33]
Mercury (organic)MSeychelles Child Development Study (Republic of Seychelles)Prospective cohortIn utero exposureFemale arithmetic mean 6.9 ppm (<3–12 ppm) (performance on the grooved pegboard time for non-dominant hand)Male arithmetic mean 6.9 ppm (<3–12 ppm) (decreased performance on the grooved pegboard time for non-dominant hand)[31]
Mercury (organic)FSeychelles Child Development Study (Republic of Seychelles)Prospective cohortIn utero+post-natal exposure, 107 monthsMean 6.6 ppm (6 months age), 4.8 ppm (66 months age), 6.9 ppm (107 months age); Male (performance on the grooved pegboard time for non-dominant hand)Female mean 6.6 ppm (6 months age), 4.8 ppm (66 months age), 6.9 ppm (107 months age) (decreased performance on grooved Pegboard with the non-dominant hand test)[32]
Mercury (organic)M & FBirth Cohort (Poland)Prospective cohortPrenatal exposure (maternal fish consumption)Geometric mean 0.52 μg/mL maternal blood (MDI & PDI scores)Geometric mean 0.75 μg/L maternal blood (reduced MDI & PDI scores)[27]
Mercury (organic)M & FMother-child pairs exposed during Iraqi poisoning incident (Iraq)Prospective cohort?Prenatal exposure (maternal consumption, measured in hair sample)Not established0.0012 (delayed walking; abnormal motor scores (includes assessment of ataxia, abnormal reflexes, and athetoid movement))[14]
Methyl parathionM & FChildren exposed during illegal spraying (Mississippi and Ohio, USA)Cross-Sectional?Post-natal (6 years age and under when homes sprayed with MP)Integration of motor skills based on Pediatric Environmental Neurobehavioral Test Battery (PENTB)[42]
ΣPBDEsM & FMenorca birth cohort/INMA (INfancia y Medio Ambiente [Environment and Childhood]) project (Spain)Prospective cohortGestation (cord blood) and postnatal (4 years age)2.10(16.8) ng/mL (Median(max)) cord blood; 0.12(130.2) ng/mL serum at age 4 (McCarthy Scales of Children׳s Abilities motor function score)[23]
ΣPBDEsM & FCHAMACOS cohort (Salinas, California)Prospective cohortGestation (maternal blood at 26.7±2.6 weeks gestation or delivery) and postnatal (child serum at age 7 years)Gestation and postnatal levels (Gross motor function via McCarthy Scales of Children׳s Abilities (MSCA)); postnatal levels (motor function via finger tap test, WRAVMA pegboard test, and MSCA gross motor test)Gestational exposure (decreased motor function at ages 5 and 7) via WRAVMA pegboard test (non-dominant hand)[20]
BDE 47M & FGroningen infant COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure-Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) studyProspective cohortGestation (35 weeks)Not establishedImproved coordination (via Touwen’s neurologic examination), but the effect disappeared after correcting for SES, sex, and Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) questionaire results[41]
BDE 100M & FGroningen infant COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure–Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) studyProspective cohortGestation (35 weeks)Not establishedImproved coordination (via Touwen’s neurologic examination), but the effect disappeared after correcting for SES, sex, and Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) questionaire results[41]
BDE 154M & FGroningen infant COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure–Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) studyProspective cohortGestation (35 weeks)Not establishedDecreased fine manipulative abilities (via Touwen’s neurologic examination), but the effect disappeared after correcting for SES, sex, and Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) questionaire results (p<0.1)[41]
HBCDDM & FGroningen infant COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure–Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) studyProspective cohortGestation (35 weeks)Not establishedImproved coordination (via Touwen’s neurologic examination)[41]
Pentachlorophenol (PCP)M & FGroningen infant COMPARE (Comparison of Exposure–Effect Pathways to Improve the Assessment of Human Health Risks of Complex Environmental Mixtures of Organohalogens) studyProspective cohortGestation (35 weeks)Not establishedDecreased coordination (via Touwen’s neurologic examination)[41]
PerfluoroalkylsM & FDanish National Birth Cohort (Denmark)Prospective cohortGestation (maternal plasma)Fine and gross motor function at ages 6 and 18 months (neurological consult)[22]
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)M & FBirth Cohort (North Carolina)Prospective cohortGestation1.8 ppm breast milk (lipid based) (Postnatal exposure to PCBs was not associated with the PDI at 6 or 12 months)Median 9.06 ppb maternal serum; median <4.27 ppb cord serum (At 6 months, the PDI was estimated to decrease 0.96 points for every increase of 1 ppm in PCBs. This would mean a drop of 2.6 points if a child moved from the 5th to the 95th percentile of PCB exposure. At 12 months, the drop was estimated at 1.34 points/ppm)[24], [29], [36], [35], [38], [40], [39]
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)M & FDutch PCB/Dioxin Study (Rotterdam, Denmark)Prospective cohortGestation2.2 ppb maternal plasma, 0.45 ppb cord plasma (PDI at 7 and 18 months age)2.2 ppb maternal plasma, 0.45 ppb cord plasma (decreased PDI at 3 months age)[28]
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)M & FDutch PCB/Dioxin Study (Rotterdam, Denmark)Prospective cohortGestation+2 weeks lactationNot establishedMedian 0.75 ppb child plasma, 0.046 ppb TEQ (decreased PDI at 7 months among infants who were breastfed for longer periods and had higher TEQ scores were associated with postnatal total TEQ exposure)[28]

Experimental design, materials and methods

As detailed in [26], the primary search utilized ATSDR’s Toxicological Profiles (n=173 chemicals) and Addenda (n=41 chemicals). We read through the profiles and addenda in search of data pertaining to motor function development in association with chemical exposure. In order to find human studies corroborating or challenging the results of the toxicological profile and addenda animal studies as well as assess additional chemicals known to affect motor development, further searches were done on PubMed using common text words and MeSH terms related to motor function development: ((((((((motor[All Fields] AND ("physiology"[Subheading] OR "physiology"[All Fields] OR "function"[All Fields] OR "physiology"[MeSH Terms] OR "function"[All Fields]))) OR (sensorimotor[All Fields] AND ("physiology"[Subheading] OR "physiology"[All Fields] OR "function"[All Fields] OR "physiology"[MeSH Terms] OR "function"[All Fields]))) OR (visual[All Fields] AND motor[All Fields])) OR graphomotor) OR gross motor function) OR (fine AND motor AND function))) AND ("developmental disabilities"[MeSH Terms] OR ("developmental"[All Fields] AND "disabilities"[All Fields]) OR "developmental disabilities"[All Fields]) and different chemicals. Studies were not limited by date of publication, species, chemical, or study design; however, studies were limited to the English language. The following data from each study were extracted, when available: chemical name, exposure route, exposure duration and frequency, study design, cohort name and/or geographic location, sex of cohort subjects, NOAEL, and LOAEL.
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaEpidemiology, Toxicology, Environmental Health
Type of dataTable
How data was acquiredLiterature search
Data formatFiltered
Experimental factorsN/A (Literature review)
Experimental featuresN/A
Data source locationN/A
Data accessibilityData are with this article
  39 in total

1.  In utero exposure to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and neurodevelopment among young Mexican American children.

Authors:  Brenda Eskenazi; Amy R Marks; Asa Bradman; Laura Fenster; Caroline Johnson; Dana B Barr; Nicholas P Jewell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  PCBs, DDE, and child development at 18 and 24 months.

Authors:  W J Rogan; B C Gladen
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Intrauterine exposure to low levels of lead: the status of the neonate.

Authors:  C B Ernhart; A W Wolf; M J Kennard; P Erhard; H F Filipovich; R J Sokol
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct

4.  Correlates of low-level lead exposure in urban children at 2 years of age.

Authors:  D Bellinger; A Leviton; M Rabinowitz; H Needleman; C Waternaux
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effects of prenatal exposure to mercury on cognitive and psychomotor function in one-year-old infants: epidemiologic cohort study in Poland.

Authors:  Wieslaw Jedrychowski; Jeffery Jankowski; Elzbieta Flak; Anita Skarupa; Elzbieta Mroz; Elzbieta Sochacka-Tatara; Iwona Lisowska-Miszczyk; Agnieszka Szpanowska-Wohn; Virginia Rauh; Zbigniew Skolicki; Irena Kaim; Frederica Perera
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Neurodevelopmental performance among school age children in rural Guatemala is associated with prenatal and postnatal exposure to carbon monoxide, a marker for exposure to woodsmoke.

Authors:  Linda Dix-Cooper; Brenda Eskenazi; Carolina Romero; John Balmes; Kirk R Smith
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Dose-response analysis of infants prenatally exposed to methyl mercury: an application of a single compartment model to single-strand hair analysis.

Authors:  C Cox; T W Clarkson; D O Marsh; L Amin-Zaki; S Tikriti; G G Myers
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 8.  Windows of sensitivity to toxic chemicals in the motor effects development.

Authors:  Susan Z Ingber; Hana R Pohl
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Prenatal dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) exposure and neurodevelopment: a follow-up from 12 to 30 months of age.

Authors:  Luisa Torres-Sánchez; Lourdes Schnaas; Mariano E Cebrián; María del Carmen Hernández; Erika Osorio Valencia; Rosa María García Hernández; Lizbeth López-Carrillo
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Low-level lead exposure, social class, and infant development.

Authors:  D Bellinger; A Leviton; C Waternaux; H Needleman; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.